Russia has 'unstoppable' supersonic nuclear missile that cannot be traced by Western defence systems

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
23,844
Reputation
5,576
Daps
94,339
:russell: Cold War 2.0 of course we're back to bullshytting about superweapons. Reagan said we'd have fukking death lasers in space to destroy Russian ICBM's, this is just more posturing and dumbass "look how strong I am" from the worlds most insecure strongman.

The US likely has comparable weapon platforms.:yeshrug:
The fukked up thing about that death lasers in space wars shyt was the moron Reagan used that idiotic project as an excuse not to compromise with Gorbachev on nuclear disarmament...

Gorbachev practically begged that moron to sign the treaty because the Soviets were going broke trying to keep up with the Amerikkkans in the arms race...The treaty if signed would have desolved the bulk of the Russian and Amerikkkan nuclear arsenals but Reagan wouldn't sign because star wars...:snoop:
 

Shogun

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,329
Reputation
5,891
Daps
62,393
Reppin
Knicks
Edit:
Well Putin also did say he would halve Russian poverty or something ridiculous in the same speech I'm assuming. Woke up to all these stupid alerts :mjlol:



A Russia with with life expectancy rates that emulate France and Japan


:duck:


There's more, I think this was meant for internal consumption
I think Trump actually believes his bullshyt, though.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,648
Reppin
The Deep State
The fukked up thing about that death lasers in space wars shyt was the moron Reagan used that idiotic project as an excuse not to compromise with Gorbachev on nuclear disarmament...

Gorbachev practically begged that moron to sign the treaty because the Soviets were going broke trying to keep up with the Amerikkkans in the arms race...The treaty if signed would have desolved the bulk of the Russian and Amerikkkan nuclear arsenals but Reagan wouldn't sign because star wars...:snoop:
I think you fell for the bait.

Russia would never honor the deal

Just like the Americans would never honor the deal.

We won't ever disarm. Why would we?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,648
Reppin
The Deep State
Low key Russian kinda culture dictates that a man like Trump is not even truly a real man

- Dodges his duty to be part of his countries military in a time of war
- Is an out of shape fatboy who only plays golf
- Is visibly shaken when confronted VERBALLY
- Sold out his country for $$$
- Is a traitor
Basically.

You're either in or out

He's not in. :usure:
 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
7,703
Reputation
905
Daps
23,888
Reppin
Philadelphia

Midwest

Hanging em up
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
5,682
Reputation
406
Daps
11,487
Reppin
80's babies
Lol announce u have a untraceable nuke so we can trace it lol. You don’t have a damn conference telling your enemy top secret military shyt if it was really about to attack. See Pearl Harbor.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
68,576
Reputation
8,017
Daps
207,984
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
We probably got a nuke pointed at putin crib at all times. He need to settle his ass down:dahell:

Both the US and Russia have nukes pointed at each other at all times. Nothing new.

In 2002, the U.S. unilaterally ended the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty. In 2004 the U.S. and NATO included global missile defense into their strategic nuclear forces’ drills. Since then Russia has continuously warned that it will have to respond to such a development.

When the ABM treaty had come into force it created stability by guaranteeing Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). If one side would fire its nuclear armed intercontinental missiles onto the other side that side would respond by firing its own missiles. Thus both states would be destroyed. MAD guaranteed that neither had any interest in starting such a war in the first place.

With a missile defense shield the balance changes. A first strike becomes possible because the missile shield can defeat the retaliating strike. Since the U.S. terminated the ABM agreement it has constantly built up its missile defense to the Russian border and thus the Russians felt their survival is threatened. They truly believe a first strike by the US will happen.
 

NY's #1 Draft Pick

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,852
Reputation
6,680
Daps
100,778
Reppin
305
Both the US and Russia have nukes pointed at each other at all times. Nothing new.

In 2002, the U.S. unilaterally ended the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty. In 2004 the U.S. and NATO included global missile defense into their strategic nuclear forces’ drills. Since then Russia has continuously warned that it will have to respond to such a development.

When the ABM treaty had come into force it created stability by guaranteeing Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). If one side would fire its nuclear armed intercontinental missiles onto the other side that side would respond by firing its own missiles. Thus both states would be destroyed. MAD guaranteed that neither had any interest in starting such a war in the first place.

With a missile defense shield the balance changes. A first strike becomes possible because the missile shield can defeat the retaliating strike. Since the U.S. terminated the ABM agreement it has constantly built up its missile defense to the Russian border and thus the Russians felt their survival is threatened. They truly believe a first strike by the US will happen.
We should’ve stayed in the treaty for our own safety but dude is out here showing the world what he’s capable of and even shows us maps of where he’s willing to strike. That’s a threat:birdman:
 
Top