My issue is this shyt(X1X) being compared to HIGH END gaming PCs. Its just stupid.-Spliz-

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
51,662
Reputation
13,140
Daps
129,799
No. Only dumb nikkas will think he's right. Any respectable tech head would know for a fact that the XB1X isn't running at the highest quality settings at 4K.
why do you keep saying this?
No one is claiming that

Only sony stans :sas2:


All people are saying is that its comparable to higher end pc settings

And it is, that's what its compared to now because its jump pasted being compare to low end or medium end specs on pc. So for a console and console gaming it is comparable to higher game settings on PC.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
I knew this was coming.

As I said, no way to compare exactly. Quality settings on consoles are custom. In practice the quality settings are very similar to the eye. You take a pc game and compare "high" to "ultra" or whatever they chose to call it, the differences are hard to spot without zooming in and/or watching a digital foundry video.

And now we don't believe in benchmarks? :mjlol:
I didn't say the benchmarks aren't true. I said that the benchmark as is presented is misleading because no one just simply puts the game on high/medium and call it a day. A few settings that make a negligible visual difference and gets your framerate up to 60fps needs discussing.

Saying that "Oh the XB1X is on par because look at these benchmarks breh" and not telling the full story is silly because there's always settings that impact performance for low visual payoff.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,267
Reputation
4,325
Daps
117,784
Reppin
Tha Land
I didn't say the benchmarks aren't true. I said that the benchmark as is presented is misleading because no one just simply puts the game on high/medium and call it a day. A few settings that make a negligible visual difference and gets your framerate up to 60fps needs discussing.

Saying that "Oh the XB1X is on par because look at these benchmarks breh" and not telling the full story is silly because there's always settings that impact performance for low visual payoff.
Wait what?

PC gamers playing on console settings to get reasonable performance?

:wow:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
why do you keep saying this?
No one is claiming that

Only sony stans :sas2:


All people are saying is that its comparable to higher end pc settings

And it is, that's what its compared to now because its jump pasted being compare to low end or medium end specs on pc. So for a console and console gaming it is comparable to higher game settings on PC.
But it isn't :snoop:

You're literally only looking at the fact that it's 4K and 30fps and that's that.

It'd be like comparing two people doing pushups who both do 100 pushups in a minute and then go "Damn this lil guy is on par with dude over there" meanwhile you're leaving out the fact that dude over there is literally doing pushups with weights on his back.

You don't know what settings it's running at and yet you're comparing it to a PC benchmark on the highest settings. If that doesn't make sense to you then I got a bridge to sell you.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
Wait what?

PC gamers playing on console settings to get reasonable performance?

:wow:
What are the "console settings" in this case? :jbhmm:



and your second line is dumb. If the game had to be put to console settings to reach THIRTY FPS you'd have a point but it isn't.


Console game at console settings hitting 4K/30fps isn't comparable to the same game running at higher settings on a PC. It's misleading and only makes sense when you don't know what you're talking about.

You're being purposefully stupid right now:mjlol:
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
51,662
Reputation
13,140
Daps
129,799
But it isn't :snoop:

You're literally only looking at the fact that it's 4K and 30fps and that's that.

You don't know what settings it's running at and yet you're comparing it to a PC benchmark on the highest settings. If that doesn't make sense to you then I got a bridge to sell you.

For higher end gaming, the "understood" baseline is 4k 30fps. With 4k 60fps being optimal and anything more than achieving those things being bragging rights

I'm not talking about the very top of higher pc gaming, that's always going to be miles ahead of consoles. But as far as stepping into the ring the xb1x is pretty much in there. The ps4 pro too, but it dips in and out.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
74,267
Reputation
4,325
Daps
117,784
Reppin
Tha Land
What are the "console settings" in this case? :jbhmm:



and your second line is dumb. If the game had to be put to console settings to reach THIRTY FPS you'd have a point but it isn't.

You're being purposefully stupid right now:mjlol:
You went and found a guy that took the beta, made a bunch of tweeks and posted some benchmarks of the game not even at 4K. With drops all the way to the 40s

And you wanna say those are/should be the benchmarks we go by.

You the one in here being purposely stupid.

Damn dummy:smh:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
For higher end gaming, the "understood" baseline is 4k 30fps. With 4k 60fps being optimal and anything more than achieving those things being bragging rights

I'm not talking about the very top of higher pc gaming, that's always going to be miles ahead of consoles. But as far as stepping into the ring the xb1x is pretty much in there. The ps4 pro too, but it dips in and out.
No there isn't no "understood" baseline. You just made that up to justify your stannery. There is no baseline for PC. Some PC brehs opt for higher framerates, some resolution, some graphical settings etc.
 
Last edited:

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
You went and found a guy that took the beta, made a bunch of tweeks and posted some benchmarks of the game not even at 4K. With drops all the way to the 40s

And you wanna say those are/should be the benchmarks we go by.

You the one in here being purposely stupid.

Damn dummy:smh:

I have the damn game on PC your moron lol.

The shyt can play at 4K/ high settings and at 60fps and let's entertain your argument.

The game at high settings can still drop to 40s you say? Does the XB1X even reach 40fps? What settings are the Xb1X running at?

But you just said these settings are "negligible":jbhmm:
I said certain settings at a specific level are negligible.

These are from NVIDIA themselves:

Settings Wrap-Up

If you read our Destiny 2 GPU recommendations at the start of this guide, you'll know that Bungie's shooter runs extremely well on the complete range of GeForce GTX 10-Series GPUs, and previous-generation GPUs of equivalent speed.

If, however, you wish to improve performance, our interactive comparisons and benchmarks reveal that you can dial down several settings without affecting image quality too significantly:


  • Depth of Field: A few scenes and cinematics will look less stylish with High DoF, but during gameplay you'll save nearly 4 FPS
  • Field of View: Using a FoV of 95 degrees, instead of 105 degrees, will save you 2.4 FPS
  • Foliage Detail Distance: Dropping to Medium from High recoups 4.1 frames per second
  • Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: Using the less-impressive HDAO improves performance by a sizeable 5.4 FPS
  • Shadow Quality: High shadows still look pretty good, and save you 4.1 FPS
Making those five changes will improve your performance by 20 FPS, and in the heat of battle you're unlikely to notice the difference. Alternatively, try our one-click GeForce Experience Optimal Playable Settings to immediately discover optimum settings for your system.

Even if you put those settings pound for pound with a Xbox, the shytty CPU in it will hold it back so it's still not on par with a high end gaming PC because no one would be playing on a GTX 1070 or 80 with a fukking Jaguar equivalent.

You console dudes say the dumbest shyt :mindblown:.

A XB1X and a PS4 Pro is good but they're "on par" with a high end gaming PC. That's just bullshyt exaggeration on you guys part.
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
51,662
Reputation
13,140
Daps
129,799
No there isn't no "understood" baseline. You just made that up to justify your stannery.
:picard:


No there is a baseline.

just like before people were building 4k machines they wanted 1080p 30fps

There is always a baseline.

Right now entry into "high end gaming" is 4k 30frames
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,737
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,883
:picard:


No there is a baseline.

just like before people were building 4k machines they wanted 1080p 30fps

There is always a baseline.

Right now entry into "high end gaming" is 4k 30frames
zJN4e_s-200x150.gif


This is officially the dumbest shyt I've seen in months on here. No one ever said 1080P/30fps. This is absolutely stannery to the nth degree to make Xbox look good.

I'm done with you dudes Jesus christ :laff:

This nikka said 1080P/30fps was the baseline. Not even your boy Meach could spin that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top