Take your L and KIM.
Are you crazy, or do you just play crazy on the Coli for laughs?
I'm the one who said he needed to sit until he could move. Was he not moving FAR better out there than he was in Game 1?
I'm the one who said that they didn't need Kyrie to beat the Hawks. Were the Cavs not still way too much for Atlanta even without him?
You're the one who said that he shouldn't miss any games, that an extra "day or two" of rest wouldn't help. Did those two games off not help?
You're the one who said that he needed to play to "get his rhythm back". Did he look like he needed to get his rhythm back when he started on fire from the moment he got on the court?
The extra days off
obviously helped Kyrie. And you're rock-headed enough to tag me
four times trying to act like you were somehow proven right?
Now, if it were me, I still wouldn't have played him in this game either, because they didn't need him yet and he could have re-aggravated the injury. And there are lots of people that agree with me. But the substance of our argument was whether or not he needed to sit down and rest a few games when he was struggling in Game 1 - and I obviously owned you on that one.