Rare black female...

[Orbital-Fetus]

Her assistant is bad as shyt

bald/10...would smash and buy her a wig.

 

[MooseMouthMthafuga]

has nothing to do with dominance. each gender has unofficial gender roles. if you are laying in bed with your husband and a robber kicks in the door, are you gonna get up, get the gun, and take care of business while your husband cowers under the covers? HELL no. you would EXPECT his ass to get up and get busy. and if he didn't, . you would EXPECT a dude to get out and change the tire on the car if you are in the car together, whether it's his car or yours. it's unofficial gender roles. we embrace them. and it's not that we want to control you, we just want you to stop fighting it and embrace your nurturing instinct. it's naturally in you to be caring and want to take care of others, but you fight it so you can be more like men. we are born to be protectors, providers, hunters, and leaders. you are born to bear children, be nurturing, and care for and help others. not saying that those roles can't apply to the opposite sex, but let's be real, you are wired by instinct and DNA to just automatically do certain things based on gender. whether or not you choose to accept it is your problem. but don't expect for a REAL man to be cool with it and wife you anyway. you will have to be happy with a punk ass man following your every word or a nikka that will beat you into submission. it would be easier if everyone just played their position. fukk equality....

 

[Cat piss martini]

where the fukk is the chicken and dishes
she prepared in the damn video?
she's attractive but she's just running her damn
mouth about herself.

 

[Will Ross]

never trust a woman that tells you how good she will treat you?

 

[iBrowse]

I don't totally agree with you but I don't disagree with you either. Like I said in another thread, being submissive is not the same as being subservient. And just because a woman is submissive doesn't mean she's being bossed around. I'm all for women being submissive though.

 

[Uncle Kingpin]

fukk that lying ass bytch, she should be doing chores not making youtube videos to make women feel inferior.

 

[ExpensiveThrillz]

Right! These bruhs want a woman who "knows her place" so they can feel better about themselves and not have to challenge themselves in any way. They want a female to be on some June Clever type ish. My thing is, If I'm just as busy as dude is, why am I the only person expected to cook and clean and do all of this "domestic" ish? I am not interested in a union of those sorts.

I assume you're a young lady....but "knowing your place" has nothing to do with knowing your worth. Step into your goddess knowledge and embrace that you (we) are in no way equal to the opposite sex....and understand that's a beautiful thing

June Cleaver is one facet of the "ideal" woman that we should all strive to embody....shying away from or denouncing domestic duties and leadership only weakens you...and your ability to maintain a harmonious house state...its not about the man you live with/date/marry/have children with...even though they benefit....but being able to wear your domestic hat should be just as satisfying and rewarding as your woman warrior hat...or your career ass kicker hat...

it's ok to be strong in mind strong in opinion strong in character but also maintain the softness that only a woman can (and should) exude ....I am the heart center of my home...not because I feel obligated or subjugated...but because it is a sense of pride and joy in my life to be so...I feel like the duties I undertake temper me to be a better wife and mother for my efforts...and I also know I will lead by example to show my future sons how he should view a "good" woman and show my future daughters how to be one

basically i'm saying that you're responses are clear indicators that your just bucking to not feel like you're under a heel or thumb....which is understandable but any man worthwhile will be 100% alright with you being his sidekick, partner, friend, challenger (in the sense of pushing him and/or your children towards accomplishments/goals), and "equal" in the sense of not imposing some inferiority complex on you anyway...you shouldn't have to demand these things ....don't move away from embodying all that makes you woman just to escape the severely flawed logic and set of "rules" most of these silly young men have towards women....remember they're probably lacking the mothers who showed them what they should seek so they try to compensate by reading what other brehs say on message boards

 

[mcdivit85]

Both sexes have their vain conquest.

For men, it's the physical beauty of females.Some dudes can't get pass a cute face and a phat ass.Men, from 50 Cent, to Tiger Woods, want the physically banging female.No matter if's he's corporate, d boy'in, swagged out, or geeked out.That's how you know the values are skewed more on the female side of the equation.Why can't the corporate brother who busted his ass to get where he is and be successful not have access to a Briana Bette or a Maliah? He's a quality product.Well dressed//well spoken//groomed/self made/healthy etc...Why would Briana Bette or Maliah shun a brotha like that? Because Maliah/Briana's value system has them mentally warped in the brain.They'd rather be a celebrity/ d boy side piece. At the same time,I wouldn't make ANY man feel guilty for being attracted to chicks like that.Based on a man's nature, it's only natural.There's nothing wrong with it.The most puzzling thing is why females like that don't see the quality brotha as a good catch?I ask that rhetorically because I already understand why, but why?Females ultimately are the chooser/rewarder.

