If Wall didn't have that extra year on his contract he would've been perfect to take on with multiple picks. How is Deion Waiter's contract? Also you can just be patient and wait for Igoudala type of contract dumps.
A) As much as we hate him, Randle is not an abomination of a player that should be traded for the 2nd worst contract in the league. He's on a good contract and if he gets back to his NOP production, he can be traded for a net positive.
You're responding to a point I'm not making. I agree that he's not a horrible player... But CP3 is still a better one. And in my trade scenario I'm not only trading Randle, but another non-compatible/redundant piece in Elfrid Payton. Two career negative long range shooters.
B) When we trade Morris for a 1st round pick that will open up a lot of space. Also a new GM/coach who is not beholden to Randle's success can sit him down and explain how we intend to play proper team basketball.
You're hoping for a lot. You have to hope at the end of the year at the earliest Dolan can find a competent GM. Then that "competent" GM has to hire a competent coach. Then you have to hope above all hope that Julius Randle is not only willing to listen to both, but is also capable of changing his entire approach to the game when he's never shown the inclination to do so before. If one of those hopes goes sideways, you're all supposition goes by the wayside. Worst case scenario I'm a CP3 acquisition is he becomes an average PG that we're over-paying for.
C) As
@seemorecizzy already mentioned CP3 is a dirtbag. He's had issues with Blake, Rivers, Harden and all of that very publicly. Also DSJ spent much of this off-season training with CP3
You're naming Star players that he's beefed with on teams competing for chips. I'm looking to a team like the one he's on to see if he's being called a cancer or to see if he's not helping the young PG's there
D) With CP3 here you'll have to say goodbye to at least one of DSJ/Frank.
Unless you trade Elfrid for him
Best case scenario with CP3 is 7-8th seed, automatic first round eliminations and higher/worse draft picks. So just delaying the proper rebuild for 3 years.
Like you said BEST-CASE SCENARIO. And the hope is that if that team is that good with an aged CP3, they'll be that good without him with a grip of cap space when his contract is off the books.
He's guaranteed $4 million for the 3rd year. After the 2nd year Knicks will waive him and owe him that $4 million which will be counted against the cap.
Against the cap in the third year. You are assuming the Knicks will waive a 20 and 10 player to save 15.8 million instead of doing nothing so they can attempt to trade him in-season. You're assuming they're gonna want to pay him 4 million to go away instead of getting something in return for him.
Why the fukk would Knicks pay him $19 million when they could just take a $4 million cap hit which will be roughly 3% of the cap. That's basically having to sign a vet minimum player instead of Reggie Bullock. Clear incentive to waive him is the possibility that he keeps playing like hot garbage.
He won't
While CP3 would be taking up 30% of the cap with his contract.
Yep
CP3 also does nothing for our future. Picture top free agents hyped to commit long-term to a team with a 36 year old CP3 on his last legs
What top free agents are you looking at in 2020 or 2021 that you think we can reasonably get if our youngs don't make a leap that they never had under the Knicks in the last 20 years? Committing to a rebuild doesn't only mean having cap flexibility (which we don't have a lot of anyway) but also means committing to developing our young talent in a positive way. You're not developing Randle much more than what he is and he's not a veteran piece who would help the young players grow the way a Morris currently is.
Only difference between Randle and CP3 is the fact that CP3 has an extra year on his contract, is 10 years older, will only get worse, will only get more injury prone, will be even more untradable, will cost us the possibility of acquiring better picks/assets and have us positioned worse in the draft.