You flippantly and casually dismiss the notion that Incognito is racist, reducing the importance of the occurrence of racial harassment to simply whether or not the perpetuater of it is "racist," a context in which "racist" is nothing more than semantics-based and in essence downplaying the signicance of it. Whether or not the action itself is racist is the important thing here, not if Incognito is racist, whatever the fukk that means. It's not a binary thing.
Then you said he isn't racist because there's no evidence that he thinks black people are inferior.

I guess you have to believe in 19th century phrenology to be a racist now. Then you said he isn't racist because he has a black friend (Pouncey).
Then after being asked twice, you finally admit you're not black...and added that you've experienced racism, as if that personal anecdote is relevant.
Man just stop talking.