rings and legacy aside who would you start a franchise with. jordan or lebron

Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
557
Reputation
-20
Daps
322
Reppin
NULL
thats a tough 1... but if we were considering it in that day and time id have to go with mj. he proved himself before even stepping into the nba. he went to college for 3 years, won a title, and played with n against the top competition in his age bracket,. lebron for the most part went to hs, played and dominated mostly weaker smaller slower not fully developed teens in his age bracket. it is a huge step from hs to college and an even greater step from hs to pro. so if i was the gm of the team id look into all that and pick mj all day
 

klientel

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,596
Reputation
2,028
Daps
79,561
Not sure what this thread is asking....

Knowing what I know now there is no way I would pick Bron over MJ, it's a easy decision.

If u mean I had to pick one based on their pre-draft prospects then it's LeBron easy. But I'm not sure what that would prove.
 

Reggie

Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
91,549
Reputation
4,993
Daps
193,307
Reppin
Virginia
I would pick MJ but couldn't fault anyone who took Bron first. And my reason is this. I know this sounds sacreligious but how do we know MJ would be the greatest in this era. Every team has at least one (some more) player with comparable athleticism and size as MJ. I don't think he would be shytting on a prime T-Mac even Vince like he did on Ehlo and whoever else back in the day. Who else at Shooting Guard in the 80's and 90's could honestly compete with MJ other than Clyde the Glide. Joe Dumars was a great player but lets not act like he was anymore than about 6'2 and wouldn't be anymore than a third guard now. Ehlo, who wouldn't even be a sixth man on the worst team today. I mean i know if Bron played in the 80's and 90's we know he would have got knocked on his ass. But he still would be 6'9 270 with the same athleticism. Whose to say after a few years of punking he wouldn't become a stone cold assasin just like Mike.
 

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,976
Reputation
13,975
Daps
199,341
Jordan has no flaws

There are defenses that make lebron look like a normal all star. That wouldn't work with Jordan
 

aixenv

Lakers World Order
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
690
Reputation
10
Daps
373
Reppin
Los Angeles
this has to be the stupidest thread ive seen in a while congrats

how can you discount the legacy and the rings moron?

Michael "Air" Jordan 100 times out of 100 times

Did MJ ever lay a goose egg in the finals? didn't think so

You are apparently too young to have lived through and appreciated His Airness

There is no comparison whatsoever

People said Magic was better than him and you know what he did in that finals? out averaged Magic in every statistical category

This is more than likely a shock thread, well consider me shocked so you accomplished your goal with this dumbass thread
 

aixenv

Lakers World Order
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
690
Reputation
10
Daps
373
Reppin
Los Angeles
I would pick MJ but couldn't fault anyone who took Bron first. And my reason is this. I know this sounds sacreligious but how do we know MJ would be the greatest in this era. Every team has at least one (some more) player with comparable athleticism and size as MJ. I don't think he would be shytting on a prime T-Mac even Vince like he did on Ehlo and whoever else back in the day. Who else at Shooting Guard in the 80's and 90's could honestly compete with MJ other than Clyde the Glide. Joe Dumars was a great player but lets not act like he was anymore than about 6'2 and wouldn't be anymore than a third guard now. Ehlo, who wouldn't even be a sixth man on the worst team today. I mean i know if Bron played in the 80's and 90's we know he would have got knocked on his ass. But he still would be 6'9 270 with the same athleticism. Whose to say after a few years of punking he wouldn't become a stone cold assasin just like Mike.

with all due respect, it's not MJs skills or God given talent, it's his thirst to be the best, his competitive drive and his desire to seak perfection that made him the best baller to ever put on a pair of sneakers

i seriously can't even believe you guys are entertaining this idea, it's totally an insult to MJ, the kobe vs MJ discussions are insults as well, Kobe was great (note i said was), but there is MJ, then everyone else, the 80s/90s had way better bball than today. players today are soft, only a few come to mind that would have been ok in that environment, kobe, KG, etc, but the most of them are soft flopping chumps that couldn't withstand the intensity of the game

go watch the bulls/knicks series and witness true basketball played by men
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,503
Reputation
530
Daps
7,584
Reppin
The Sweet Science
Id take MJ but the question isnt as blasphemous as some people are making it seem. You are talking about someone (in Lebron)with 3 MVPs a career avg of almost 30/7/7 shoots 50% and can defend 4 and sometimes all 5 positions on the floor.
 
Last edited:

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,171
Reputation
5,153
Daps
120,193
Reppin
ATL to MEM
Bulls without Mike made it deep into the playoffs, Cavs without LeBron went to the lottery.

Unfair and sort of an incomplete question.

We talkin bout a 27 yr. old Mike and a 27 yr. old Lebron?

Or

We talkin bout a 27 yr. old Lebron and an already retired and legacy built Mike?

The answer to this question determines everything.
 
Top