Paul George Trade Thread

Should the Lakers trade Brandon Ingram and Loul Deng for Paul George?


  • Total voters
    57
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
69,602
Reputation
31,125
Daps
412,571
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
Don't know how much of a threat Cleveland actually is.....

Jimmy Butler told them he didn't want to be traded to them or play for their team and they backed off even though he's still got two more years on his contract. PG13's contract is expiring, so if they're not going to gamble on Butler why would they gamble on Paul George who is even more of a risk to leave.

When did I miss THAT:whoo:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,271
Daps
241,480
shyt getting like 20 daps, and not 24 hours later....






:ufdup:

The Cleveland Cavaliers remain seriously interested in trading for Chicago's Jimmy Butler or Indiana's Paul George, but have encountered significant obstacles on both fronts, according to league sources.

Sources said on Tuesday that the Cavaliers have been notified that Butler hopes to stay with the Bulls and would be reluctant to commit his long-term future to Cleveland. Butler, sources said, remains intent on trying to lead the Bulls back to Eastern Conference prominence.



To land either Butler or George, sources say, Cleveland knows it would have to assemble a three-team (or more) trade --- likely costing the Cavs All-Star forward Kevin Love -- to manufacture the top-five draft pick Chicago and Indiana are known to covet in exchange for surrendering their respective best players.

:lolbron::troll:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,112
Reppin
the ether
@The Dankster

Another prediction of yours coming up short. :troll:


LeBron stans y'all. :scust:


What prediction, goofball? :why:

You legit thought of me three times when this happened? I stay in your head. :skip:

I said it's what the Cavs should do. I was made fun of by people claiming the Bulls would never do it, when it appears quite clear that they are open to the possibility. When the hell did I predict that Jimmy Buckets would want to do it?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,271
Daps
241,480
What prediction, you autistic goofball? :why:
Here I was thinking you weren't as childish as these other clowns on here with this ad hominem nonsense. Obviously not.

:picard:
You legit thought of me three times when this happened? I stay in your head. :skip:
Obviously, you can't take a joke, hence the :troll:which I posted TWICE - I think that "autistic goofball" comment applies more to you don't you think?
When was the last time you looked in the mirror? How many times have you tried this "looks like another prediction of yours is wrong" shyt with me, or tagged me over shyt you've taken out of context, trying to get a win over me? Seriously how many times have you done that?

Clearly you don't like the taste of your own medicine. You've been on some hoe shyt ever since the Finals.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,271
Daps
241,480
I said it's what the Cavs should do. I was made fun of by people claiming the Bulls would never do it, when it appears quite clear that they are open to the possibility. When the hell did I predict that Jimmy Buckets would want to do it?
And where are you getting this from? I haven't seen any reports that GarPax are open to trading Butler to the Cavs. :jbhmm:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,112
Reppin
the ether
Here I was thinking you weren't as childish as these other clowns on here with this ad hominem nonsense. Obviously not.

:picard:

Obviously, you can't take a joke, hence the :troll:which I posted TWICE - I think that "autistic goofball" comment applies more to you don't you think?
When was the last time you looked in the mirror? How many times have you tried this "looks like another prediction of yours is wrong" shyt with me, or tagged me over shyt you've taken out of context, trying to get a win over me? Seriously how many times have you done that?

Clearly you don't like the taste of your own medicine. You've been on some hoe shyt ever since the Finals.
And where are you getting this from? I haven't seen any reports that GarPax are open to trading Butler to the Cavs. :jbhmm:

Two more quotes. :dead:


The only times I have EVER quoted you were when we were in the same conversation, or when I actually got proven right by an event.


You quote me for no reason. Like when the Thunder beat the Spurs, you tried to rub it in my face multiple times...because I said Durant would go to a contender! :heh:

I never said that Durant wouldn't beat the Spurs. That backfired on you.


Now when Butler said he doesn't want to go to Cleveland, you're quoting me because I said...that the Cavs should trade for Butler? :aicmon:

What does Butler not wanting to go to Cleveland have anything to do with what I said? :dahell:



And the reports that Griffin was "arms deep" in Butler trade talks, and that Butler's opinion was solicited on the issue, prove that the Bulls were at least entertaining the idea.



I've said for two years - you maintain zero ability to evaluate your own arguments. When I'm wrong, I admit it (like a couple weeks ago when that guy's typo made me think he was referring to Wade rather than Bosh). But you just can't do it. You dig in and in and in, and attribute all the faults in the conflict to your opponents. I'm biased in what I choose to mention and what I choose to argue about, but I know that I'm picking and choosing my battlefields - you just don't appear to have that sort of self-awareness, so you project any deficiencies you got onto others.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,271
Daps
241,480
Two more quotes. :dead:
What the fukk do you mean "two more quotes" - I was replying to your post that quoted me, I just split them into two. What is wrong with you? Am I not suppose to quote you when you quote me now?

:merchant:

The only times I have EVER quoted you were when we were in the same conversation, or when I actually got proven right by an event.
Nah, you've quoted and tagged me before when we weren't conversing thinking you were right or thinking I was wrong, or quoting me when I'm arguing with someone else. If you ever quote or tag me again without me initiating the conversation, I'm gonna call you out for being a hypocrite due to me 'staying in your head'.

You've been warned.

And the reports that Griffin was "arms deep" in Butler trade talks, and that Butler's opinion was solicited on the issue, prove that the Bulls were at least entertaining the idea.
Why can't you post any evidence of this? Here's my evidence for proving you're full of shyt -
The Cleveland Cavaliers remain seriously interested in trading for Chicago's Jimmy Butler or Indiana's Paul George, but have encountered significant obstacles on both fronts, according to league sources.

Sources said on Tuesday that the Cavaliers have been notified that Butler hopes to stay with the Bulls and would be reluctant to commit his long-term future to Cleveland. Butler, sources said, remains intent on trying to lead the Bulls back to Eastern Conference prominence.


To land either Butler or George, sources say, Cleveland knows it would have to assemble a three-team (or more) trade --- likely costing the Cavs All-Star forward Kevin Love -- to manufacture the top-five draft pick Chicago and Indiana are known to covet in exchange for surrendering their respective best players.
I've said for two years - you maintain zero ability to evaluate your own arguments. When I'm wrong, I admit it (like a couple weeks ago when that guy's typo made me think he was referring to Wade rather than Bosh). But you just can't do it. You dig in and in and in, and attribute all the faults in the conflict to your opponents. I'm biased in what I choose to mention and what I choose to argue about, but I know that I'm picking and choosing my battlefields - you just don't appear to have that sort of self-awareness, so you project any deficiencies you got onto others.

And you should have known better - I've pulled the autism card on you before when you stepped out of line. :ufdup:
Nah, you don't get to use these talking points after I've accused you of this many a time, well before you even did. You usually have your head on straight except whenever it concerns LeBron, and then you drown yourself in this dikkriding state, ignoring the reason and logic liferaft that's in reach. Like I said above, don't tag or quote me again unless I've addressed you first.

:ufdup:
 
Top