It seems like every time we talk about this subject(not you, just in general), some people make the mistake of trying to "blur the lines" by equating a man's nature to a females nature.Men are perpetually thirsty!In any natural/straight man, the hunger for sex is damn near just as powerful as the hunger for food.It's something that we're born having to master/conquer.Men are constantly seeking sex/female attention.That's why it's wise to get a wife.It was natures way of giving females the power of persuasion.The problem comes when a man is all sex drive, but lacking cultivation in the more important areas of life.That being said, a man is acting in accordance with his nature if he is led to a woman through his sex drive.Will it keep him there? that's another story.That post nut clarity is a real eye opener.


Vain conquest for females is easy.It's attention seeking & deception(fake hair..eyes..ass..lips...breast..everything etc)/using sex as a weapon/ being attracted to throw away qualities.Having a list of requirements like

Swag
dress nice
"mysterious"
other bytches want him
good father

4 out of 5 of those are throw away "qualities"



The market is shrinking and collapsing in on itself.The masses are asses.The world got us crazy.I'm not saying it's everybody, but I'm starting to think the "path of vain conquest" is the path most traveled.The majority is treading down that muafukka, grass worn out.

Again, great points. You're right, maybe a chick like Maliah "should" want a suit and tie, 9-5 brotha, but she probably doesn't. And its not just because of the way he looks or the fact that she thinks he's a lame even. Like I said, its due to values and what each side wants.

The corporate brotha doesn't live her lifestyle nor even wants to live her lifestyle. He doesn't want a woman who's always in the streets, at the club, taking booty pics and dressing skank. That would be a headache and would bring more drama to his life, which is work and he already works enough. He may like her look, but he wants a completely different mentality. And that's what I'm talking about...not the body but the brain.

Maliah is a chick who makes her money by being in the public eye...especially with very little clothing on and twerking her butt cheeks. She'a damn stripper/video chick/IG model by trade, so her life is about being an attention whore. Chicks like her don't want to go to corporate Chrismas parties, grocery shopping, attending PTA meetings and be at home baking cookies. They want to be in the streets, hosting parties at clubs, taking a## pictures and hanging out with rappers.

Now, when you take that look at it, do these two match? Ok, he finds her just as attractive as the d-boy, rapper that she usually dates. But whose lifestyle and mentality does she better match with? Barack Obama or Rick Ross? We both know the answer, and no matter how much she should want the 9-5 guy or how much the 9-5 does want her, it matters not.

As far as being thirsty, I'm not talking about a man wanting female companionship and wanting sex because women want the same things from men. What I'm talking about is letting a what a woman has between her legs control a man's moves and his thinking. A man who cannot control his desires is bound to be either a trick, cupcake or both. And nothing good comes from that.

Peace

 

[ExpensiveThrillz]

Not falling for it. I can smell the attitude through the screen. She don't have the charm of a true domestic broad.

glad I wasn't the only feeling this way...that long ass pause in the start of the video had stank all over it...like she just sucks lemons for kicks

 

[ExpensiveThrillz]

Again, great points. You're right, maybe a chick like Maliah "should" want a suit and tie, 9-5 brotha, but she probably doesn't. And its not just because of the way he looks or the fact that she thinks he's a lame even. Like I said, its due to values and what each side wants.

The corporate brotha doesn't live her lifestyle nor even wants to live her lifestyle. He doesn't want a woman who's always in the streets, at the club, taking booty pics and dressing skank. That would be a headache and would bring more drama to his life, which is work and he already works enough. He may like her look, but he wants a completely different mentality. And that's what I'm talking about...not the body but the brain.

Maliah is a chick who makes her money by being in the public eye...especially with very little clothing on and twerking her butt cheeks. She'a damn stripper/video chick/IG model by trade, so her life is about being an attention whore. Chicks like her don't want to go to corporate Chrismas parties, grocery shopping, attending PTA meetings and be at home baking cookies. They want to be in the streets, hosting parties at clubs, taking a## pictures and hanging out with rappers.

