Red pill Manosphere podcaster cac gets taken down HARD and exposed for not living what he preaches.

[kingofnyc]

You're an idiot. The attack wasn't actually on his wife.

nah nikka, you’re an idiot …. Explain to me how bringing his wife up and exposing her having three kids from three different men. It’s not an attack. I’ll fukking wait.

The cacs wife isn't "innocent". She comes on these shows to "debate" too, which is why that white boy called her on the phone.

oh ok … if she injects herself in these so-called debates then she is fair game
With that said there’s still no reason why the feminist lesbian bytch has a right to say she should’ve bought her three kids as flat out disgusting

 

[Kingofthereal]

Wheres da take down?

I saw a man not allowing sum1 to bad talk his wife. Where was the take down.

I saw a female who had to go str8 to the family shots instead of going back at him directly

What you saw was a nikka getting exposed for not practicing what he’s preaching.

 

[Uchiha God]

nah nikka, you’re an idiot …. Explain to me how bringing his wife up and exposing her having three kids from three different men. It’s not an attack. I’ll fukking wait.

His positions, messaging and supposed beliefs and values are incongruous with his own life. Point out this as a fact - isn’t an attack. It is salient to the conversation.

And it is not as though - at least in the clips posted - she said “your wife is less than because”, which is often the position of “trad values” grifters in relation to women with kids

 

[Supa]

at some of y’all comments in here, but I get it. It’s thecoli


and for the record, I’m not defending or siding or anything with this dude he comes off as a typical delusional dikkhead
but I can’t understand why none of y’all are giving the woman any smoke for being equally a delusional dikkhead

She supposed to be a lesbian feminist yet she attacks a innocent woman who has 3 kids from 3 different relationships, and basically says she should’ve had aborted all her children

How is she an innocent woman when she supports her husband's grifting?

He earns a living by degrading and insulting women like her while keeping her past hidden because it would expose his hypocrisy.

Pointing out that his wife has 3 baby daddies is not an insult to his wife. It's a fact and they wouldn't be ashamed of it if they weren't living a lie.

 

[#BOTHSIDES]

Any man who refers to vagina as "snizz" is getting pegged at home.

My first time hearing that word

 

[Diyhai]

was the same
talking all that about single mothers than wifed one
women are definitely smarter and colder hearted than men

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

nah nikka, you’re an idiot …. Explain to me how bringing his wife up and exposing her having three kids from three different men. It’s not an attack. I’ll fukking wait.











oh ok … if she injects herself in these so-called debates then she is fair game
With that said there’s still no reason why the feminist lesbian bytch has a right to say she should’ve bought her three kids as flat out disgusting

he had no respect for her to begin with

 

[mbewane]

Typical right-winger. Acts superior and condescendent, then starts yelling slurs when someone calls them out on their bullshyt because that's all they really got.

He calls himself a "great orator" too

 

[Umoja]

nah nikka, you’re an idiot …. Explain to me how bringing his wife up and exposing her having three kids from three different men. It’s not an attack. I’ll fukking wait.

That I am having to explain this to you is proof that you are in fact an idiot.

"Hypocrisy is the practice of pretending to have a set of beliefs, values, or principles that one does not actually possess, or of saying one thing while doing another."


"Children begin to understand hypocrisy as young as 4 to 6 years old, but this understanding becomes more sophisticated around age 7, when they start to see inconsistency between words and actions as a moral failing. Preschoolers can identify moral hypocrites and judge them more negatively than others who simply misbehave, while 7-year-olds use a person's stated moral beliefs to predict their future actions.
"
Do you understand where I am going with this? That Andrew dikk head promotes a lifestyle of ultra masculinity where men take what they want, and women know their place. He has argued that some women have enjoyed rape on the grounds having orgasmed throughout the ordeal. Within his world view, and the filth he champions, women who have children to multiple fathers are of diminished value, fit for cucks only.

Him being with a woman who has multiple kids to different dads is at odds with his rhetoric and the movement he's part of. It is perfectly acceptable for someone to point that out.

7 years olds understand the concept of hypocrisy so when you as a grown man struggles to come to terms with a blatant example of it, I'm going to see you as an idiot.

 

[kingofnyc]

His positions, messaging and supposed beliefs and values are incongruous with his own life. Point out this as a fact - isn’t an attack. It is salient to the conversation.

And it is not as though - at least in the clips posted - she said “your wife is less than because”, which is often the position of “trad values” grifters in relation to women with kids

How is she an innocent woman when she supports her husband's grifting?

He earns a living by degrading and insulting women like her while keeping her past hidden because it would expose his hypocrisy.

