Salary Caps Should Be Illegal

Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
1,245
Reputation
80
Daps
3,210
Reppin
NULL
I mean I could be wrong but dont the nfl and nba players get like 49 or 50% of revenue? I think I remember those numbers from the last couple cbas.
I've never had a job where the owner gave us half the money. Not even close. So yeah basically seems about fair :yeshrug:
 

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
185,454
Reputation
14,805
Daps
364,778
Reppin
NULL
Ballmer is worth an est. 160 billion (6th richest person in the world).

He'd literally buy championships.

The NBA season would essentially become Clippers simulating games on easy mode against the other 10-14 teams. It'd completely drain the competitive hold that the league currently has and the players on the bottom teams would just show up to collect a check. You'd only have 2-4 teams who'd be competitive and it'll essentially be a re-run of the same players and same teams every other game.


Facts
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,170
Reputation
10,142
Daps
240,362
@FTBS

The mistake you're making is thinking that the same variance in baseball and soccer holds true in basketball. It doesn't. There are considerably far fewer variables in hoops given the probability of scoring on a possession. Soccer and baseball are almost entirely games of single digit scoring. Whereas the league-average scoring possessions in a NBA game this season was 100+ (FGM and FTA).

That means whoever has the most talent will win 9 times out of 10.

On the note of the other owners letting him in -

If Ballmer wasn't allowed to own a NBA team, wouldn't that then essentially put a net worth cap on the owners who could enter the NBA, meaning there'd still ultimately be a salary cap?
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
28,202
Reputation
3,240
Daps
80,441
You talking about the nfl where salaries are not guaranteed and they collude to flat out not pay players money and not pay certain positions?

The NFL where top QBs get their money and there's no hard cap on the max they can get, yeah.
 

Bop Gun

Turn Me Loose, We Shall Overcome
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,283
Reputation
702
Daps
6,131
Reppin
210 via 201
Unlimited cap would kill small market teams

Good. Every year in the Playoffs, each team somehow only has 7 or 8 players who can get on the court? It's ridiculous. Too many teams is diluting the product.

No salary cap would make the product better, get rid of the bums who are relegated to the ends of the bench, lesser teams so more squads can have a 5 on, 5 off system, and the true top players can bank 250m/yr contracts like in soccer because they are battling it out against the true best players.

It's annoying seeing backups dominate and show off their moves in offseason pickup leagues, but in the NBA they aren't skilled enough to create their own shot.
 

RhodyRum

Mark Gassed-A-Heaux
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
9,813
Reputation
6,450
Daps
45,062
Reppin
The Great Green North
So why don't the players do something about it then?

People are bytching on behalf of the players when they could do something about it if they really wanted to.

When you didn't have a father in your life to aggrieve for, you have to attach yourself to a father figure and overcompensate on the aggrieving, would be my wild guess. :unimpressed:
 

Bboystyle

FIRE MATT LAFLEUR
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
47,605
Reputation
5,362
Daps
80,161
Reppin
So. Cal
Good. Every year in the Playoffs, each team somehow only has 7 or 8 players who can get on the court? It's ridiculous. Too many teams is diluting the product.

No salary cap would make the product better, get rid of the bums who are relegated to the ends of the bench, lesser teams so more squads can have a 5 on, 5 off system, and the true top players can bank 250m/yr contracts like in soccer because they are battling it out against the true best players.

It's annoying seeing backups dominate and show off their moves in offseason pickup leagues, but in the NBA they aren't skilled enough to create their own shot.
Good? Driving small market teams out the league is good to you? :what:

Watching the same big market teams go at it year in and out is good to you?
 

Bop Gun

Turn Me Loose, We Shall Overcome
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,283
Reputation
702
Daps
6,131
Reppin
210 via 201
Good? Driving small market teams out the league is good to you? :what:

Watching the same big market teams go at it year in and out is good to you?

The Lakers just had a game where nobody subbed in for the entire second half. It is clear the talent is too spread out from having too many teams.

I'm also sick of watching only 6, 7 or 8 players get burn come playoff time. It's clear many of these guys aren't NBA material.

Less teams = more quality teams. Cheap owners need not apply.
 

Double Burger With Cheese

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
27,609
Reputation
17,231
Daps
161,845
Reppin
Atlanta
So what if yall had a job, and the owner told you, I don’t care how much money you generate, I will never pay you over X dollars? Do you think that would be fair? Would you bring up parity around the office or would you want your salary potential to be uncapped?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
199,092
Reputation
26,956
Daps
639,415
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
I'm going to go through this slowly. If you were to eliminate the salary cap, that means small market teams would have a lot of trouble competing. If small market teams cannot compete, nobody is going to watch them or attend the games. That puts those small markets in jeopardy and with that, it puts players jobs in jeopardy.

If a league can sustain 30 teams. That's extra jobs for players. If a league can only sustain 20 teams. That's a lot fewer. Do you understand the simple math?
 

Big Boss

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
185,454
Reputation
14,805
Daps
364,778
Reppin
NULL
I'm going to go through this slowly. If you were to eliminate the salary cap, that means small market teams would have a lot of trouble competing. If small market teams cannot compete, nobody is going to watch them or attend the games. That puts those small markets in jeopardy and with that, it puts players jobs in jeopardy.

If a league can sustain 30 teams. That's extra jobs for players. If a league can only sustain 20 teams. That's a lot fewer. Do you understand the simple math?


Facts
 
Top