spliz
SplizThaDon
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 66,928
- Reputation
- 11,109
- Daps
- 224,015
- Reppin
- NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
No. It’s about the reasons they rate it the way they do. The game is literally getting criticized for shyt other games get praised for. If there was something wrong with the core mechanics I can see it. But u can’t criticize this open world game for lack of story while u praise games like Elden Ring and BOTW and they suffer from the same issue. U can’t say a game isn’t long enough after u spent 120+ hours rushing thru it and still haven’t finished it. U can’t complain about bosses being too hard when u admit u didn’t loot or anything to build ur character up before u faced them. U gotta use discernment when it comes to these reviews my guy. It’s not just about the score. It’s about what’s inside the review that tells the story. U also gotta look at the person who is rating the game’s history. These people will get someone who doesn’t like the genre to give a review on the game. IGN is notorious for this type of shyt. They pulled that shyt with their Code Veronica Remaster review. The dumb chick who reviewed it gave it like a 4/10 meanwhile IGN themselves gave the original game like a 9.5 when it came out. But the person they had review it wasn’t a fan of older RE games and didn’t understand the mechanics at all.I promise you this game ain’t gonna be Elden ring or BOTW lol
Y’all really too invested in this no name ass publisher
This game could truly just be just ok, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Reviewers who played the game aren’t wrong for not rating it as highly as generation defining games lol
Last edited:





Lets wait til it comes out