One second you're arguing with your neighbor, the next second you are getting murdered

[Lexx Diamond]

they are turning america into the places they came from where this type of violence over the smallest things is normal.

same thing happens in venezuela, colombia, mexico and all these other countries that are flooding us with migrants

That happened in Costa Rica. Dude that got merked was from Nicaragua.

 

[Lord_nikon]

Looks Florida ??

 

[RubioTheCruel]

Looks Florida ??

It's Costa Rica

Video revela cómo ocurrió el atroz homicidio de hombre acribillado por vecino en lujoso condominio

Una cámara de seguridad captó el momento exacto en el que se dieron los disparos.

www.lateja.cr

 

[Mowgli]

Hoe ass dude wow. To think, if hed studied Brazilljan Jiujitsh that entire matter would have been resolved civily.

Always a woman in the middle of mens business stirring up the pot. Then wanna talk all that miho BULLshyt. Both of these dudes really following their women to death. Prpbably sitting at home being torture nagged for months abput some trivial issue. Just to create a collision.

Borderline simp crime

This happened because theyre fighting for who uses the water. When the valve is opened other units are effected. The guy who got shots wife opened the valve, a cat fight insued and someone got killed. Leave your woman inside. Shes just going to mud up something that can be worked out

 

[ThrobbingHood]

That's 100% of the population. Nobody knows what's gonna happen going about their day. That's why you're supposed to practice diffusing situations and settle disputes like an adult. Getting angry and hollering can make things worse and that's what happened in this situation.


And no, I'm not taking good with the bad. I'll be single peaceful bald incel monk before I have to deal with a woman who can't control herself. You can keep that.

Plus she knew her husband was carrying. And yet she still escalated the situation knowing this.

 

[CP3.]

Nah son. That's not the way guns solve problems.

Brandishing is illegal, shooting them is 50/50 you may get off on a shooting. You're not sitting in front of a judge and explaining why you were brandishing.

If you pull a gun out, you pull it out as a last resort and you use it. It's not a bargaining tool, it's not used to threat or intimidate, negotiate, start a conversation or discussion.

I wasn't talking about from a court of law POV. I'm talking about from a everyday life, don't wanna kill someone POV.

Plus I'm sure any competent lawyer could make a solid enough case that the "brandishing" was for self defence purposes.

If you pull a gun out, you pull it out as a last resort and you use it. It's not a bargaining tool, it's not used to threat or intimidate, negotiate, start a conversation or discussion.

So you would rather shoot someone dead and ruin multiple lives instead of pulling it out to let them know 'look bruh, I can end this right here if I have to'? Only a suicidal idiot is still gonna throw hands at you at that point.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

The coli will tell you that the shooter would get off because self defense. But I think with a gun, if you can avoid a situation, 100% you're liable.

Thats that gun nut rationale. It amazes me how many people don't understand what self defence is. But they also fee justified to use a gun. Like how about learning how to avoid a murder charge by actually learning what constitutes self defence. But when you tell em they argue. It's not a debate it's your freedom at jeopardy lol. You can be as right as you want sitting in a cell for life.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

I wasn't talking about from a court of law POV. I'm talking about from a everyday life, don't wanna kill someone POV.

Plus I'm sure any competent lawyer could make a solid enough case that the "brandishing" was for self defence purposes.



So you would rather shoot someone dead and ruin multiple lives instead of pulling it out to let them know 'look bruh, I can end this right here if I have to'. Only a suicidal idiot is still gonna throw hands at you at that point.

And this is what I'm talking about

a decent lawyer would argue it was menacing and an unessesary escalation given the nature of the threat.

From what I saw before video went down. They went to the neighbors house. That's already on the offensive. This idea that you can shoot people then just make up a decent enough cover story is something that keeps prison full. It's something really common with gun carriers and quite blizzard to be honest. That's not reality. If you take the same scenario and put these same people there and they don't have guns , they would be far less quicker to violence. Humans fail to account for the psychological effect of carrying a gun. Something proven in studies already.

Dude needs life in prison.

 

[Big Boda]

That machismo shyt is no joke. be having dudes literally die over the most trivial issues

If it wasn't a gun it would be a machete. Life is nothing to some of them foreigners. It's like stepping on an ant to em.

 

[verbalkint]

So you would rather shoot someone dead and ruin multiple lives instead of pulling it out to let them know 'look bruh, I can end this right here if I have to'? Only a suicidal idiot is still gonna throw hands at you at that point.

The problem is you have now become the threat and dude is within his rights to pop off, on the pull out even if his reflexes fast enough before you get your threat off.

 

[King Poetic]

That was like 9 shots

He gone away for life and both ladies will probably have to sell the house and move on

 

[King Poetic]

Apparently the victims wife is the shooters sister

Wait hold up

fukking relatives

 

[Pazzy]

stupidity all around.

 

[CP3.]

The problem is you have now become the threat and dude is within his rights to pop off, on the pull out even if his reflexes fast enough before you get your threat off.

Seriously? I just don't understand this rationale at all. The system is all fukked up in that case.

Act 1: Dude throws a punch at me
Act 2: I pull my gun out and shoot him and he dies (even if i only fired once)
Act 3: I get off in court because it was self defence.

That's right?

However...

Act 1: Dude throws a punch at me
Act 2: I pull my gun out to try and make him stop
Act 3: I get charged in court for brandishing and "becoming the threat"?

The system would rather you follow through with it and actively shoot/kill someone instead of just warning them? Why is pulling the gun out when you're attacked by someone considered as "you becoming the threat"?

 

[bigde09]

Reminds me of the cacs that killed each other over shoveling snow a few years ago