North Korea can hit anywhere on the mainland United States

intra vires

Glory to Michigan
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,132
Reputation
1,535
Daps
14,757
Reppin
The Catholepistemiad
If this shyt is a legit threat, like this psycho can reach mainland US with a nuclear armed missile, then I don't see any other option but a military action asap. I'm sure there are already plans if this situation ever materialized.

So you want to use a military option against a country that could allegedly nuke anywhere in the continental US?:patrice:

The entire point of getting nukes is to protect oneself from regime change prompted by a hostile foreign power. There's no incentive for actually using a nuke, Kim isn't that stupid, it's merely for deterrence.

The US plan regarding North Korea thus far has been to underestimate their capabilities and be surprised when they demonstrate they're further along than intel suggested.

There's no military option that doesn't end in millions of deaths and regional destabilization. Quite frankly, the military option has been off the table for quite sometime...
 

BoBurnz

Superstar
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,499
Reputation
800
Daps
16,171
The US was never the major driving factor for regime change to begin with, nor was nuclear the biggest deterrent.

China says NK stays and fat Kim sits on the throne, NK stays and he sits on the throne. That's been the situation for a long ass time. Nukes do little to change it, all he needs to do is piss off his Chinese masters enough and he's dead. They just don't want to deal with the $$$ to rebuild the region, and here's a secret.

The US and South Korea don't want that either.

The biggest thing is that this may prompt other rogue states to attempt to barter with them for a nuke.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,501
Reputation
4,277
Daps
115,503
Reppin
Detroit
So you want to use a military option against a country that could allegedly nuke anywhere in the continental US?:patrice:

It's stupid, but that's probably what Trump will want to do. :francis:

But considering Trump's ineptness and the high likelihood of this being :duck: anyway, he'll probably settle for more Twitter beef with Kim Jong Un.
 

Soymuscle Mike

Formerly known as Vincenzo Corleone
Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
11,945
Reputation
5,163
Daps
59,347
Reppin
Sweetlake City
Funny names they have though "Hwasong " "Taepodong"

Careful with this shyt breh, NK goons aiming their nuke for yo IP address like

giphy.gif
 

hu3ypdadon

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
3,503
Reputation
-539
Daps
10,841
Reppin
NULL
North Korea not bein smart right now..We should really be prayin for them in these times :francis:..They playin with Devil
 

Copy Ninja

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
9,641
Reputation
741
Daps
34,395
So you want to use a military option against a country that could allegedly nuke anywhere in the continental US?:patrice:

The entire point of getting nukes is to protect oneself from regime change prompted by a hostile foreign power. There's no incentive for actually using a nuke, Kim isn't that stupid, it's merely for deterrence.

The US plan regarding North Korea thus far has been to underestimate their capabilities and be surprised when they demonstrate they're further along than intel suggested.

There's no military option that doesn't end in millions of deaths and regional destabilization. Quite frankly, the military option has been off the table for quite sometime...

If this is another negotiating tactic and our officials know that then agreed no military action will take place.

However, the Western propaganda on Kim has been that of an unstable despot willing to do whatever it takes to destroy the US. And if we truly believe he would send nukes our way, what other choice do the administration have? Million deaths there or million deaths here?

Add in the Trump variable :francis:

Hope I'm way off on this and nothing crazy happens though:yeshrug:
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,301
Reppin
NYC
If this is another negotiating tactic and our officials know that then agreed no military action will take place.

However, the Western propaganda on Kim has been that of an unstable despot willing to do whatever it takes to destroy the US. And if we truly believe he would send nukes our way, what other choice do the administration have? Million deaths there or million deaths here?

Add in the Trump variable :francis:

Hope I'm way off on this and nothing crazy happens though:yeshrug:
You call it propaganda, but then imply that is the actual intelligence assessment of Kim and base your solution on it:what:
 

Copy Ninja

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
9,641
Reputation
741
Daps
34,395
You call it propaganda, but then imply that is the actual intelligence assessment of Kim and base your solution on it:what:


it's a hypothetical if/then statement not a solution:stopitslime:

Let me ask you this, IF we know that they can reach us with nuclear missiles, what would you have the administration do?:patrice:
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,301
Reppin
NYC
it's a hypothetical if/then statement not a solution:stopitslime:

Let me ask you this, IF we know that they can reach us with nuclear missiles, what would you have the administration do?:patrice:
It was a solution based on your hypothetical. A ridiculous one at that, as the deaths of hundreds of thousands of our allies' civilians in South Korea, Japan, etc would most definitely follow any kind of military action. Not to mention potential open conflict with the Chinese.

There is nothing to be done here but prolonged negotiation and stalemate. There needs to be an acceptance that regime change is not feasible and the rhetoric needs to be toned back significantly.
 
Top