Nigerian scientist proves gay marriage is wrong

[Mountain]

That's a dumb argument because it implies that either all of that stuff is okay or none of it is. So it can't be OK to kill animals unless it's ok to fukk them also?

The fck kind of stupid question is that? Its deemed ok in todays society but the point is it shouldn't be. How can society not find it acceptable for some weirdo to fck an animal without its consent, but find it acceptable for him to kill/enslave that animal for luxury purposes without its consent? If you cant see the blatant flaw in that double standard then youre a fukkin idiot.

And you got shut down with the quickness when you posted that dumb shyt originally, so why repost it here?

This was his rebuttal to that post and the following arguments related to it:

Spoiler

Guess what?

We make the rules nikka.

No deity is going to answer the tough questions for you. You're more than welcome to be come a member of PETA if you want to as well.

Society also 'made the rules' during slavery, so I guess slavery was justified for that period, correct?

It's funny how he's sounding more like the bigots he's accused others of being.

"We make the rules, ******, fukk your freedoms!"

Its hilarious breh, I honestly cant believe he had the nerve to type that bullshyt lol.

Slavery cant be argued for. I won't lie. (as a black man even)

Now, whats your point?

You can't fukk a goat cause sex implies consent in the USA.

Thats how the country has come to define its legal system.

...theres nothing "objective" about it though, so if thats what you're asking then you're out of luck.

Thats what you call getting shut down? Napoleon got humbled for supporting the exact same slave master mentality used against my people and recanted part of his rebuttal to the post, then went back to the same stupid consent argument, but I got shut down right? Foh.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

The fck kind of stupid question is that? Its deemed ok in todays society but the point is it shouldn't be. How can society not find it acceptable for some weirdo to fck an animal without its consent, but find it acceptable for him to kill/enslave that animal for luxury purposes without its consent? If you cant see the blatant flaw in that double standard then youre a fukkin idiot.

How is that a stupid question when the rest of your post confirms my whole point? You want it be all or nothing, either it's all ok or none of it is, and it doesn't work like that. That's not a double standard; that's just your ridiculous strawman argument.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The fck kind of stupid question is that? Its deemed ok in todays society but the point is it shouldn't be. How can society not find it acceptable for some weirdo to fck an animal without its consent, but find it acceptable for him to kill/enslave that animal for luxury purposes without its consent? If you cant see the blatant flaw in that double standard then youre a fukkin idiot.



This was his rebuttal to that post and the following arguments related to it:


Thats what you call getting shut down? Napoleon got humbled for supporting the exact same slave master mentality used against my people and recanted part of his rebuttal to the post, then went back to the same stupid consent argument, but I got shut down right? Foh.

Humbled?

What the fukk are you talking about?

I always stand by my argument.

Slaves were economically viable, moral absolutism be damned.

That was the point of my argument, not that slavery was something I supported.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Good post

Should be its own thread tbh

Is that her hair?

 

[Mountain]

How is that a stupid question when the rest of your post confirms my whole point? You want it be all or nothing, either it's all ok or none of it is, and it doesn't work like that. That's not a double standard; that's just your ridiculous strawman argument.

I dont want it to be anything, I honestly dont care about how society it treats animals or beastisality, im just illustrating how ridiculouse societys general sentiment towards the issue is. Truth is you cant justify societies general sentiment towards the issue, hence why you havent tried to. Edit: my argument wasnt a straw man either because i wasnt trying to refute your point.

Humbled?

What the fukk are you talking about?

I always stand by my argument.

Slaves were economically viable, moral absolutism be damned.

That was the point of my argument, not that slavery was something I supported.

Stop lying, you aint say sht about the economic viability, you simply replied with "we made the rulez nikka" then ranted about peta and a bunch of bullsht. You responded as if society making the rules is some sort of justification, then later on admitted that you cant justify society's past commitment to slavery after I checked you

 

[Thighmaster B]

Just to make sure people don't confuse the issues, animals are treated like property (with some rights under some specific circumstances). Consent for fukking an animal is irrelevant and is purely dependent on a country's sexual taboos (some countries outlaw bestiality, others don't care).

But the issue of marriage is different. It's a legal arrangement between two individuals. Obviously, an animal is not recognized as a human being, of legal age and citizen of a particular country/territory. But even if that were out of the way, no animal understands what's going on, can sign documents or actually perform the ceremony.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

I dont want it to be anything, I honestly dont care about how society it treats animals or beastisality, im just illustrating how ridiculouse societys general sentiment towards the issue is. Truth is you cant justify societies general sentiment towards the issue, hence why you havent tried to. My argument wasnt a straw man either, you were talking about animals/consent and thats exactly what I addressed.

No. My point was that homosexuality and bestiality can't be compared because animals can't give consent. You came in like, "B-b-but animals can't give consent to a lot of stuff!" none of which had anything to with my point. You want to argue about ethical treatment of animals, that's fine, but none of that changes the fact that that consent is not in question in a typical homosexual relationship, but it is in bestiality, so they're not comparable.

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

Obviously Homosexuality does cause harm to society. It harms the institution of marriage, Lowers Birth rate, STDs prevalence increases significantly

gay marriage leads to More children will grow up Fatherless/Motherless etc etc.

Okay now that we legalized gay marriage can we legalize pologamy ? how about incest?

"If a person's choice of spouse cannot be limited based on the sex of one's partner, it is hard to see how it could be limited based on the number of spouses either. "

Can you explain how gay marriage leads to more children growing up Fatherless and motherless please?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Stop lying, you aint say sht about the economic viability, you simply replied with "we made the rulez nikka" then ranted about peta and a bunch of bullsht. You responded as if society making the rules is some sort of justification, then later on admitted that you cant justify society's past commitment to slavery after I checked you

You don't have an argument.

People make the rules they want to be governed by.

 

[observe]

#ThingsDumbPeopleSay

Science isn't stupid. His methods are stupid.

I was trolling fool

 

[MAKAVELI25]

I was trolling fool

I thought trolling was supposed to be funny

 

[observe]

I thought trolling was supposed to be funny

I was trying to get a reaction...

 

[Mountain]

No. My point was that homosexuality and bestiality can't be compared because animals can't give consent. You came in like, "B-b-but animals can't give consent to a lot of stuff!" none of which had anything to with my point. You want to argue about ethical treatment of animals, that's fine, but none of that changes the fact that that consent is not in question in a typical homosexual relationship, but it is in bestiality, so they're not comparable.

Thats because I wasn't trying to refute your point, I re posted my old post because it relates to the topic of animal consent and I wanted to discuss the stupidity of societies sentiment towards the issue. Whats typical in terms of consent really doesn't matter to me, the fact is beastiality can be consensual under the right conditions, so they are comparable. It is what it is though, Im not trying to spend all day on here so lets leave it alone.

You don't have an argument.

People make the rules they want to be governed by.

Ok breh

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I was trying to get a reaction...

you've said "anti-science" comments before.

 

[Thighmaster B]

you've said "anti-science" comments before.

Lack of troll imagination?