Everyone who has watched the nba for the last 40+ yearsWho wants to watch and play in 82 regular season games?
Everyone who has watched the nba for the last 40+ yearsWho wants to watch and play in 82 regular season games?
You probably won’t, but ya’ll didn’t only draft your core guys you got KD that turned into Russel/Wiggins on your cap book. The warriors didn’t just over the cap they stayed there.But we drafted Poole we shouldn’t be penalized for paying him
$500k is going to change that?Ngl I welcome mid season tournament, nba season be lame af until like March. Players and teams don't he be giving a fukk on defense 80% of the season
Everyone who has watched the nba for the last 40+ years
We only got KD just off the strength Steph had one of the most player friendly contracts in the league due to his previous ankle issues.. otherwise if that wasn’t the case we wouldn’t have been able to attain KD..You probably won’t, but ya’ll didn’t only draft your core guys you got KD that turned into Russel/Wiggins on your cap book. The warriors didn’t just over the cap they stayed there.
Anyhow it all depends on the timing of when this goes into affect but it may not affect ya’ll drastically. It may make keeping Draymond harder, but the warriors chose Poole over him already.
They negotiated like they had no leverage, I don’t get it unless they also wanted to stop super teamsPlayers got Bent over backwards reading this cba smh
In an attempt to curb load management and lost games among star players, the NBA is tying eligibility for postseason awards -- such as All-NBA teams and MVP -- to a mandatory 65 games played. The 65-game minimum does come with some conditions.
The league was threatening to opt out last night, so I'm guessing that was enough to get the players to give up some concession or not fight as hard.They negotiated like they had no leverage, I don’t get it unless they also wanted to stop super teams
The loopholes probably deal with legit injuries involving surgeriesfeels like this is kind of going under the radar. even though the whole "with some conditions" means there will loopholes.
It'd actually create less roster turnover in most cases as it'd put more emphasis on teams signing current players to contract extensions early rather than waiting until FA and that's before you factor in how hard it would be to replace players via FA as it is with a lot of teams already at or over the cap.Kind of a "boring" CBA because they didn't touch the one and done.
Contract extensions being incentivized over free agency signings means we'll be seeing a lot more roster turnover due to teams playing hardball in contract negotiations.
Depends on the player. I think top, all-star level players will stay more but players who are a little more questionable may have a hard time getting every penny. Like a FVV who is a fringe all-star, really good player, but if he's demanding a max you'll let him test the waters.It'd actually create less roster turnover in most cases as it'd put more emphasis on teams signing current players to contract extensions early rather than waiting until FA and that's before you factor in how hard it would be to replace players via FA as it is with a lot of teams already at or over the cap.
Penalizing teams for re-signing players they drafted that never played for another franchise is stupid/asinine...A team like GS who drafted Curry/Klay/Green should not get hit with a tax for re-singing them.