Only 4.5 GB of ram available to games on ps4

[Rico]

its ok to be upset

 

[marcuz]

That's pretty much due to their really talented
first party teams.
There are too many examples of the 360
stomping a hole in the ps3 when it came to real
world performance for ANYONE to believe it's superior
in 2013.

like what? yall trying to revise history. a lot of multiplatform games came out better on xbox because it was easier for devs to port. when it comes to exclusive titles tho, ps3 proved to be leagues head of xbox exclusives.

 

[iceberg_is_on_fire]

How you know what we won't see??
Breh I'm going by past consoles. PS3 and 360 were "theoretically" close yet PS3 exclusives blew 360 exclusives away graphically despite them being close right??

No first party game from Microsoft used an engine primarily built on the 360. Many used Unreal Engine. Lost Odyssey, Gears of War, Too Human, etc. Of all of the Microsoft Studios there are, Rare has always been the top tier team and Turn 10 has grown into one. When Microsoft gave them the money and the power to outdo Gran Turismo visually, they did that in spades.

However, for games that come from top shelf developers, like Rare, you get a Banjo & Kazooie Nuts and Bolts, that has polygons as far as the eye can see, tons of geometry, amazing textures as well. That stands up there with the best of them, from either console.

 

[Ineedmoney504]

shyt is sad, and now the same nikkaz in here copping pleas, smh, atleast Microsoft tells u upfront and is real, sony does sneak shyt and hides shyt, and tell u they giving 7 gigs to devs to make yall go crazy and then when yall hop on the bandwagon they pull your seat from under u

thats what i was saying from the start, most of these nikkaz already had they mind made up before sony or microsoft said anything about next gen, they said they would never pay for online, they get no games at e3 and are happy, now they get lied to and act like its no big deal, this made my choice on which one im getting first real easy

 

[spliz]

fukk it...I ain't gettin NONE of these shyts at launch...cancelling my preorder...both these companies ain't shyt...

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

.......................

 

[King Sun]

shyt is sad, and now the same nikkaz in here copping pleas, smh, atleast Microsoft tells u upfront and is real, sony does sneak shyt and hides shyt, and tell u they giving 7 gigs to devs to make yall go crazy and then when yall hop on the bandwagon they pull your seat from under u

thats what i was saying from the start, most of these nikkaz already had they mind made up before sony or microsoft said anything about next gen, they said they would never pay for online, they get no games at e3 and are happy, now they get lied to and act like its no big deal, this made my choice on which one im getting first real easy

where did you get that from? and you dudes are pathetic

 

[Insensitive]

Ps4 does video chat, multi tasking etc too. xbots in heavy spinning mode.

You do know the xbox did all of that LAST generation right ?
I'm gonna be from laughter if you say some shyt like
"It charges the controller while it's off !" or "I don't even have to
install my games when they finish downloading !" or "It does downloads when it's turned off !!!" :O

like what? yall trying to revise history. a lot of multiplatform games came out better on xbox because it was easier for devs to port. when it comes to exclusive titles tho, ps3 proved to be leagues head of xbox exclusives.

There are several examples just google "Xbox 360 runs better".
The reason for this is because of the superior GPU in the 360,
that's just the facts jack.

A good example is Mafia 2, several things were
omitted in the ps3 version because the GPU just couldn't cut it.
Crysis ? Crysis 2 ? Crysis 3 ? Bayonetta ? Grand Theft Auto 4 ?
The Orange Box ? etc.

For the record I own both, and play both regularly.

 

[marcuz]

You do know the xbox did all of that LAST generation right ?
I'm gonna be from laughter if you say some shyt like
"It charges the controller while it's off !" or "I don't even have to
install my games when they finish downloading !" or "It does downloads when it's turned off !!!" :O


There are several examples just google "Xbox 360 runs better".
The reason for this is because of the superior GPU in the 360,
that's just the facts jack.

A good example is Mafia 2, several things were
omitted in the ps3 version because the GPU just couldn't cut it.
Crysis ? Crysis 2 ? Crysis 3 ? Bayonetta ? Grand Theft Auto 4 ?
The Orange Box ? etc.

