Robert Mugabe Blasts ‘Coward’ Nelson Mandela

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,753
Daps
35,658
Reppin
NULL
The cacs, including our own Bush administration, didn't like Mugabe taking his land back from their racist colonial kin so they imposed sanctions on small Zimbabwe. This helped crash Zimbabwe's economy, destroying Mugabe's creditability and further establishing the cac nation's. The end game is regime change and European takeover of the economy yet again.

As we speak, the 200k+ black Zimbabweans Mugabe gave farm land are updating their equipment, bettering their knowledge and increasing cash crop share. For all those interested in Zimbabwean's untold land reform success, please see Ian Sc00ne' 2010s academic Yale paper on the subject entitled: "Zimbabwe’s land reform: challenging the myths". Just Google it.

Alternatively, Mandela is indeed a coward. He capitulated to the cacs and they rewarded him with riches, fame and immunity. Meanwhile Mugabe took a different path, fighting the cacs who imprisoned and tortured him for decades, and taking back his land. Mugabe now stands as the symbol of the white man's ire, a more enviable position than at the cac's feet like Mandela. Even now the Mandela's party takes the coward's way out plans to take back South Africa land through "buying" it from the cac thieves. Coward.

Someone put me on to a good book on the colonization of South African and Mandela being a sell-out. :lupe:
Since the cacs control the media and see Mandela sparing their pale asses, he is a hero. But since Mugabe doesn't spare them and takes back his people's shyt, he is a villian. The cacs then use their vast economic and political resources to crush Zimbabwe and squeeze Mugabe's people until they kill him.
 
Last edited:

Box Cutta

Bumbling Sidekick
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,783
Reputation
2,274
Daps
39,499
Reppin
Sanitation Department
For some reason this does not bother the HL black posters.

This last part in bold is something that damn near every hl and the coli poster should research, understand and think about in terms of their own nation, and in the nations in Africa that we hold up as examples.

I mostly agree with this...........
but for some reason we are scared not only of militancy, but diss, blast, and ignore any black who is militant................................... Then when the inevitable crazy militant Black takes shyt over (a matter of time under the pressures of oppression) We call that person a sociopath. It's our own damn fault - look at Zimbabwe. We hype up ONLY the Mandela... not the ones who want to do what needs to be done for real freedom - maybe murk people off if u have to. Maybe push people out. Do things for the moral good and good of the masses --- NOT hype of the person who makes the deal that allows us to pretend to be free and trade luxuries for dignity.
That's the weak way out.... we did it in the 1600's... and we did it again in the 1960's. Honestly the fact that more of us cared that MLK was shot than cared that Fred Hampton was shot along with his family and friends in cold blood ---- makes us a pathetic laughing stock.

literal stock

Man...our race needs to go nuclear.

10 percent of the population controlling 80 percent of the land...that's disgusting. SA's should have sliced the necks of every fukking cac in sight.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
Lets be real with zimbabwe, theyre going to have to join the rest of the world if they want to prosper.
Man...our race needs to go nuclear.

10 percent of the population controlling 80 percent of the land...that's disgusting. SA's should have sliced the necks of every fukking cac in sight.

it's not that.
 
Last edited:

Northern Son

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
7,722
Reputation
1,155
Daps
21,068
Lets be real with zimbabwe is going to have to join the rest of the world if they want to prosper. And that means the


haven't we taken over? so why's it still fukked up?

A resounding no.

http://africanholocaust.net/articles/SOUTH AFRICA 10 DAYS.htm

As for your first sentence "joining the rest of the world" for Zimbabwe means giving those cacs everything. That's the only way the west will remove sanctions. It's very sad that the west punishes the Zimbabwean people for Mugabe's actions.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
A resounding no.

http://africanholocaust.net/articles/SOUTH AFRICA 10 DAYS.htm

As for your first sentence "joining the rest of the world" for Zimbabwe means giving those cacs everything. That's the only way the west will remove sanctions. It's very sad that the west punishes the Zimbabwean people for Mugabe's actions.

mugabe constantly walls himself off from the rest of the world and I mean that in a bad way.


edit: see what china has to offer. because if it isn't america it's going to be china. get used to the modern economy.
 

Northern Son

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
7,722
Reputation
1,155
Daps
21,068
Lets be real with zimbabwe is going to have to join the rest of the world if they want to prosper. And that means the


haven't we taken over? so why's it still fukked up?
mugabe constantly walls himself off from the rest of the world and I mean that in a bad way.


edit: see what china has to offer. because if it isn't america it's going to be china. get used to the modern economy.

