proof we're in an alternate reality?
- Thread starter NotAnFBIagent
- Start date
Cause God said so....
I don't know ...I mean I understand the whole "time don't exist" thing from a scientific approach. If I was to take a shot in the dark I'd say, because time is only real to us mentally.. You should google it
In each theory regarding parallel universes you either have quantum objects existing simultaneously in multiple universes or being present in different ones. Relatively you can only perceive the objects in your universe. This is what physicists are breaking down. Will be interesting what future gens can do with such knowledge in the future.
We have consistent measurable scales that we can perceive relatively vs other dimensions. Even with that, we are still only good at perceiving relative time. Just being an average human on earth we aren't good at perceiving distance vs time when we are looking at something as random as a star.
quantum physics is just always interesting to me. I don't understand most of it, but I know a dude that pretty much lives for it. Just making hardly nothing at his University, but is totally happy to sit at his white board and come up with computer programs to help him make calculations. We used to play counterstrike back in the day and he would stop and get ideas. Crazy stuff.
I can't believe that it took 8 pages for someone to give the right explanation.
I was going to say this but read through the whole thread first and found that at least someone had already said it.
When you were a kid and you heard, "stain", you had never heard someone named "stain" or anything like that before. But everyone knew about "EinSTEIN", or "FrankenSTEIN", or other "stein" names, so when you heard or read the unfamiliar "stain" your brain just treated it like "stein", and you repeated it to yourself that way later. So that's how you remember it.
The fact that people occasionally misspelled it, even when they were making the books, were a symptom of the same problem and helped to perpetuate it.
It's like when White Colonialists went to foreign countries and renamed all their cities the way they thought they heard them. So all the cities got fukked up White-distorted names, like "Mumbai" sounded like "Bombay" to the British, because that was closer to what they were used to. That happened all over the world. Same thing here - you heard/saw what you were used to rather than what was actually there.
Yes - dejavu comes from a memory allocation issue. You have short-term memory and long-term memory. When you hold something in your head for around 15 seconds, it goes into long-term memory. But on occasion, your brain has a glitch and it puts something into long term memory immediately. Your short-term memory is meanwhile placing the scene into long-term memory over the next 15 seconds, but then it sees that the scene is already there, and you get confused..."wait, isn't this scene already in my memory...maybe it happened before?" It's not that the scene happened before, it's that a brain shortcut put it into your long-term memory before your short-term memory got around to doing the same thing.
Some people have this particular brain glitch more than others, just because all our brains are unique.
I was going to say this but read through the whole thread first and found that at least someone had already said it.
When you were a kid and you heard, "stain", you had never heard someone named "stain" or anything like that before. But everyone knew about "EinSTEIN", or "FrankenSTEIN", or other "stein" names, so when you heard or read the unfamiliar "stain" your brain just treated it like "stein", and you repeated it to yourself that way later. So that's how you remember it.
The fact that people occasionally misspelled it, even when they were making the books, were a symptom of the same problem and helped to perpetuate it.
It's like when White Colonialists went to foreign countries and renamed all their cities the way they thought they heard them. So all the cities got fukked up White-distorted names, like "Mumbai" sounded like "Bombay" to the British, because that was closer to what they were used to. That happened all over the world. Same thing here - you heard/saw what you were used to rather than what was actually there.
Yes - dejavu comes from a memory allocation issue. You have short-term memory and long-term memory. When you hold something in your head for around 15 seconds, it goes into long-term memory. But on occasion, your brain has a glitch and it puts something into long term memory immediately. Your short-term memory is meanwhile placing the scene into long-term memory over the next 15 seconds, but then it sees that the scene is already there, and you get confused..."wait, isn't this scene already in my memory...maybe it happened before?" It's not that the scene happened before, it's that a brain shortcut put it into your long-term memory before your short-term memory got around to doing the same thing.
Some people have this particular brain glitch more than others, just because all our brains are unique.
Last edited:
DontgetTired777
FINE$$E THE WORLD BREH'S
just re-watched dont be a menace because of this fukkery 
Its not just the Berenstein Bears, theres more like I remember the restaurant being spelled Chik Fil A, but its Chick FIl A, I remember If you build it, they will come, but now its If you build it, he will come, Mr Rogers was Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood, but now its Its a beautiful day in this neighborhood, Star Wars Ive always heard Luke, I am your father, now its NO, I am your father, theres a lot more.
The Dont Be a Menace on Netflix though i think just has extra scenes. I have the original on my hard drive, gonna check it out to make sure later, but Netflix has done that with some movies. Has extra scenes and stuff like White Chicks I noticed that too.
The Dont Be a Menace on Netflix though i think just has extra scenes. I have the original on my hard drive, gonna check it out to make sure later, but Netflix has done that with some movies. Has extra scenes and stuff like White Chicks I noticed that too.
Time out Brehs that chick fil a shyt just fukked me up.
It was definitely chik. And I go to google it and now it's chick
I need an explanation
This is like a case of reverse Deja Vu or some shyt. I'm really mindblown right now.
I could have swore Forest said "Life IS like a box of chocolates" not "Life WAS..." in the movie
I could have swore it was called Febreeze not Febreze
I could have swore Darth Vader said "Luke, I am your father." not "NO, I am your father."
I could swore it was called Oscar Meyer, not Oscar Mayar
Could of swore it was called Different Strokes, not Diff'rent Strokes
Was it Looney Toons or Looney Tunes?????????
I could swore it was "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood." Not it's a beautiful day in this neighborhood."
wtf is really going on
Maybe I'm just tripping
I could have swore Forest said "Life IS like a box of chocolates" not "Life WAS..." in the movie
I could have swore it was called Febreeze not Febreze
I could have swore Darth Vader said "Luke, I am your father." not "NO, I am your father."
I could swore it was called Oscar Meyer, not Oscar Mayar
Could of swore it was called Different Strokes, not Diff'rent Strokes
Was it Looney Toons or Looney Tunes?????????
I could swore it was "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood." Not it's a beautiful day in this neighborhood."
wtf is really going on
Maybe I'm just tripping
Last edited:
I believe that we may be in a simulation, and/or exist in alternate universes, etc. etc.
...but Berenstain Bears is not really proof at all.
bruh