Well his main position should be the 2..he shouldnt gain more than 10/15 lean Lbs in the next few years tops. In reality, the positional designation is becoming outdated. A wing is a wing then you have point guards and bigs. Everything else is rotational and can be worked around with a good roster and game planning. I actually really liked the Spreewell comparison by Webber the other night...Wiggins has more upside but the frame is somewhat similar from what I remember and Spree did fine at both positions without much weight gain. Spree was more tough than Wiggins is now but the league is softer as well.
The problem with OKC is what assets they have to work with. Theyre not going to give up Adams..and they shouldnt. I dont think any team is really valuing Jackson or Lamb. The best thing they have is Perk's expiring. If the Thunder want Gerald Wallace's corpse for him the Celts would take it very gladly.
Nah, their frames aren't all that similar, Spree was listed at 6'5" but he was shorter than Allan Houston who was also listed at 6'5" -
Meanwhile Zach LaVine was 6'6" in shoes and looks like this next to Wiggins -
I agree with you that Andrew shouldn't gain anything more than 10-15lbs as he gets older, he doesn't look like he has the frame to pack on a lot of mass either which is why being at the 2 should be priority. If I had to say who he plays like, it's kind of hard cause he can score from the post which is an odd thing for a 19 year old wing to do. His game seems like a mashup really, like he took pieces of Kobe's game (turn around) & Tmacs, his handle isn't nearly as strong as theirs, but how he scores is more like them.
Playing him at the 2 would be a matchup problem if they can get a legitimate 3 to play next to him, someone that has 3 size so that putting a 2 guard on them would be a bad move. I know
@tremonthustler1 doesn't like him, but someone like Stanley Johnson next to Wiggins would be a good look if they fall out of the Hezonja / Towns range in the draft since he's so physical.
