The rules still apply b. Lets say he records a song with a sample. What he gon do when them old cacs hit him with a law suit?
Unless you think you jus gon be a megastar by cranking out bangas messin with Fruity Loops from ya mommas basement, you gotta think about the liablities of having a music career. Jus even getting a proper radio mix and master cost like 2gs b. Where is all this money gonna come from?
Wrong. Everybody can't own the masters. If he creates the beat and owns the masters where does that leave the artist? The artist is usually the one who owns the masters to a song if the artists label doesn't own it. Besides that everyone who know's anything about industry politics knows it is the artists responsibility to clear the sample if he uses it on his project. The producer is just a work-for-hire, so the producer gets paid upfront and on the back-end via publishing since the composition of a beat is technically composition of the overall track, so essentially the producer is credited as one of the songwriters and compensated with Royalties.




It is absolutely ridiculous to assume that.
mac miller must be making some serious money mountain dew deals and gold singles
You should have the visibility and some money at that point. If you can't scrape up $50,000 to record an album at that point, you've been mismanaging your funds somewhere along the line 
