props to asian sprinters - they still tryin
- Thread starter FabTrey
- Start date
in here. This looks like a good place to sit.
David_TheMan
Banned
You are discrediting their effort and claiming its genetic superiority when the link I've given you has shown that there is no scientific evidence to support what you are claiming.
You are using the same logic of white racists, you've integrated racist non-sense and its a damn shame
Theres a reason all explosive sports are dominated by black people. If you think im discrediting athletes hard work you are a fool. Hardwork is required to cultivate talent. The black man has been proven as the superior athlete.
David_TheMan
Banned
Environment and socialization are the reason, plus self removal by certain races, like white american men, who use their own prejudice to exclude or discourage themselves and their kids.
You are discrediting the black athletes, whether you accept it or not.
Athletecism isn't a black feat, its a individual feat, again you aren't speaking scientifically at all.
Try to read that paper I sent you.
I ain't believing that Asian people really more athletic than White people like that.
Uh... why not?
It's a beautiful sight to see. Ain't it @J. Chizzle @CurrencyChasei clicked on this thread thinking it was a thread to slander the hella yella fellas; came in to cac slandering instead.
White women are still competitive in sprinting.
The thing is if it were mostly about genetics Nigeria should be the world power in sprinting, just by numbers alone they should be producing 5-8 world class sprinters.
It has to be about training if Nigeria isn't the world class standard in that sport.
Fukkin dumbass. Let me guess you also think cacs and asians are intellectually superior to black and brown people because they get higher test scores.
First of all, last I checked, East and West Africans were both black. So if one is good at one thing and the other is good at another, then it must be more cultural and enviroment based than it is genetics. East Africans are typically skinny and have long limbs because of their diet, the environment they live in, and a culture which has been nomadic for a long time. All these factors plus lots of hard work and people self-segregating themselves into certain fields contributes to the artificial conception that one group is better than another at a certain sport based on genetics.
Stop falling for cac mythologies. They do this shyt primarily so they can try and push an agenda of intellectual superiority on their part. There is no difference between "races". All humans are on average the same. There are few exceptional people in each community. The reason some groups end up better than others (like East Africans in long distance running) is self-selection more than anything. long distance running is much more a part of East African culture than it is in other regions.
You guys are either undercover cacs pretending to be black or utter and complete morons brainwashed by white supremacists.There are no genetic differences between human groups based on RACE (now before you act crazy focus on that word....RACE). First and foremost, race is a human construct. That basically means that race is something we as humans have created. There is really no scientific justification for it. There is no way to actually genetically seperate people into different races. Why? Because race is based on phenotypes (i.e. black people are categorized as people with dark brown skin and kinky/curly hair) and we know that just because 2 people look the same in terms of phenotype that doesn't mean they have the same genes. Africans are well known to be the most genetically diverse people on earth even though they share similar phenotypes. Similarly, if you go to Papau New Guinea, you'll see people who look indistinguishable from Africans (when it comes to phenotype) but when you look at their genetics, you'll see they are most closely related to East Asians.
Second, as you pointed out, we as humans have variations based on phenotype. But your mistake is thinking those phenotype differences are tied to genetic differences. For example, Kenyans and Jamaicans are both considered "black". Yet you will admit that Kenyans are good at long-distance running while Jamaicans are good at sprinting. If the genes that control of skin color and hair texture made both of them black, then why are they so different in terms of the sports they dominate? Maybe its because there are more factors involved like the environment? All the best Kenyans are actually from just one tribe. A tribe that lives in high elevation. This tribe is called the Kalejin and almost all of the great distance runners come from there. Why do you think that is? Did this one tribe just get different genes than the rest of the Kenyans? Or maybe its because its part of the Kalejin culture to run long distances. Maybe its the fact they live in such high elevation so they grow up learning to be more efficient when it comes to oxygen intake. Maybe their diet also effects their ability to be able to run long distance.
There are literally millions of other reasons to explain why certain groups are good at certain sports. Race is the LEAST LIKELY explanation. Stop listening to racist cacs who have also spend the last hundred years trying to convince us that black people are intellectually inferior to other races. I don't have a lot of patience for these racist theories.
Last edited:
What does environment and socialization have to do with the olympics? White countries send their finest athletes and they stand no chance what so ever. Same with every other nationally, at the elite level it has been proven that the black man is the superior athlete.
Matter fact black athletes dont only best other races in the highest level of competition they completely dominate them. You telling me the other races arent sending their best athletes? On average there is little difference in humans but we are talking about elite athletes.
You dont need a study to see these things.