Poster of the Year
Literally the only comment about Hersh that I made in this thread was:
It's definitely plausible and has precedent, but I don't think he's given anything to back up the claims.
Are you responding to that? Because I already made clear that I'm not putting any faith in Hersh's credibility. He's broken some incredible stories and he seems to be making some blunders too. So I don't rate this one in either direction. I didn't say we should believe anything on Hersh's say-so.
If you're not responding to the comment where I already made my thoughts clear, exactly what are you responding to?