NYT: Boeing Was Certifying Its Own Safety For the 737 Max

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,419
Reputation
4,600
Daps
89,680
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Sounds like deregulation. Something you support.

But like a typical conservative when she doesn't fall in line with your fantasy you look to deflect blame.

:scust:

Lol so what's the alternative? Allow the company to regulate themselves which is essentially what happened here?? I mean you're literally making the case for regulation
A private regulator with actual liability.
People have died under govt. regulation, and no one has been locked up.
shyt is a joke.
Can’t imagine people preferring this to a system where heads actually roll when shyt goes this wrong.

Even now, you are downplaying govt. culpability :scust:and emphasizing Boeings role.
This public sector infallibility when interacting with the private sector is extremely problematic in my opinion.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,419
Reputation
4,600
Daps
89,680
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
This idiot is arguing for regulation while saying you need to deregulate? This dude is a retard for real. :mindblown:
I dont expect a dweeb like you to understand the difference between private and public...:rudy: and i really don’t remember fukking your girl, but I apologize. Get over it.
 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
38,045
Reputation
1,458
Daps
64,696
Reppin
got a call for three nines
A private regulator with actual liability.
People have died under govt. regulation, and no one has been locked up.
shyt is a joke.
Can’t imagine people preferring this to a system where heads actually roll when shyt goes this wrong.

Even now, you are downplaying govt. culpability :scust:and emphasizing Boeings role.
This public sector infallibility when interacting with the private sector is extremely problematic in my opinion.

Ie Boeing

:mjlol: /
 

PoorAndDangerous

Superstar
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
9,610
Reputation
1,162
Daps
34,675
A private regulator with actual liability.
People have died under govt. regulation, and no one has been locked up.
shyt is a joke.
Can’t imagine people preferring this to a system where heads actually roll when shyt goes this wrong.

Even now, you are downplaying govt. culpability :scust:and emphasizing Boeings role.
This public sector infallibility when interacting with the private sector is extremely problematic in my opinion.
Which private aviation regulator would you like to use?
 

Strapped

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,753
Reputation
5,298
Daps
62,701
Reppin
404
Epa , fcc , puc , nrc , sba , faa , fda & whatever else i missed are ran by the corporations they are suppose to oversee :russ::mjlol::scust:
 
Last edited:

el_oh_el

Bulls On Parade...
Supporter
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
10,405
Reputation
1,925
Daps
26,244
Reppin
H-Town
Private + regulator is a fukking oxymoron. They are damn near mutually exclusive. What private body will take up the risk and responsibility of, in this case, the FAA, without demanding exorbitant cost for doing so? Theres no profit motive to regulation. The shyt literally makes zero logical sense, and I am unsure as to if this is a good-faith argument or not (it likely is not)
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,419
Reputation
4,600
Daps
89,680
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Holy f*ck, It’s about accountability...:snoop:
There will be failures either way.
Liberals just see “private” or “market” and lose their shyt.


:bryan:@ govt being run from top to bottom by the corporations it’s regulating and the answer being more govt.
Tax payers really getting fleeced out here.

Favor unaccountable actors brehs:mjlol:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,419
Reputation
4,600
Daps
89,680
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Private + regulator is a fukking oxymoron. They are damn near mutually exclusive. What private body will take up the risk and responsibility of, in this case, the FAA, without demanding exorbitant cost for doing so? Theres no profit motive to regulation. The shyt literally makes zero logical sense, and I am unsure as to if this is a good-faith argument or not (it likely is not)
:ohhh:Oh you aren’t willing to pay the price to prevent shyt like this... that’s an honest answer.
:hubie:Fair enough.
 
Top