Now, when you take that look at it, do these two match? Ok, he finds her just as attractive as the d-boy, rapper that she usually dates. But whose lifestyle and mentality does she better match with? Barack Obama or Rick Ross? We both know the answer, and no matter how much she should want the 9-5 guy or how much the 9-5 does want her, it matters not.

As far as being thirsty, I'm not talking about a man wanting female companionship and wanting sex because women want the same things from men. What I'm talking about is letting a what a woman has between her legs control a man's moves and his thinking. A man who cannot control his desires is bound to be either a trick, cupcake or both. And nothing good comes from that.

Peace

I dig the point you're trying to make and even half ass agree however I find flaw in the logic only because most seemed concerned about the packaging and what the packaging says versus the actual contents

just because a man works in the corporate world and manages to be successful doesn't mean he's not immature or not seeking to live "the lifestyle" that a stripper would....and not particularly strippers....but women who make their living off of their image...say a super model or a famous tv personality, doesn't mean she is incapable of handling or even wanting "normal" woman/wife duties

the thing being left out of the equation is basic chemistry....personal wants and goals....in my opinion the ballers and strippers hook up because of the glitz and glam that come with bmf and living big for the moment and for the pictures.......sir corporate can easily be tossed into that same mentality...he just went to school and did his money acquisition hustle with his time and brain versus some innate talent like sports or rapping ...that doesn't mean he wants a nice little wife in nice little suburbia to go to Christmas parties with...

 

[Gallo]

The shyt really ain't as rare as you think it is.

The main problem is most women you meet don't treat you a certain way cause you're just an average nikka who deserves average treatment

 

[mcdivit85]

I dig the point you're trying to make and even half ass agree however I find flaw in the logic only because most seemed concerned about the packaging and what the packaging says versus the actual contents

just because a man works in the corporate world and manages to be successful doesn't mean he's not immature or not seeking to live "the lifestyle" that a stripper would....and not particularly strippers....but women who make their living off of their image...say a super model or a famous tv personality, doesn't mean she is incapable of handling or even wanting "normal" woman/wife duties

the thing being left out of the equation is basic chemistry....personal wants and goals....in my opinion the ballers and strippers hook up because of the glitz and glam that come with bmf and living big for the moment and for the pictures.......sir corporate can easily be tossed into that same mentality...he just went to school and did his money acquisition hustle with his time and brain versus some innate talent like sports or rapping ...that doesn't mean he wants a nice little wife in nice little suburbia to go to Christmas parties with...

Fair enough, but I feel like you're taking an exception and making it a rule just for the sake of argument. If we were to compare the number of corporate dudes who want the traditional wife, children and home life versus the number of rappers/d-boys who want the traditional wife, children and home life, whose numbers would be higher? We both know the answer to that.

I'm not saying that there are not outliers-corporate brehs who wants to live like Rick Ross or d-boys who want the "Leave it to Beaver" life. But accounting for outliers would take too long and require too much typing for a general point.

Your chemistry point is basically the same thing I'm saying throughout the post in terms of values and what each person wants for their life. So, I don't see how that was left out.

Peace

 

[ExpensiveThrillz]

Fair enough, but I feel like you're taking an exception and making it a rule just for the sake of argument. If we were to compare the number of corporate dudes who want the traditional wife, children and home life versus the number of rappers/d-boys who want the traditional wife, children and home life, whose numbers would be higher? We both know the answer to that.

I'm not saying that there are not outliers-corporate brehs who wants to live like Rick Ross or d-boys who want the "Leave it to Beaver" life. But accounting for outliers would take too long and require too much typing for a general point.

Your chemistry point is basically the same thing I'm saying throughout the post in terms of values and what each person wants for their life. So, I don't see how that was left out.

