I almost prefer your previous post, because at least that was entertaining. This is not only boring, it's totally false. When you make a claim like "most" we're gonna need a citation. Most industrial jobs were absolutely not lost by the 1970s. Economists from all parts of the spectrum have not shown that incomes of the middle class have increased WHATSOEVER, let alone to the low costs of goods. I already explained to you that the essentials people purchase on a day to day basis are more expensive today that they were in 1986. You're trying to paint this as a natural evolution but it is a political one. You see China liberalized in the early 1980's and the free trade crowd later in the decade, like your home girl HRC who was a Wal-Mart executive (conflict of interest much?), saw a golden opportunity to cut labor costs, and then sold the American people a big pile of steaming shyt called NAFTA. They promised hundreds of thousands, no MILLIONS of jobs, and that never happened. If they had tried to sell people on your strange social/societal engineering, people would have said GTFO. The facts are that free trade has been at very best a net -neutral to American society, and that is being exceedingly generous to your side. The only thing that has increased astronomically and noticeably is corporate profits. That is a fact. Any chart shows that corporate profits since trade liberalization have been increased astronomically, while their taxes and percentage of the federal budget contribution have been cut to a fraction as they increased control over the government.
I only drop these level of jewels for you to soak up once, young Hillary stan. Don't get caught lackin again
