nikkas always talk about how they want polygamy to be legal but...

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,814
Reputation
-2,828
Daps
37,316
It's still the same concept. The most salient things for rich people in regards to marriage are divorce and death. You can bequeath stuff to whoever you want. Plenty of chicks in our current society are willing to live with a guy and even start a family with him without being married. You aren't obligated to get or stay married anymore in our culture and you wouldn't be if polygamy was legal either. It's all about choice, whether it's legally recognized or not. And that's what this all comes down too...choice. If people wanted to live the polygamous lifestyle with the current law they could for the most part.

True, but it's culturally unacceptable because of societal pressures and expectations and it should remain unacceptable.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,407
Reputation
3,939
Daps
59,242
Reppin
NULL
True, but it's culturally unacceptable because of societal pressures and expectations and it should remain unacceptable.

These things don't exist in 2016, especially when it comes to rich folks. Charlie Sheen was basically living that lifestyle a few years ago and the culture paid millions to see him ramble on stage about it. If some rich CEO decided to have 10 hot girlfriends no one would bat an eye. And even if they did, he probably wouldn't care and would continue on about his business.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,889
Reputation
-34,904
Daps
641,255
Reppin
The Deep State
It's still the same concept. The most salient things for rich people in regards to marriage are divorce and death. You can bequeath stuff to whoever you want. Plenty of chicks in our current society are willing to live with a guy and even start a family with him without being married. You aren't obligated to get or stay married anymore in our culture and you wouldn't be if polygamy was legal either. It's all about choice, whether it's legally recognized or not. And that's what this all comes down too...choice. If people wanted to live the polygamous lifestyle with the current law they could for the most part.
Doesn't matter. Legal marriages automatically resolves those things. Informal unions are dependent on whether or not said couples/arrangements create their own circumstances.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,407
Reputation
3,939
Daps
59,242
Reppin
NULL
Doesn't matter. Legal marriages automatically resolves those things. Informal unions are dependent on whether or not said couples/arrangements create their own circumstances.

And that is exactly what I am talking about. Laws aren't gonna stop any man that wants (and can support) multiple women from doing so and they aren't gonna make a man that doesn't want to live such a lifestyle live that lifestyle. The OG point of contention was your suggestion that all the bad women would be scooped up by all the rich men. My point is that nothing is really stopping them from doing that now if they wanted to.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,889
Reputation
-34,904
Daps
641,255
Reppin
The Deep State
And that is exactly what I am talking about. Laws aren't gonna stop any man that wants (and can support) multiple women from doing so and they aren't gonna make a man that doesn't want to live such a lifestyle live that lifestyle. The OG point of contention was your suggestion that all the bad women would be scooped up by all the rich men. My point is that nothing is really stopping them from doing that now if they wanted to.
Except they are.

The point is that MOST PEOPLE aren't making those informal arrangements. Thats the difference.

You're using a small number of anecdotes to represent the opposite of a macro-change to what would happen if everyone had this option.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,407
Reputation
3,939
Daps
59,242
Reppin
NULL
Except they are.

The point is that MOST PEOPLE aren't making those informal arrangements. Thats the difference.

You're using a small number of anecdotes to represent the opposite of a macro-change to what would happen if everyone had this option.

Right. So why would they make them formally if allowed to? Just because it's legal?
 

mcdivit85

Superstar
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
4,529
Reputation
3,660
Daps
18,339
Reppin
Sound Reasoning
Floyd the GOAT Mayweather said it best if I can buy multiple cars so I can afford to have multiple women. Floyd has the money to support multiple women. :ehh: If you a broke dusty you shouldn't be able to take care of 3-5 or more wives. Cuz how you gonna support 4-5 women you gonna have at least 10-14 kids running around. However if you have lots of dough you should. nikkas who want to legal polygamy but don't understand that as a man you gonna have to provide. Plus multiple kids,so your budget is gonna take a major dent. Plus if polygamy is legalized rich nikka would scoop up all the bad chicks and nikkas would start complaining. :skip:

Yea, dudes need to be grateful polygamy is not legal. Alot of dudes would be single if their chick could legally marry a baller as his third or sixth wife and get a comeup. Dudes would be hurt.

Peace
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,407
Reputation
3,939
Daps
59,242
Reppin
NULL
Again, you can't get ALL the same entitlements of marriage by just coming up with informal contracts.

Marriage grants more rights and entitlements off top.

And you think that and that alone would entice rich men en masse (including those that aren't married now) to marry up all of the most attractive women?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,889
Reputation
-34,904
Daps
641,255
Reppin
The Deep State
And you think that and that alone would entice rich men en masse (including those that aren't married now) to marry up all of the most attractive women?
Bro. If even on average the "rich guys" marry an additional partner, thats twice as many women out of the dating pool.

Thats an "exponential effect" (metaphorically speaking) for every additional woman.

Just think about that in major cities man.

If you have 100 rich guys...if even 20 of them marry two women. Thats 40 women off the table.

Now say 10,000 Rich guys do this out of the entire country. Thats 20,000 women bro.

If even 100,000 dudes making 100K do this, thats 200,000 women...AT A MINIMUM. Cause you're only assuming they each marry ONE additional.

That number would be 300,000 women if they each married 2 women.

The math alone is staggering.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,407
Reputation
3,939
Daps
59,242
Reppin
NULL
Bro. If even on average the "rich guys" marry an additional partner, thats twice as many women out of the dating pool.

Thats an "exponential effect" (metaphorically speaking) for every additional woman.

Just think about that in major cities man.

If you have 100 rich guys...if even 20 of them marry two women. Thats 40 women off the table.

Now say 10,000 Rich guys do this out of the entire country. Thats 20,000 women bro.

If even 100,000 dudes making 100K do this, thats 200,000 women...AT A MINIMUM. Cause you're only assuming they each marry ONE additional.

That number would be 300,000 women if they each married 2 women.

The math alone is staggering.

You didn't answer my question.
 

Lo-Co

........
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
24,074
Reputation
7,626
Daps
55,488
Reppin
NYC
Rumor is one of these coli nikkas traded nudes from ****. And one of them had phone sex with **** who disguised his voice into a women using a device. :mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol:
:waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat::gladbron::gladbron::laff:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,889
Reputation
-34,904
Daps
641,255
Reppin
The Deep State
You didn't answer my question.
Yeah I did.

You keep trying to say, "well every rich guy isn't doing it"

It doesn't matter. People are lazy and won't jump through hoops.

I already said there are "kept men/women" I get that.

But they're not automatically legally entitled to certain benefits and representation in the eyes of the law.

Just cause the star athlete might have a harem doesn't mean he's legally bound to them or that he CAN be...
 
Top