You cannot call what Chandler does as being a "controlled backtap". The only "control" in it (most of the time), is in the fact that he's making sure the players around him don't get the ball. He's not "controlling" it so that it goes directly to one of his teammates. All he's doing is hitting it away from the other player(s) near him trying to get it, and hoping it lands close to one or more of his teammates.
Him (or anyone for that matter) getting credit for a rebound in that situation is ridiculous. The whole "it's only a rebound if his team gets it" is a horseshyt reason also. It makes no sense that Player A (tipper) can knock the ball backwards, Player B (teammate) and Player C (opposing team) are near the ball. Player B gets the ball, and player A gets credit for the rebound, yet Player C gets the ball, and HE gets credit for the rebound. Since it was a "rebound", Player A should get a turnover, and Player C should get a steal.
I know there's some folks on here that don't really like to use their brain, but in what world does that scenario make sense? The person that gains possession of the ball should get the rebound. Tapping =/= possession.
Going a step further...since those count as rebounds, how bout if he backtaps with the clock winding down, his teammate get the ball, and chucks up a 3 and it goes in...does he get an assist for that? No? But why not? He "grabbed the rebound" and "passed it to his teammate" for an "open" shot.
lol, the whole thing is ridiculous.