Thats the thing, the Rockets DON’T need that output from everyone to win, which is why that’s such an anomaly.
And how do you figure this, when the Rockets rely on 3-pt variance more than any other team, and had that in their favour last night, yet still lost?
Even with everything that went right for LA last night, they still damn near lost.
The Lakers were on the receiving end of one of the largest 3-pt swings in NBA Playoff history, and yet somehow you came to the conclusion that
everything went their way? I can't even possibly comprehend, nor do I want to, the shyt y'all Rockets fans are on to be this delusional after all these years.
It's like y'all overdosed on hope, and are now walking around like zombies.
Not seeing it just from the perspective on my team at all, I’m simply being logical and realistic, something you’ve never actually done in any discussion.
There's absolutely nothing "logical and realistic" about your stance. You're perceiving all this from the waters of bias that you're willingly drowning yourself in, and coming up for air acting like you ain't wet.
Westbrook had the most embarrassing performance you could have, and were still right there in it. THAT doesn’t bode well for the Lakers. To show how awful Westbrook was, it wouldn’t have even taken him an average game for them to win. He could’ve simply been subpar, and the Rockets win that far and away. Westbrook crippled them unbelievably, and being even subpar would’ve had a Rockets win.
For starters, this is who Russ is; he's an erratic, mutable, and incompatible factor, where these performances are the norm for him and not an outlier, especially given the fact that mitigation of his foibles aren't going to just magically happen given the circumstances of his health, form and seemingly decline. And again, you can't just automatically paint a picture of the differential being that if Russ played an average game, that, therefore, would mean the Rockets would win. The Rockets weren't
still right there in it, based upon them having a normal outing, again, it seems I have to reiterate, they were on the apogee of 3-pt shooting to get them to that point.
22 made three-point shots; 4th-highest amount in NBA Playoff history; their first loss in 17 games when shooting above 40% from behind the arc.
If there's a regression toward the mean with their shooting next game, then Westbrook will have to produce more than just a good performance. Do you think he can keep the regularity of that up for nearly every single game for the rest of the series, given that he's shown absolutely no ability to be that consistent? What do you think will happen if the Rockets end up having a 3-pt outing at the other end of the spectrum, as they did in the '18 postseason when they missed 27-straight threes?
Smarter decisions from MDA as well, who I think is the biggest wildcard out of anybody. Is he going to actually adjust heading into the next game, or be stubborn and do the same things and get the same results just to try to prove a point? We’ll know these next games.
Ask yourself, how many times in the past four postseasons, have you come away from a game and thought to yourself,
if only D'Antoni made smarter decisions?
It's like y'all Rockets fans have a sudden onset of amnesia every time the playoffs roll around every season.
