Penn State Study From 2021: How West Indians Practiced Housing Discrimination Against Black Americans To Rise In New York City

[Voice of Reason]

You know better than to quote me, you shyt-for-brains idiot. I didn't tell a single lie there. Go suck Tariq's dikk.

My great-grandparents were slaves, my great-grandmother was a slave on the Callaway Plantation. My fraternal grandmother grew up on that plantation, lived to see 91, and regularly told us stories about it. I'm a Black American. I verified that I'm Black. You're a moron and a troll who doesn't know how to think for themselves, and referees to Black youth as "low IQ crack babies." Stop quoting me.

Address the content at hand.


All of the insults don't change the fact that the Carribeans were seen as different than ADOS according to this study.

 

[HimmyHendrix]

Your thread title is completely misleading. The paper doesn't say West Indians practiced housing discrimination against African Americans, it actually says the opposite. It argues that West Indians disrupted white racial housing cartels and created access to property for Black people in general, not that they blocked it.
What is your motivation here with your lies and your constant running interference for white supremacy?

man this shyt DONT WORK NO MORE.

nothing misleading about the title. and the study is clear as day

you’re blatantly lying you fukk

 

[Blessings]

I'm negging you, not because I disagree with you, but for the disgusting over- dependence on AI. I don't come to a fukking forum, intended to foster conversation among humans, to read AI, much less several posts in a row. Yuck.

I don't care...duke is an agent of white supremacy spewing some BS.
Myself and others typed/speech-to-text on similar topics.

I copied and pasted from ChatGP for others who view this thread can have a quick reference and not be misled by OP including a study to validate the BS he spewing.

 

[tuckgod]

they can’t help themselves

the study literally says they went out of their way to let whites know they weren’t us and kept wealth inside of west indian enclaves

Their only concern is keeping the gaffle going.

Secrecy and conniving was their only tools.

Once the light comes on the roaches scatter.

 

[HimmyHendrix]

I just read the whole paper.

TLDR

West Indians chose to leave the islands and brought with them cash and homeowner "skills" they acquired in the islands with them. They acquired these assets because back in their homeland their cacs allowed them to somewhat own land and sell the goods that grew on them during slavery. So when they got here they used their history of dealing with cacs to persuade some into selling to them. For the ones without money they were able to get around whites and were primarily helped and sold to by the West Indians with money.



bumboclat

nikkas will ignore this whole post and say im lying

 

[Barlow]

Your thread title is completely misleading. The paper doesn't say West Indians practiced housing discrimination against African Americans, it actually says the opposite. It argues that West Indians disrupted white racial housing cartels and created access to property for Black people in general, not that they blocked it.
What is your motivation here with your lies and your constant running interference for white supremacy?

I didn't see anywhere it saying they sold to black Americans? However there are multiple instances of the paper citing that they lended and sold to exclusively West Indians.

 

[HimmyHendrix]

I don't care...duke is an agent of white supremacy spewing some BS.
Myself and others typed/speech-to-text on similar topics.

I copied and pasted from ChatGP for others who view this thread can have a quick reference and not be misled by OP including a study to validate the BS he spewing.

so why when i said that you put it through AI and didn’t read, you told me read the study even though at the point it was only up for 5-10 min.

you nigas can’t stop LYING

it’s a long and detailed study that covers so many subjects

even the way the AI interpreted “covering” as “white passing” was wrong because you need a human (like the writer of the study) to break down what that means and not some early AI to misconstrue the term.

 

[Uachet]

A.I. is not an effective means of arguing against points. You want to be effective, use the actual source or use experts talking about the source. A.I. is not an expert, and is incapable of understanding the nuiances of any argument, nor the cultural implications of any argument. It can't even determine if what it is relaying is correct.

"As of 2023, a typical AI model isn't assessing whether the information it provides is correct. Its goal when it receives a prompt is to generate what it thinks is the most likely string of words to answer that prompt. Sometimes this results in a correct answer, but sometimes it doesn’t – and the AI cannot interpret or distinguish between the two. It’s up to you to make the distinction.

AI can be wrong in multiple ways:

• It can give the wrong answer
• It can omit information by mistake
• It can make up completely fake people, events, and articles
• It can mix truth and fiction"

Research Guides: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information Literacy: What does AI get wrong?

Learn about how AI works and how to spot common errors AI tools tend to make. You'll also learn fact-checking and critical thinking strategies for AI, how to cite AI in an academic paper, and how to learn more in-depth about AI tools and issues.

lib.guides.umd.edu

So no, using A.I. to prove a point is not being intelligent, it is being wholy ignorant of the limits of A.I.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

I just read the whole paper.

TLDR

West Indians chose to leave the islands and brought with them cash and homeowner "skills" they acquired in the islands with them. They acquired these assets because back in their homeland their cacs allowed them to somewhat own land and sell the goods that grew on them during slavery. So when they got here they used their history of dealing with cacs to persuade some into selling to them. For the ones without money they were able to get around whites and were primarily helped and sold to by the West Indians with money.



bumboclat

This is a lie too. What are you dudes getting out of lying like this?

 

[HimmyHendrix]

This is a lie too. What are you dudes getting out of lying like this?

It’s literally in the study. Like what are you getting out lying about something that is literally published? like we can’t just change the text. it’s all there

 

[HimmyHendrix]

I didn't see anywhere it saying they sold to black Americans? However there are multiple instances of the paper citing that they lended and sold to exclusively West Indians.

this nikka acting like it’s a wikipedia page and not a study done by a penn state scholar

nobodies editing anything
changing words

it’s all there clear as day.

 

[Devilinurear]

I knew op was on some shyt when he was scared of thr 1 train

 

[Barlow]

This is a lie too. What are you dudes getting out of lying like this?

you haven't cited anything from the study. everything I said is in the quotes above in that post. you just saying shyt because you can't refute it

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

It’s literally in the study. Like what are you getting out lying about something that is literally published? like we can’t just change the text. it’s all there

It's literally not in the paper. You are intentionally distorting what it is saying. And nothing in it supports the claim you make in the thread title. It's not even supported in the abstract. Again, why are you lying like this?

 

[HimmyHendrix]

It's literally not in the paper. You are intentionally distorting what it is saying. And nothing in it supports the claim you make in the thread title. Again, why are you lying like this?

my cliffs

Cliffs: Cash-Rich West Indians use sponsors from home, migrant loans, and “covering” (white passing in ethnic form) to overpay white property owners for real estate in NYC then denied housing opportunities to people who weren’t from their ethnic groups for most of the 20th century.​

what part of this is not in the study?

l