Mugabe didn't wall himself, the west overwhelmed Zimbabwe with sanctions. Mugabe is a thieving, murdering piece of shyt but the west contributed a lot to Zimbabwe's failure.

Fucck China. The Chinese are among the worst things to happen to Zimbabwe/Africa.
 

Family Man

Banned
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
13,175
Reputation
1,980
Daps
54,984
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ing-but-its-future-lies-in-Chinese-hands.html
Robert Mugabe always told a great many lies on the election trail, but this year, his biggest boast is actually true. Zimbabwe’s economy is recovering and he is overseeing an extraordinary mini-boom. “Zimbabwe has not collapsed under the heavy weight of sanctions,” he boasted from the podium on Sunday – and he is quite correct. The few sanctions imposed by the West have not stopped what a World Bank economist recently called an “amazing” recovery. For those who like to believe that political freedom is the surest route to prosperity, it’s deeply depressing news. For the 89-year-old president, something has gone horribly right.

The election result is not due for days, but Mugabe’s Zanu-PF is declaring victory anyway. Never mind that the electoral roll contained a suspiciously high number of centenarians in a country where life expectancy is 51, and, by some estimates, two million dead voters. Mugabe deployed his old Marxist guerrilla skills: he rounded up his people, roped in the military to campaign for him and intimidated his opposition into staying at home. Neither he nor his rival, Morgan Tsvangirai, seem to doubt that this worked. Yet another Zimbabwean election has been rigged.

But it’s harder to rig the economy, and signs of recovery are everywhere. Hotels are becoming busier, drivers can fill their cars again and sales of lager are surging. The Zimbabwean economy grew more last year than the British one is expected to in the next three years. The press in Harare has taken to mocking Britain for being unable to control inflation – rich from a country where it is estimated to have peaked at 79.6 sextillion per cent. But since the US dollar and British pound were accepted as legal tender, economic stability has returned. On current trends, Zimbabwe’s economy is about five years away from a full gravity-defying recovery.

This has been mostly ignored in Britain, as it contradicts what we thought we knew about Mugabe: that he is a kleptocratic maniac who is destroying his country rather than reviving it. His misrule has been a textbook case of how dictators can ruin their nations. When Zimbabwe went independent in 1980, it had bright prospects: a thriving farming sector and high literacy rates. But after Mugabe started to purge the white farmers, the former breadbasket of Africa was taken to the brink of famine, with starvation used as a weapon against millions. Ten years ago, my colleague Peter Oborne published a pamphlet, urging that Britain intervene, with the title “A Moral Duty to Act There”.

And there was talk of acting, for a while. But very little came of it, and pitifully little has changed since. Tsvangirai was invited into a “unity partnership” with Mugabe, but there was neither unity nor partnership and things carried on as before.

Related Articles
By the normal laws of economics, Zimbabwe’s government ought to have collapsed – but the global spike in mineral prices has changed things. Suddenly, the diamond mines became more valuable than ever and Chinese investors turned up willing to do business with Mugabe without any of the qualms shown by the West. Instead of being lectured by the International Monetary Fund, he was being offered his gilded place in China’s fast-growing African empire.

Even now, officials in the Foreign Office talk about what to do with Africa as if the old colonial master still had substantial clout to wield. Tony Blair has admitted that he laboured under this delusion until he left office, only later realising that China had come from nowhere to be Africa’s biggest single client and most influential ally. That influence can come via Chinese government enterprises, or random, shadowy financiers such as Sam Pa, who was reported to have sent a cool $100 million to Mugabe’s Central Intelligence Organisation (his main tool of repression) in return for access to diamonds.

In Zimbabwe, the press is full of signs of China’s growing influence. There is talk of giant television screens being erected in Harare to transmit Chinese news. Mugabe has set up a Confucius Institute at Zimbabwe University and roofed his mansion with distinctive Chinese tiles. Two years ago a Chinese actress, Wendy Yang, was given a leading role in Zimbabwe’s longest-running soap opera, Studio 263. The yuan may become an official currency. It’s not that China’s money is single-handedly reviving Zimbabwe, but that its willingness to do business (and sell weapons) makes a mockery of attempted Western sanctions. Zimbabwe’s options are not simply Western-style freedom or penury. The Beijing model of “state capitalism” is available as well, and it pays.

A country that was previously unable to borrow can now offer its nickel, diamond and gold mines as collateral. A recent report from the Cato Institute estimates that Zimbabwe’s ability to borrow once again has allowed public spending to soar tenfold – leading to deficits so jaw-droppingly large that they almost approach British levels. Half of state spending goes to the chosen few who work for the government. The new wealth is shoring up a regime designed to outlive the elderly President.

