BasicallyGreed not guns was the driving force behind the slave trade.
Like what?Afghan militants had US made weaponry that was superior to Soviet junk![]()
Stinger missiles vs soviet helicopters that didn’t have any counter flare systems until later in the conflictLike what?
people don't want to see the motherland & it's people in it's true lightThey are giving Europeans WAY too much credit
Yeah Europeans are so gully they just ran up in Africa bussin and making people lay down
No
They had to manipulate and finesse as well as use the disunity among seperate tribes against them
If it wasnt for that they wouldnt have done shyt but catch malaria and get their asses beat in a 1 v 1
OhStinger missiles vs soviet helicopters that didn’t have any counter flare systems until later in the conflict
Notice who dapped it and notice how many daps that post got. Then you will see how many fake black accounts are really on the coli.Cac despise this book lol
No shyt. But at the end of the day, the raped, pillaged, killed, and stole everything from Africa. Trying to blame a few Africans for selling their own is cac racist talking points and Kanye would happily approve you type of nikkas.
OK. Sadly, yes. But, some of that happened due to getting cozy with Whites. Many Africans were trusting and wanted to establish business/tradingrelationships -- -- and it backfired.
And Again. It wasn't a "few." I guess the better question is -- what's your definition of a "few?"
And the other portion of your comment is a joke.
The Transatlantic Slave Trade and Africa's involvement was a well-oiled system. Over 13 Million Africans were taken from West and Central Africa from the 1400's to the mid 1800's.
It was slave ports, slave castles, slave caves, African slave traders, barrac00ns, African interpreters for slave buying/trading, they had som tribes intermarrying relationships with Europeans -- again it wasn't a few. Slavery, like we know
![]()