Phil Jackson: Spurs aren't a dynasty until they win back to back titles

[Street Knowledge]

"I wouldn't call San Antonio a dynasty -- a force, a great force,"Jackson said, according to Newsday. "They haven't been able to win consecutive championships but they've always been there."

 

[Street Knowledge]

Phil Jackson: Spurs aren't a dynasty until they win back-to-back titles | FOX Sports on MSN

 

[#StarkSet]

i miss phil

 

[J-MIL]

 

[Rich Spirit]

 

[ExodusNirvana]

Zen Master

 

[holidayinn21]

he's right.

 

[dem bath salts]

I don't agree with that, what if they won ten titles every odd year, you telling me that aint a dynasty?
Back to back does look good on your resume tho

 

[Consigliere]

None of Pops rings have asterisks on them tho.

 

[obarth]

None of Pops rings have asterisks on them tho.

Lockout year

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

Winning 3 titles in a row makes it a dynasty, this espn bullshyt gotta nikkaz thinkin anything can be a dynasty just cuz the name sounds cool.

 

[IGSaint12]

You got idiot spurs fans thinking they are a dynasty just because they have sporadic titles in a 10 year span.

 

[OH SOHH TRILL]

I don't agree with that, what if they won ten titles every odd year, you telling me that aint a dynasty?
Back to back does look good on your resume tho

But they didn't.

 

[RugbyCardigan]

Lockout year

 

[Lefty Gunz]

Got a point