Pointing out that his wife has 3 baby daddies is not an insult to his wife. It's a fact and they wouldn't be ashamed of it if they weren't living a lie.

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well

The best analogy I can give you
Say there’s a debate between Cynthia G vs ‘insert sad typical Black Manosphere dude’
And the dude says to Cynthia well you flew from Seattle to the Carolinas passing three times zones to get with a dude to impregnate you who had five children from five different baby mothers … every individual will understand that is attack on Cynthia G and an attack on Rob the dude who impregnated her.


I hope I clarified my stance on this

 

[kingofnyc]

That I am having to explain this to you is proof that you are in fact an idiot.

"Hypocrisy is the practice of pretending to have a set of beliefs, values, or principles that one does not actually possess, or of saying one thing while doing another."


"Children begin to understand hypocrisy as young as 4 to 6 years old, but this understanding becomes more sophisticated around age 7, when they start to see inconsistency between words and actions as a moral failing. Preschoolers can identify moral hypocrites and judge them more negatively than others who simply misbehave, while 7-year-olds use a person's stated moral beliefs to predict their future actions.
"
Do you understand where I am going with this? That Andrew dikk head promotes a lifestyle of ultra masculinity where men take what they want, and women know their place. He has argued that some women have enjoyed rape on the grounds having orgasmed throughout the ordeal. Within his world view, and the filth he champions, women who have children to multiple fathers are of diminished value, fit for cucks only.

Him being with a woman who has multiple kids to different dads is at odds with his rhetoric and the movement he's part of. It is perfectly acceptable for someone to point that out.

7 years olds understand the concept of hypocrisy so when you as a grown man struggles to come to terms with a blatant example of it, I'm going to see you as an idiot.

read my previous post - and come back and tell me where the hell am I wrong

 

[Da_Eggman]

People actually defending this dude in here

 

[Umoja]

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well

The best analogy I can give you
Say there’s a debate between Cynthia G vs ‘insert sad typical Black Manosphere dude’
And the dude says to Cynthia well you flew from Seattle to the Carolinas passing three times zones to get with a dude to impregnate you who had five children from five different baby mothers … every individual will understand that is attack on Cynthia G and an attack on Rob the dude who impregnated her.


I hope I clarified my stance on this

You're a bozo. Everyone understands your point. The problem is that you're a fool who expects other people to be stifled by the fallacies you use as a shield.

Going by your logic, we would not be able to call people out on their double standards. This is the logic a lot of right wing lunatics try to enforce on the world; you can't point out my hypocrisy because my actions are something you support.

That is not how the world works. The woman actually made it clear that she did not disapprove of women having children from different fathers. What she did was apply his life to the standard he promotes. That is fair game.

You are riding his meat, quite shamefully at that.

 

[Kiyoshi-Dono]

You can’t talk about virtuosity while married to a woman with a rapsheet that’s public knowledge
This is why it’s a takedown
Yeah, yeah you call it defending your wife but your wife been ran through and discarded
And now you just the clean up man or the dad that stepped in
Now if his wife was “clean”
Wasn’t with any of the fukkery this cac is known for
Then yeah this would’ve been shaky on that cac bytch because she would be grasping for straws
But his reaction tells you how he really feels inside
Also this cac is a MAGA piss ant
And the other host is just as bad
Stop feeling sorry or defending these nonblack bytch nikkas
Trust they don’t give one red cent about your supposed black asses

 

[Supa]

Let me make this crystal clear before posters start getting it twisted … I am not defending this dude at all


My position is this woman who is a feminist bringing up his wife’s children and pass failed marriages /relationships is completely out of pocket.
Now, if he was debating another man who said the same exact thing as she did then that would be fair game.
The problem is a feminist supposed to support and protect her fellow females … so yes, her bringing up his wife’s failed previous relationships to attack him automatically makes it attack on his wife’s as well

The best analogy I can give you
Say there’s a debate between Cynthia G vs ‘insert sad typical Black Manosphere dude’
And the dude says to Cynthia well you flew from Seattle to the Carolinas passing three times zones to get with a dude to impregnate you who had five children from five different baby mothers … every individual will understand that is attack on Cynthia G and an attack on Rob the dude who impregnated her.


I hope I clarified my stance on this

"Your wife has 3 baby daddies."

That is a plain fact. Had he taken it as such there's no insult in it. It only becomes that when you add in his own hypocrisy and need to defend his lies. She's not shaming the woman as much as she is destroying his facade.

Again you can't separate the fact that his wife is supporting her husband's grifting. She's allowing him to degrade herself and other women for profit. Why would any feminist respect her? She's not worthy of protection.