nikkas always talk about how they want polygamy to be legal but...

[Turbulent]

I think the main reason it's illegal is that the division of wealth for children as well as spouses in case of death or seperation would be a giant mess. It's already complicated as it is.

 

[Starman]

And you think that and that alone would entice rich men en masse (including those that aren't married now) to marry up all of the most attractive women?

Its about what is socially acceptable by and large. By and large, most women want to be the only one. Its much more of a cultural issue than a legal one.

 

[FTBS]

Yeah I did.

You keep trying to say, "well every rich guy isn't doing it"

It doesn't matter. People are lazy and won't jump through hoops.

I already said there are "kept men/women" I get that.

But they're not automatically legally entitled to certain benefits and representation in the eyes of the law.

Just cause the star athlete might have a harem doesn't mean he's legally bound to them or that he CAN be...

No you didn't. This is the question I asked in reference to the bolded:

And you think that and that alone would entice rich men en masse (including those that aren't married now) to marry up all of the most attractive women?

 

[Ghpstface]

I'm positive I would get chosen lol

I would choose you gurl

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I think the main reason it's illegal is that the division of wealth for children as well as spouses in case of death or seperation would be a giant mess. It's already complicated as it is.

This is just another reason on top of many others.

Lets be honest...laws are meant to keep society stable.

I'm as much of a nihilist as I can be, but I realize that things are stable for a reason cause you have to account for what the most extreme circumstance is, and work to contain it.

If you got an increase in dudes committing rapes, violent crimes, or just being shiftless and lazy because they can't find spouses, that resonates into other areas of the society including the economy.

Social stability becomes an existential threat when you introduce polygamy on a legal issue.

And i'm OK with people having multiple partners etc...but NOT LEGALLY.

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

y'all ain't built for polygamy; you just want it to be legal to fukk multiple women. i don't need a law to do that

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

No you didn't. This is the question I asked in reference to the bolded:

Yes. Because people do what the law allows them to do if theres enough incentive.

You telling me dudes like Richard Branson or Mark Cuban wouldn't marry more than one broad? How about 4? or 6?

Between the two of them, I just named an additional 10 WOMEN (12-2) that are out of the dating pool for other viable and qualified bachelors.

You don't want to live in that society bro...cause YOU will lose.

 

[FTBS]

Its about what is socially acceptable by and large. By and large, most women want to be the only one. Its much more of a cultural issue than a legal one.

Most women in most cultures want to be married to (or at least in a committed relationship with) their children's father and have all their children by that one guy. How's that working out? Rich, powerful men can do what they want and would have no shortage of women wiling to go along with it.

 

[wickedsm]

Yall should read up on the Mormon Lost Boys. That's exactly where some of yall would be headed

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Most women in most cultures want to be married to (or at least in a committed relationship with) their children's father and have all their children by that one guy. How's that working out? Rich, powerful men can do what they want and would have no shortage of women wiling to go along with it.

Once theres kids, thats a different story. You have that obligation to take care of them, but you're not married to the wife so she doesn't have complete control over your estate, liabilities, finances, assets, etc.

Stop equating polyAMORY with polyGAMY.

Two different things.

 

[FTBS]

Yes. Because people do what the law allows them to do if theres enough incentive.

You telling me dudes like Richard Branson or Mark Cuban wouldn't marry more than one broad? How about 4? or 6?

Between the two of them, I just named an additional 10 WOMEN (12-2) that are out of the dating pool for other viable and qualified bachelors.

You don't want to live in that society bro...cause YOU will lose.

People, especially rich people, break the law all the time. All the benefits of legal marriage go to the woman. The man's benefit is having a variety of pieces of ass at their disposal and once again nothing is stopping Branson or Cuban or any other rich dudes from having that now if they wanted it.

 

[FTBS]

Once theres kids, thats a different story. You have that obligation to take care of them, but you're not married to the wife so she doesn't have complete control over your estate, liabilities, finances, assets, etc.

Stop equating polyAMORY with polyGAMY.

Two different things.

Which is more beneficial to the man?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

People, especially rich people, break the law all the time. All the benefits of legal marriage go to the woman. The man's benefit is having a variety of pieces of ass at their disposal and once again nothing is stopping Branson or Cuban or any other rich dudes from having that now if they wanted it.

Rich people aren't breaking laws to marry more than one person. You literally can't do it right now. What are you talking about?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Which is more beneficial to the man?

Thats not for me to decide.

Look. Lets leave rich men out of this.

The dude who works at your job, with WAY more swagger than you, and may even make less money than you, can EASILY pull your chick. and wife her.

And you'd still be assed out

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Seems smarter to get with a woman who also enjoys women and switch out girlfriends. Splitting your resources too much is silly.