prophecypro
Hollywood North
Healtes and Shaq/Kobe running mainstream attention
You dont say....
You dont say....
You dont say....More like Miami's dumb for letting him leave. They've been there 4 times in a row? LeBron's about to go to his 6thLebrons retarded for leaving Heat...they went to finals 4 years in a row![]()



And he went to the Finals with his new(old) team the year after he left, so what's retarded about it?Lebrons retarded for leaving Heat...they went to finals 4 years in a row![]()
LeBron went to the Finals the next season, and the Heat didn't even make the playoffs. 
Surprised you're not the WOAT poster.Lebrons retarded for leaving Heat...they went to finals 4 years in a row![]()

If kings did not get robbed in 2002 they would have produced the all time low ratings, that 02 season was garbage, especially the eastern conference.
.
SO basically you are telling me that david stern fixed the 02 conference finals by letting kings shoot more free throws to keep a competitive series but got so much into it that he gave away 3 wins to the kings in 5 games already and he had to save the lakers with that game 6. Holly shyt now it makes perfect sense!The Kings shot 20 more free throws than the league leading Lakers when the series was over. The Kings committed 5 intentional fouls which lead to 10 extra free throws in Game 6. Game 6, 5 and 2 were horribly officiated.
Stern probably didn't want another 15-1 run by Lakers. He wanted to make it seem competitive. After Game 1, the Lakers were on their way to another 15-1 run. The refs stretched the series and Kings choked on their home floor in Game 7. In actuality, the Lakers were almost robbed.
this could be like a huge conspiracy theory, and that cp3 trade veto has something to do with this, nba wanted to destroy the los angeles lakers 
Lakers stay giving networks that stimulus package.....now Silver, give us the first pick![]()

Well it's just my theory. Game 2 gave the Kings confidence and momentum while robbing the Lakers of theirs. Game 3 and 4 were fair to both sides then the fukkery of Games 5 and 6 and then what Stern and the NBA wanted, Game 7. The owners were the reason why the Lakers didn't get CP3. Stern bowed down to whining owners like Dan Gilbert and Mark Cuban.SO basically you are telling me that david stern fixed the 02 conference finals by letting kings shoot more free throws to keep a competitive series but got so much into it that he gave away 3 wins to the kings in 5 games already and he had to save the lakers with that game 6. Holly shyt now it makes perfect sense!
And if kings were really good they should have won that game 7 I agree, I think every series should have this rule. If your team is leading 3-2 in the series you basically have to give away game 6 and then you have to play game 7. Basically you are not allowed to win game 6 if you have 3 wins already in the series. Now that would be awesome. And they could edit this rule later like not allowing teams to win 4 playoff games in a row, if you do this you have to play 4 more games. That way no team would be able to see the 16-0 playoffs record and it would keep the series competitive.
The greatest story never told, david stern robbed the lakers in 2002this could be like a huge conspiracy theory, and that cp3 trade veto has something to do with this, nba wanted to destroy the los angeles lakers
![]()

GOAT organization don't give nan shyt who watches them push wigs back in the finals:blessedspur:
Refs and the NBA stay trying to screw Swag Antonio because of low ratings and they got 5 chips anyway:blessedspur:

how'd they do in the playoffs last year again???Lebrons retarded for leaving Heat...they went to finals 4 years in a row![]()