No. what I'm saying is that people seem to think that content alone makes good songs.
It doesn't.
It never has. Thats what frustrates backpackers and "purists"
If you want to have a message or send a point...make better music.
Even you talking about 'relating" to something, doesn't matter if the music itself isn't good.
And don't bring up Marvin Gaye or Lennon. AT THAT TIME, that was the extent of all everyone had. Yeah, in retrospect it sounds amazing, but everything you're comparing it to, didn't exist.
I don't even listen to "party" music all the time. I just know not to look down on those that create that sort of content. Thats my point here.
Personally, I'm more liable to listen to house, jazz, and R&B these days. But thats because the music is good, not because they're trying to be something they're not.
How can you say the "music isnt good", unless you get specific? You can say, perhaps, music of substance doesnt have mass appeal, and the reasons for that dont really reflect well on the hip hop fan collective. For every Joe underground head, who rejects mainstream rap --- there are about 10 groupie fans who wont accept any kind of hip hop that has substance in their music, so your argument goes both ways.