Peace

not really trying to add argument fuel here for the sake of anything other than e-convo....just throwing my 2 cents in and hopefully adding perspective is all

and "we" both don't know the answer to your hypothetical question because it's based in your opinion and not any type of fact in my humble opinion....there are plenty of single corporate professionals and there are plenty of married (or long term committed) non-professionals or "ballers, d-boys"

how are you so sure about these things is my question? just comes off like you're basing your assumptions off of what you perceive the lifestyles to be versus consideration same values/chemistry we've both spoken about that differs from person to person and relationship to relationship that ....also note that I didn't accuse you of leaving things particularly out but was speaking in general about the tone of this thread and the responses in it

 

[mcdivit85]

not really trying to add argument fuel here for the sake of anything other than e-convo....just throwing my 2 cents in and hopefully adding perspective is all

and "we" both don't know the answer to your hypothetical question because it's based in your opinion and not any type of fact in my humble opinion....there are plenty of single corporate professionals and there are plenty of married (or long term committed) non-professionals or "ballers, d-boys"

how are you so sure about these things is my question? just comes off like you're basing your assumptions off of what you perceive the lifestyles to be versus consideration same values/chemistry we've both spoken about that differs from person to person and relationship to relationship that ....also note that I didn't accuse you of leaving things particularly out but was speaking in general about the tone of this thread and the responses in it

I'm sure because I'm from the hood where I grew up around d-boys and street dudes, but I'm a college graduate who works around professionals who are mostly married. I've seen both worlds and the people who make them up for the most part. So, I'm not pulling what I say out of my a## or making "what if" statements. I'm speaking from the experience of living in the both worlds. So, using these experiences as a template gives me an understanding of what goes on more times than not.

I never stated that there were no single professionals or married d-boys. You're moving the argument....y no quiero jugar en esa manera. I said that generally, not in every circumstance ever in the world, but generally people who work in corporate positions live traditional lifestyles. And there's less of that amongst d-boy types.

Again, I'm not going to try to make arguments for outliers. In my experience, more professionals seek and live traditional lifestyles than people from the streets. Now, if you know a "hood" where there's an abundance of married couples with traditional, nuclear families headed by male breadwinners, then please direct me to this outlier. Also, if you know a Fortune 500 company that has an abundance of middle/senior level managers who have multiple baby mamas, then please direct me to this outlier. But even if you can find these outliers that doesn't disprove the overwhelming majority of examples that do not support said outliers.

You want me to acknowledge that there are exceptions to the rule. Ummm...yes, there are exceptions...now what? Does that change the rule? Does having something once out of 10 times means that it takes precedence over the other 9 times? No, it doesn't...its still the exception.

Peace

 

[Sandy_Cheeks]

I assume you're a young lady....but "knowing your place" has nothing to do with knowing your worth. Step into your goddess knowledge and embrace that you (we) are in no way equal to the opposite sex....and understand that's a beautiful thing

June Cleaver is one facet of the "ideal" woman that we should all strive to embody....shying away from or denouncing domestic duties and leadership only weakens you...and your ability to maintain a harmonious house state...its not about the man you live with/date/marry/have children with...even though they benefit....but being able to wear your domestic hat should be just as satisfying and rewarding as your woman warrior hat...or your career ass kicker hat...

it's ok to be strong in mind strong in opinion strong in character but also maintain the softness that only a woman can (and should) exude ....I am the heart center of my home...not because I feel obligated or subjugated...but because it is a sense of pride and joy in my life to be so...I feel like the duties I undertake temper me to be a better wife and mother for my efforts...and I also know I will lead by example to show my future sons how he should view a "good" woman and show my future daughters how to be one

basically i'm saying that you're responses are clear indicators that your just bucking to not feel like you're under a heel or thumb....which is understandable but any man worthwhile will be 100% alright with you being his sidekick, partner, friend, challenger (in the sense of pushing him and/or your children towards accomplishments/goals), and "equal" in the sense of not imposing some inferiority complex on you anyway...you shouldn't have to demand these things ....don't move away from embodying all that makes you woman just to escape the severely flawed logic and set of "rules" most of these silly young men have towards women....remember they're probably lacking the mothers who showed them what they should seek so they try to compensate by reading what other brehs say on message boards

I'm sorry but June Cleaver is not somone that I as a woman strives to embody. I understand what your trying to say here, but all women do not want the same things and thats ok. Just because I would rather read a book than wash a dish doesnt mean I am denouncing my womanly domestic duties. I am more than "duties or a set of rules to live by" as a woman. Maybe my vantage point is a little left field, and I'm ok with that.