This, at least, explains the Mugabe economic mystery. He’s getting rich thanks to a mixture of debt-fuelled spending, soaring mineral prices and deep-pocketed, studiously amoral Chinese buyers. It may be a fake kind of growth, and Zimbabwe is still far behind where it was before he started to tear his country apart. But there are signs that the improvement helps him politically. Even last year, opinion polls showed support for the opposition significantly weakening and Zanu-PF taking the lead. There is no doubt that Zimbabweans have yet again just seen a twisted, corrupt election. But even if it had been free and fair, that would have been no guarantee of a landslide victory for Morgan Tsvangirai.

There has always been a hope, in the UK, that Zimbabwe is just one election away from rebirth. It’s not so much of a foreign country: we share a history, a language, a religion and now a currency. Like almost all Britain’s colonies, it was granted independence with the institutions that ought to guarantee human dignity and freedom: a free press, limited government and an independent judiciary. If Zimbabwe flourished in 1980, there seems to be no reason why it could not do so again soon. After all, how long can an octogenarian tyrant last?

But the other old argument for change – that Zimbabwe’s prosperity can only come with the restoration of its old freedoms – has taken a knock in recent years. Mineral mining vies with oil trading as the worst form of capitalism, bringing money without the need for liberty. To grow rich on farming and manufacturing requires the rule of law, education, property rights and economic liberalisation. Any old tyrant can cut a deal with foreigners who want to drill for oil or diamonds. And when he dies, another can take his place.

There is nothing to suggest that China’s overall influence in Africa is malign: it has brought investment and jobs to places that desperately needed them. But it is hardly the world’s greatest advocate of democratic freedom. Mugabe’s recovery may well turn out to be a bubble that bursts when the loans stop, or the minerals run out. His regime may well collapse. But if it does, it may well be China rather than Britain that picks up the pieces.
Even this salty devilsh CAC had to grudgingly give Zimbabwe props.
 

Danie84

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
73,300
Reputation
13,840
Daps
134,204
I had to stop reading at "...the coward sat his ass in prison for 27 years" :rudy:
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,436
Daps
26,227
I had to stop reading at "...the coward sat his ass in prison for 27 years" :rudy:

he wasn't a coward when he went in there. His ex wife was down for the struggle too--- all those people were ready to sit in jail or die. We think we know what they went through but it was crazier than we think.

By the time Nelson got out- he was like :whew: fukk that struggle shyt.

He wasn't about that life any longer... the S.A kids -12-19 year olds looked up to the old image of him. They didn't know he would do what Winni mandela would call "a bad deal for blacks"

To me being a house slave is just as bad as being a field slave but worse - because you start to slowly feel accepted just because you're eating slightly better - then eventually you start to blame the field slaves for being too 'unrefined' or ' not presenting themselves better' or 'not being chosen' - then it becomes their fault for being in the field not the plantation owners fault. SA gets to live in the house and Zimbabwe gets to work the fields. Of course being detached it's easy for us to say it's because dude is crazy - not because of crazy economic sanctions that Z is fukked up. Metaphorically SA lives in the house and thinks it's ok that the master fukks his sister in the ass every once in a while because they get to pretend to sit at the table and eat the scraps that fall on the floor.

When in reality - a small few whites control the vast majority of the wealth in that nation and the report the Success of their society and economy to the world as a message to us in the diaspora and to field Negros like Zimbabweans that if you don't sell out you will starve. Lose all dignity or lose your position in the world. Basically, Nelson should have went on massacre mode - it's naieve to think that violence isn't necessary sometimes.
 

Northern Son

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
7,722
Reputation
1,155
Daps
21,068
What's Zimbabwe's relationship with China?

China is going to recolonize Zimbabwe and every African country they touch. There are talks of Zimbabwe adopting the Chinese yuan.

http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...-investment-with-hints-of-colonialism/240978/

Some info on our Chinese "friends":

China's growing investment and development in Sub-Saharan Africa, dubbed "The Next Empire" by The Atlantic's Howard French for its historic potential to reshape the continent and grow Chinese influence, is looking especially imperial these days in Zimbabwe. The impoverished pariah state, isolated by President Robert Mugabe's violent suppression of dissent, has put more and more of its economy and natural resources under Chinese control. The Asian giant, in return for its investments -- both in Zimbabwean infrastructure and in Mugabe's personal accounts -- has won near-exclusive dominance of everything from mineral rights to labor standards, as well as the apparent acquiescence of local politicians and police. Zimbabwe is far from a Chinese colony. The country is politically and militarily sovereign, but as China's economic hold tightens, the African nation's independence is becoming harder to distinguish.

