"Race" = Bullshyt, According to Science

jerzboy

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
7,502
Reputation
1,293
Daps
24,478
Reppin
NULL
mulatto babble.

This is no different than the idiot college chicks that say "gender" is a social construct of the white supremacist patriarchal system.

Regardless if "race" is real - men will always divide themselves based on location, tribal affiliation, or religious beliefs.

Before race, we divided ourselves based on culture & religion.

technically, you can say culture and religion is not real either.

also, how does this ideology of "race is fake" help black people achieve power in the world? How is this useful?

minus the mulatto part, this is accurate. I’ve always said race is bs initiated by Europeans, but the world doesn’t view it as such. While I think the whole concept of race is bs, I identify as black and know the challenges we always face. Until we see a direct change, I’m rocking till I die with my folks
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
15,563
Reputation
2,844
Daps
43,185
Reppin
Duval Florida
Race being a social construct doesn't mean it doesn't have social implications. The fact that race is a social construct doesn't change anything about the negative impact of racism or the need to address racism in America, it just further proves how idiotic the arguments of the racists are. A social construct that has existed for 500+ years is still a real thing socially and can still be the basis of affirmative action, reparations, etc., it's just not a real thing biologically.








Subspecies are real and based on measurable genetic and phenotypic differences between populations.

Race is not real because there's no actual genetic differences that align best with race. If you want a scientific article on the subject, this is the best one I've seen. Genetically if we were to divide humans into genetic ancestry, then the most mathematically supported model would be 21 separate groups (though the differences are so vague there isn't that much difference in the modeling if you use as few as 12 groups or as many as 40) and over 97% of humans are mixed between two or more of those 21 groups. Plus none of the 21 groups would be different enough from each other to rise to the level of subspecies.

Human ancestry correlates with language and reveals that race is not an objective genomic classifier | Scientific Reports

41598_2017_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg



Each of the colors represents a different genetic lineage. Notice how each of the different geographic areas are made up of people of completely different genetic backgrounds, and even individual groups are made up of different colors themselves meaning they have mixed genetic background, plus some of the genetic backgrounds are shared across different continents. There's no way to look at that chart and decide that 4-5 races is the most sensible way to divide people.





41598_2017_1837_Fig2_HTML.jpg


That's another way of showing the data. Notice that there is less genetic difference between the east african and west asian lineages than there is between east african and south african. Notice that native americans are closer genetically to many asian groups than some of those asian groups are to each other. Notice that southern european and northern african lineages are closer to each other than southern europeans are to northern europeans. Notice that the south indian and south asian (north indian) lineages are so different from each other that they're in two entire different sections.

Don't forget that those genetic groupings don't even represent actual human populations today either. For example, the average person in Iran today is some mix of the south asian, west asian, north asian, and arabian ancestries, with every person in Iran being a different mix. Whereas someone from Libya is a different mix of arabian, west asian, north african, southern european, east african, and other ancestries.

There's no way to look at that data and decide that our modern racial categories make biological/genetic sense.


Appreciate the link, I'm going delve into it. The little I've parsed thus far is eye opening. It goes into what the elites know, that it's about bloodline.
 

Edub

Veteran
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
32,578
Reputation
2,546
Daps
73,318
Not necessarily, it's a prerequisite though.

To be racist you have to believe that there is a hierarchy between some of those races (ie that there are superior and inferior races).
Right…. So basically still we create the conditions for the ailment to exist…. What would happen if we all stopped id’ bout race on apps, id’s etc.,….. wonder what that shake up would cause :jbhmm:
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,120
Reputation
7,989
Daps
93,741
Right…. So basically still we create the conditions for the ailment to exist…. What would happen if we all stopped id’ bout race on apps, id’s etc.,….. wonder what that shake up would cause :jbhmm:
It would disarm people discriminated against based on race by making them unable to articulate why and how they are being discriminated against.

See countries such as France where race is not institutionally recognized, but racism is still alive and well.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,368
Reputation
-2,259
Daps
17,406
This is so dumb :mindblown: If you’re African American than you most likely have European dna which gives you Neanderthal dna as well.

It’s cac propaganda to say that they injected themselves into the DNA of millions and millions of African Americans that were here PRIOR to cacs arriving. Some? Sure. Most or all? Doubt it...

Im sorry you bought into it tho :francis:

Afro-Americans are a mixed group of people we are genetically different than a lot of other groups yet we’re all grouped with a racial category which isn’t based in anything real.

Ok cool, fine, whatever... My point was that cacs themselves say they have ape in their blood but nikkas don’t. But now we’re supposed to buy that “we’re all the same”?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,165
Daps
122,340
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
old boy said:
dennis schroder of the lakers (formerly? :lupe:) is black but his ethnicity is german

German is his Nationality, his ethnicity is Black.​

old boy said:
rapper wale is black but his ethnicity is african nigerian

Black is his ethnicity (AFAIK....Nigerians have their own ethnic groups). African applies to his continent of origin, Nigerian is his Nationality.​

old boy said:
old boy is black but his ethnicity is caribbean st. lucian

Wrong for the same reasons as your first and second example. Your ethnicity is Black, same as mine.

Hopefully this clears-up the confusion you have and there'll be no need to keep asking this question.​
 
Last edited:

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,333
Daps
82,557
This is true and has always been true. Race is not a biological concept. Race is not real. It only exists socially. It has no basis in reality other than being fiction we were all indoctrinated to believe.

Anyone who disagrees with me is a racist. We’re taking about science here. Not beliefs.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
:mjlol::mjlol::mjlol: Ados milic00ns rejecting actual peer reviewed science as invented by the white men in order to defend white supremacist pseudo science from the 19th century. You really can't make this shyt up:mjlol:


This is every militant race debate on TLR, ever. One of the guys responding here posted crude racist pictures made by some 16th-century European who didn't even travel to the places in question as evidence of what race those people were, as opposed to giving two shyts about the people's own stated history, genetic lineage, or fossil and archeological evidence. You'll see the same sort of shyt to varying levels on every topic - they eat up the most ignorant, racist, uninformed right-wing drivel as their information source, then just put a black militant spin on it.
 

africngiant

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,631
Reputation
926
Daps
11,558


cap:yeshrug:

eugenics or not we clearly have physical adaptations from a racial and geographical standpoint that span from many generations
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
53,609
Reputation
20,250
Daps
293,428

Everyone should watch that if you got HBO Max. Great documentary that goes over this idea, which is that our modern concept of race was created during the colonization period. You look at history going back thousands of years and don't see any real discussion of race. Wars were largely fought over cultural differences, mainly religion. During the Crusades the issue wasn't whites or Jews vs brown Arabs. It was Christendom vs Muslims.

When Greeks and Romans first came to Egypt they didn't say wow these black/brown/etc savages are smart. They immediately recognized them as fellow men and learned from them.
 
Top