Dog....you lived under it. You lived below it.
Whose fault is that? The person who uses it wrongly in saying you had a lot of it rather than none?
I'm going to check the film on themBears 2 rookie olineman jus maulin nikkas. Look at that hole on Forte's 55yard run
No...your point is dumb because you living under is YOUR fault not the person saying you had it.
Yes you are. You're clearly finding a flaw in anyone using the word. That is outright DUMB.
theres a flaw in saying they had any?im giving u my personal opinion breh. im not trying to pass off my opinion as fact or law. u dont have to agree with me. just peep the history of sports. there are more nobodies with unrealized potential than dudes that realized their potential or exceeded it. give me a wayne chrebet or laveranues coles(intelligent hard workers) over a Peter Warrick (monstrous potential) or Charles Rogers (also monstrous potential) any day
theres a flaw in saying they had any?
Potential is a "suspected end result." Being captain obvious speaking on "the "end result doesn't make the use of the word overrated.
like i said, lets wait a few more years before jumping on the geno bandwagon. potential means exactly shyt til he proves it. u can get hyped off 4 TDs and 6 INTs if u want to, but we 1 dumb penalty away from being 1-2. so lets not declare geno the gawd just yet.
Wait for what?
Wait for what?
One can say a player has BAD potential.
Players are drafted on potential. People are hired on potential. Relationships are made on potential. Who "waits" on shyt being realized when potential is tied to "chance?"
What the hell? Chance is a crime now? Good lord, this may be the dumbest back and forth I've had in the coli. "Don't speak on chance until it happens."
Potential can be good or bad
And where did I say Geno was a gawd? What did I declare Geno as? Who are you responding too??
so far i like geno but im not sold yet. i hope he becomes a great qb and the franchise guy we been waiting for but i been a jet fan too long to jump on the hype wagon just yet.
Sucking him off as "what"?
as i recall, this whole back and forth started cause u wasnt feeling my opinion.
potential isnt wrong and potential shouldnt be stricken from the english language. but PERSONALLY, i dont put much stock into potential as a rating for a football player. thats all i said and u butthurt cause u obviously in love with geno or something. 53% completion, 800 yards, 3 pass TDs(1 rush) 6 interceptions (including 3 in the 4th quarter of a winnable game) and 65 qb rating. so i refuse to get on the bandwagon based on "potential". so if u wanna go out of ur way and make gifs and game pictures based on geno's greatness 3 games into his career, by all means, its ur right to do so. but im not sold yet which is all i said playa. people trying to hype up geno using "potential" as a talking point instead of football iq and protecting the football(which he hasnt proven he can do yet) are on the bandwagon too early.
that is all, continue sucking him off.
Sucking him off as "what"?
Tell me where? Where did I say he was proven for you to "imagine" e the counter argument you're making.
the thread title and OP nikka. as far as the coli u seem to be the biggest geno fan i see here. u havent outright said u think he's the next great thing but ur posts point to that. "geno aint scared to make dem throws" as if thats proof of something. its a marty morninwheg offense. you dont know football if u werent expecting some deep passing
I don't know football now?
