Full Measures
All Star
Mosgov gonna go back to mother Russia
![]()
breh where is this from?Mosgov gonna go back to mother Russia
![]()
breh where is this from?Well, to be clear, the leadership for the players agreed to this. The players haven't voted yet. It wouldn't be the first time a body rejects a deal its union leadership agreed to.They are not. Players are agreeing to it (which is stupid)
No, no, yes. The current discussion is relevant to why. Getting shot and shot at are good examples of failure, unless you think you deflected the bullets with your little security blanket.
Well, to be clear, the leadership for the players agreed to this. The players haven't voted yet. It wouldn't be the first time a body rejects a deal its union leadership agreed to.
Is this a joke?Hell naw man. You're trippin. Please tell me a team sports rule that overruled a constitutional right?
Is this a joke?
You realize that professional contracts itself are not constitutional?
Remember the Dress Code? Thats basically a violation of the first amendment.
Donald Sterling lost his team down to his speech.
Americans really need a lesson in civics.
Can you bring a gun to your job even though most state laws don't bar you from carrying a firearm?

The NBA could never supersede the 2nd amendment
That CBA measure/rule will never pass
I'm not being stubborn breh. My point stands. The NBA WIL never outlaw players from legally owning guns
Mostly, Stern did not view Kaepernick’s protest to be a constitutional right, but one granted by the contract between the NFLPA and the league.
Stern suspended NBA player Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf for a similar protest in 1996, but said Kaepernick’s case was different because he had the permission of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, and because president Obama said he had a constitutional right to speak out.
“Wrong!” Stern exclaimed. “He has the rights his union collectively bargained for him, but I guess Obama didn’t take a class in labor law.”
Dude, read your own words. You're talking about "superseding the Second Amendment." Or "team sports rules overruling the Second Amendment." Clearly you're saying that the league cannot implement a rule that takes away a right protected by the Second Amendment. However that is patently false because we've tried to tell your ass that a private party is not a state actor (the government), thus they can do so if they want. Are you trolling or something?



Wake me up when the league says that players aren't allowed to legally own firearms
You couldn't even imagine this being proposed or passed to the NHL or MLB
Y'all don't see the racial undertones to this shyt![]()

You're all over the place in this thread.
First, they couldn't do this because of the constitution, then it's was they wouldn't do this cuz the players wouldn't agree, now you're talking about racial undertones?![]()

Please quote me where I supposedly said this?
And me saying that this rule has racial undertones is a fact 
Damn these goalpost moves are very bad. Just take the L and keep it moving.Wake me up when the league says that players aren't allowed to legally own firearms
You couldn't even imagine this being proposed or passed to the NHL or MLB
Y'all don't see the racial undertones to this shyt![]()
Damn these goalpost moves are very bad. Just take the L and keep it moving.