So far, the Zimbabweans who are most feeling China's influence in their country are the workers. As Chinese firms take over business and Chinese managers come to run everything from billion-dollar mining companies to the downtown restaurants in capital Harare, Zimbabwean workers and labor unions are complaining of mistreatment and exploitation. Earlier this month, construction workers went on strike over low pay -- $4 per day -- and what they said were regular beatings by their managers Chinese managers with the Anhui Foreign Economic Construction Company. The case is just one of many that has labor groups -- one of the few segments of Zimbabwean politics that enjoys latitude from the ruling party -- up in arms.

Reports of beatings by Chinese managers are so common that even a cook at Harare's popular China Garden restaurant complained of them, telling the Zimbabwe Mail & Guardian, "Working for these men from the East is hell on earth."

"Workers continue to endure various forms of physical torture at the hands of these Chinese employers right under the noses of the authorities," a spokesperson for the the Zimbabwe Construction and Allied Trade Workers' Union told the same newspaper. "One of the most disturbing developments is that most of the Chinese employers openly boast that they have government protection and so nothing can be done to them. This clearly indicates that the issue has more serious political connotations than we can imagine."

The labor spokesperson's fears of political capture are probably not misplaced. China has adeptly co-opted much of the country's political leadership, buying impunity for Chinese managers as well as control over much of Zimbabwe's economy. China recently paid $3 billion for exclusive access to Zimbabwe's extensive platinum rights, a contract estimated to be worth $40 billion. It might seem surprising that Mugabe would take such a lopsided deal, but platinum is both expensive and time-consuming to extract. His country has a national debt of $7.1 billion, which is larger than the national GDP, and with his regime so isolated from the international community, few other sources of investment.

But don't feel too sorry for Mugabe -- Zimbabwe-watchers suspect that the autocratic president benefits personally from these kinds of deals from China. It's not hard to find the payoff -- he keeps a large (and heavily guarded) mansion in Hong Kong, where he is often seen on shopping sprees under the guard of Chinese special police. Mugabe also depends on his Hong Kong home for another reason: because the sanctioned leader cannot legally travel to Europe, he will need a place of safe refuge if he is ever ousted from power. The 87-year-old ruler even relies on Chinese medical treatment. Like the French-imposed monarchs of 19th century North Africa, or the Soviet-sponsored premiers of Cold War-era Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Mugabe is coming to depend on his Chinese sponsor for his personal economic and physical well-being.

China's grasp on Zimbabwe extends beyond even the African country's economy and political system. A massive military compound is under construction in Harare, built by Chinese firms and with a Chinese loan of $98 million. The open-ended loan, which the already indebted Zimbabwean government has no obvious way of paying back, means that this component of the country's military will be effectively Chinese-owned. Because Mugabe relies on the military not just for defending the borders but for maintaining the oppression that keeps him in power, the expensive facility will hand a small but important part of Zimbabwean sovereignty over to Chinese lenders.

This isn't the first time that Zimbabwe has relied on China for its security needs. During the 2008 political crisis, when Mugabe deployed violence to retain control of the country after declaring victory in a heavily disputed election, South African dock workers discovered that China was shipping in weapons for Mugabe's army. There's no telling what Mugabe promised in exchange for the guns he needed to maintain control, but the effect has been to deepen China's influence over what happens, and who rules, in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe's combination of debt, political reliance, and now military reliance -- not to mention the increasing number of local and national businesses under Chinese supervision -- has blurred the line between Chinese investment in Zimbabwe and Chinese control over Zimbabwe. And though this case of Chinese encroachment in Africa may be an extreme example -- due in large part to the political and economic vacuum that Western sanctions have left in Zimbabwe -- it is far from the only one. China recently signed a deal with Mauritania, for example, for 25 years of control of the country's economically important fishing resources. In 2006, China paid Mozambique $2 billion for a deal to dam off the Zambezi river and send 3,000 settlers to populate the valley, some of the country's most fertile land. China is snatching up agricultural land across the continent, often with leases nearing a century in length.

For now, in Zimbabwe and elsewhere, China appears to be using its newfound leverage mostly for economic gain. But it's not hard to foresee a day when it could exert its enormous influence over African domestic politics or even foreign policy. To what end China would turn its African beneficiaries into African proxies, and what that would mean for the billions of people led by African governments increasingly reliant on Chinese sponsorship, only time will tell.
 
Top