For the record I own both, and play both regularly.

so are you not denying that ps3 exclusives come out better than xbox 360 exclusives? all you're sayin is multiplatforms often run better on 360, which i've acknowledged.

 

[spliz]

You do know the xbox did all of that LAST generation right ?
I'm gonna be from laughter if you say some shyt like
"It charges the controller while it's off !" or "I don't even have to
install my games !" or "It does downloads when it's turned off !!!" :O


There are several examples just google "Xbox 360 runs better".
The reason for this is because of the superior GPU in the 360,
that's just the facts jack.

A good example is Mafia 2, several things were
omitted in the ps3 version because the GPU just couldn't cut it.
Crysis ? Crysis 2 ? Crysis 3 ? Bayonetta ? Grand Theft Auto 4 ?
The Orange Box ? etc.

For the record I own both, and play both regularly.

Ur wrong...it's not as cut and dry as u making it...360 was able to do SOME things better such as ambient lighting etc...but overall no...it WAS NOT more powerful than the PS3...just easier to develop for...some games ran better on the 360..some on the PS3...that's the facts...PS3 exclusives was where it was at console wise graphically...that's the facts...while games like Crysis etc...was better on 360...games like Darksiders..COD4..Tomb Raider..Battlefield 3 etc ran better on PS3...and I've always had both as well...alot of the time when the 360 version of the game ran better it was due lazyness on the Devs end...such as GTA4...that shyt even runs terrible on PC..which is farmore powerful than both consoles...

 

[Ineedmoney504]

where did you get that from? and you dudes are pathetic

so sony didnt promote that they were all about games and had 7 gigs for gaming and 1 for the os? and didnt u sony stans keep posting 7>>>>>>>5, now it comes out they omitted a bunch of shyt just to get yall hyped, now it comes out and its no big deal

i been saying ps stans was lame ass nikkaz, but damn yall on another level of lame now

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

.......................

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

.......................

 

[Insensitive]

Ur wrong...it's not as cut and dry as u making it...360 was able to do SOME things better such as ambient lighting etc...but overall no...it WAS NOT more powerful than the PS3...just easier to develop for...some games ran better on the 360..some on the PS3...that's the facts...PS3 exclusives was where it was at console wise graphically...that's the facts...while games like Crysis was better on 360...games like Tomb Raider..Battlefield 3 etc ran better on PS3...

so are you not denying that ps3 exclusives come out better than xbox 360 exclusives? all you're sayin is multiplatforms often run better on 360, which i've acknowledged.

No.
It really is as cut and dry as I'm putting it.
I don't know if you guys care about reading tech sites
but here :
Beyond3D

Is a good place to start.
There are several topics discussing the performance of the 2 machines.

The Ps3's GPU is lacking and because of this many tasks are done on cell that'd
normally be done on the GPU. While on 360 you don't have to worry about
divvying up your GPU code and throwing it on the SPU's.

That is partly why so many games just outright performed better on the 360
because the GPU was being put through the ringer on the ps3.
A lot of this was remedied because developers started working on
the ps3 first, taking into account it's weaknesses then porting to
360 because it's easier that way.
And I'm not just saying they're running better I'm telling you WHY.

 

[spliz]

No.
It really is as cut and dry as I'm putting it.
I don't know if you guys care about reading tech sites
but here :
Beyond3D

Is a good place to start.
There are several topics discussing the performance of the 2 machines.

The Ps3's GPU is lacking and because of this many tasks are done on cell that'd
normally be done on the GPU. While on 360 you don't have to worry about
divvying up your GPU code and throwing it on the SPU's.

That is partly why so many games just outright performed better on the 360
because the GPU was being put through the ringer on the ps3.
A lot of this was remedied because developers started working on
the ps3 first, taking into account it's weaknesses then porting to
360 because it's easier that way.

All ur showing me is what I already know...PS3 is harder to develop for..it doesn't mean the overall system is LESS powerful...and anyone who says it's cut and dry doesn't know what they talkin bout..cause it isnt..the GPU in the 360 is stronger...but like i said...overall power of each system isn't as simple as that...