You did not answer my question.
Do you know what the legal test for insanity is? To clarify, what hurdles must he overcome to use insanity as a defence for the crime committed.
I'm going to shine spotlight on your bytch ass. Have a problem with black TV shows depicting family life but in this thread copping pleas for a murdering piece of shyt who is going to end up causing more suffering to the son he tried to kill.
First off fakkit, calm the fukk down. Second of all, fukk your question I gave you an answer.
Third of all, a state psychologist would have to deem him insane which usually begins with the interviewing detective or their lawyer requesting a psych evaluation. That’s the protocol when it comes to CACS and it ends way worse for them as a result even though you’d first think that the death penalty is the harsher option.
And from my initial post I said this is a deeper ethics issue. Fukk this fakkit murderer, no one is caping for him. Again, as I said in my initial post if he was deemed insane his life imprisonment under the harshest drugs you could imagine would be way worse than him getting the easy way out by death penalty.
But again, as I said in my initial post some of you are too emotional to understand where I’m coming from.