Link to the lie. I see alot of posts but no actual evidence from sony?Sony lied to ya bytchasses![]()
That didnt bother you though. Then when they took it off xbots said, no more drm.
Microsoft isnt done fukkin you yet though.
Link to the lie. I see alot of posts but no actual evidence from sony?
Lets let sony confirm this first before you have a baby in your boxers bruh. Lying is what Microsoft did to you about DRM saying, its not DRM its the cloud.That didnt bother you though. Then when they took it off xbots said, no more drm.
Microsoft isnt done fukkin you yet though.

The hell you talking about 
Again, wait for the confirmation. You just sound like a rabid xbot right now. Happy to report gossip, like a bytch.Ya'll dumbasses better stop trying to make it a fact in the-coli then
The hell you talking about
![]()
Son..same way the GPU is stronger in the 360...the Sony's Cell processor is FAR stronger than the 360's processor fam...most people who review both systems and weigh the pros and cons they almost ALWAYS come out dead even... and then it all boils down to the games for the most part..but like i said..the gap between multiplats closed A WHILE ago...it all boils down to SOME games run and better on one..some run and look better on the other..and if it's a significant difference...9 times outta 10 it's dev related...real talk..which is why as powerful as the PC is some ports run horrible on it..GTA4 for instance...overall..best graphics this gen console wise comes from the PS3 exclusives majority of the time...I gave you a link that'll tell y
in fact I'll give you a link that points to specific issues :
PS3 hardware design choices - good or bad? *spawn - Beyond3D Forum
The ps3 is FACTUALLY weaker in some areas it just happens to
be areas that matter a great deal in rendering games.
This isn't opinion or a matter of difficulty, several developers have come forth and stated this.
For example the ps3 has terrible fill rate and titles
that took advantage of this on 360, struggled when they came to
ps3.
And no, those guys on that website know plenty, there are several
developers and professionals who post there, it may not be fun to read
though for people who have no interest in game design or software development (the latter
being my career choice and game design being a hobby I have interest in. )
There wasn't any real "Superiority" on either platform because over all they're stupidly close in performance, at least once developers developers got up to par on the ps3 which happened a couple
years ago yet there were still certain games that performed better because of what the developer was
ultimately going for.
And even then we don't have an example to check against if we only use first party
titles, though it's not like they're lacking visually on the 360 :
Halo Reach
Halo 4
Alan Wake
and the
Gears of War trilogy
All of these games look fantastic, as well as the myriad of multiplatform titles
that run better due to distinct advantages hardware wise.
Again, wait for the confirmation. You just sound like a rabid xbot right now. Happy to report gossip, like a bytch.


Im trying to figure out what you're happy about. There isnt one spec that xbox one has shown to be superior over ps4. Misery loves company i guess.Well damn i must have made the damn thread
You seem kinda mad![]()
This doesn't make any sense. How does Sony go from 512 MB for OS when the system had only 4GB of RAM, to now needing almost 3.5 GB? Doesn't make sense for Sony to add 4 more GB of RAM just to do more OS stuff. I'm calling bullshyt on this article till Sony gives an official response.
If it turns out to be true then this is bad news for gamers. Looks like this will be another lost gen like the last.
Sad self entitled xbot nerds think every rumor that have a parade about needs to be validated/invalidated in a couple hours.