miami will be wack as fukk without him, are they tarded?
Its really not all on Wallace, yeah he has a problem running back to the ball or fighting for it but Tanny deep ball flat out sucks. I seen Wallace wide open for several touchdowns and Tanny either overthrows or under throws him by 10 yards
a rookie took his #1 spot
nah get ya money while u canShould have stayed in Pittsburgh
Should have stayed in Pittsburgh
YUPnah get ya money while u can
You obviously haven't see the Dolphins play. The rookie Landry despite having had a slow start, had far better chemistry with Tannehill than Wallace ever did. Wallace is a deep threat but has improved a lot on shorter routes but stillmiami will be wack as fukk without him, are they tarded?
Thoughts?
Na breh I don't think so, we need to focus on Landry and keep slow ass Hartline BC he has the best chemistry with Tanny even if he injury prone.YUP
Get your money first. You're only young once. fukk a championship. Plenty of broke champions out there
You obviously haven't see the Dolphins play. The rookie Landry despite having had a slow start, had far better chemistry with Tannehill than Wallace ever did. Wallace is a deep threat but has improved a lot on shorter routes but still
1) We run a modified version of the wesCoast offense which is about timing and short quick passes
2) TanneHill, while great at the short passing game sucks balls when it comes to the deep ball. And Wallace's biggest strength is... as a deep threat
3) While i like Wallace a lot and hate our HC, his antics are bound to get him in trouble with the coaching staff so why keep him around if you already decided you're gonna keep the coach.
@Ain't That Something , I still think Richard Matthews if given the opportunity CAN challenge be our best receiver