Saw Hidden Colors 1 & 2 and have some MAJOR beefs with some of the concepts. WATCH THE MOVIE FIRST!

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Are you insinuating that whites, in this country, has never used science as a means of subjugating black people?

I'm insinuating that even considering that, that science itself is not a tool of supremacy. Agendas are.

There are a lot of debunked and discarded endeavors under the guise of science.

That includes Eugenics, Phrenology, and Astrology.

 

[bouncy]

Which even if its true doesn't matter since HIV HAS IT WITHIN ITSELF.

This is just further skepticism used to make it seem like HIV and supporting data around it is less solid than it is.

THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!. YOU CAN'T SAY WHAT IS HIV, AND WHAT ISN'T, IF OTHER CELLS HAVE THE SAME APPEARANCE.

ARE YOU REALLY STUDYING SCIENCE?.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The more I read his posts, the more I realize he doesn't really know or at least, understand the things he are posting. He is saying epistemology isn't biased on biased, then says stop equating mental health research with biological research, when epistemology is a philosophy!. Yes, you can say epistemology isn't biased but, someone who has an agenda can easily be biased if they see something while doing biological research. It's called being a trickster. I show you something, then tell you it means something, when it may not mean that at all but, the reason I interpret it one way is because of how I view things or what I have knowledge of. That doesn't mean that is what the finding IS.

Agenda =/= Data.

Completely different.

I'm not defending bullshyt like drapetomania or eugenics.

People will always have agendas for whatever reason, but it doesn't change the finding.

Thats like saying the speed of light differs depending on if you're a republican or a democrat.

"Science" is not a thing.

Science is a process. To the lesser minded or to someone who is simply unaware of what this means, its far easier to perpetuate things that appear objective when they are actually agendas.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!. YOU CAN'T SAY WHAT IS HIV, AND WHAT ISN'T, IF OTHER CELLS HAVE THE SAME APPEARANCE.

ARE YOU REALLY STUDYING SCIENCE?.

Which doesn't make any sense.

Think about this.

HIV does exist.

Right?

We're clear on that...right?

I've looked through electron microscopes. I've been in these labs.

We can REALLY go there if you want to.

Now, if there even are cells that produce rev. transcriptase, it doesn't change what HIV itself does.

Do you not understand that?

 

[bouncy]

Agenda =/= Data.

Completely different.

I'm not defending bullshyt like drapetomania or eugenics.

People will always have agendas for whatever reason, but it doesn't change the finding.

Thats like saying the speed of light differs depending on if you're a republican or a democrat.

"Science" is not a thing.

Science is a process. To the lesser minded or to someone who is simply unaware of what this means, its far easier to perpetuate things that appear objective when they are actually agendas.

My man, of course agenda does not equal data BUT, you can manipulate data to put forth your agenda. It is only when people see the data differently from what they were told, that we question things. People like you don't like that are call these people idiots. Which some are but, if you are a scientists you question everything even your own testings because, one thing you did could have gave you a conclusion that may be "wrong", or the cause of what you're seeing.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

@J-Nice was the only dude to actually drop that actual factual so nikkas can read up on the works of different authors. It was just like in the previous thread on the subject. A bunch of dudes saying how much the film got wrong, not even posting a link to what they believe to accurate information, then hiding behind the bullshyt "I'm just trying to help black people" banner.

And even some of the people he listed have been proven wrong on their contributions.

My nikka, if this is something you are so interested in, then fact check the shyt yourself. You're just proving the fact that a lot of you nikkas don't know shyt about shyt outside of what this dude tells you. Doc has been out for a couple of years now and you're still asking other grown men to spoon feed you.

One of them nikkas is blatantly stealing Meso-American culture and y'all nikkas only go along with it because in some kind of petty way it makes you feel better about being black, even though you hate it when white people do the same to black history.

No one's going to research all of this shyt only to have y'all deny the shyt anyway (which I have done in this thread and you smart dumb nikkas keep ignoring it for stuff that favors your opinions).

shyt's just like rampant goose chase and it's frankly just easier to watch you posin' negros run around like chickens with your heads cut off.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@lotty, whats your view on SIV?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

My man, of course agenda does not equal data BUT, you can manipulate data to put forth your agenda. It is only when people see the data differently from what they were told, that we question things. People like you don't like that are call these people idiots. Which some are but, if you are a scientists you question everything even your own testings because, one thing you did could have gave you a conclusion that may be "wrong", or the cause of what you're seeing.

Son. I'm skimming through your video and ALL of the criticisms live in the margins of data that make it seem like the criticism you find in EVERY paper EVER written. Its called academic honesty.

Yes. Some procedures didn't work the way you'd expect. Yes. Some things were sloppy. Some things could have been done better.

But in the process of discovery, things don't go neatly.

But I do want to know your thoughts on every other virus...since you don't have a problem with those existing.

I'd LOVE for you to tell me what HIV is then.

Let me guess. A conspiracy to kill da black man! A big pharma drug run! An attempt to conslidate a government fukk up!

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@lotty, since HIV doesn't exist, please tell me how AZT works.

 

[bouncy]

@lotty, since HIV doesn't exist, please tell me how AZT works.

Like I stated you didn't look at the original video because it's not that it doesn't exist but, the way were told. That is why I put real in quotation marks. That is also why I didn't tell you everything, I wanted to see if you would actually watch the video or just disagree to do it.

For the record, I never said I agree or disagree, just what was your opinion. I wanted to learn more about you but, I think you're not who you say you are. You're playing Mr. Big because you have an issue with black people whether you admit it or not. I told you in the other thread about Jay-z, this is a big boy game, and you fell into my trap again. Once you learn the sciences in all ways not just what you read, then we can have a good discussion but, right now you are just learning things so you will not understand most of what I say if it goes against what you were taught.

BTW, don't try to be slick, and mention siv, so you can put that into the equation of how hiv spread to man. I SEE YOUUUU!

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Like I stated you didn't look at the original video because it's not that it doesn't exist but, the way were told. That is why I put real in quotation marks. That is also why I didn't tell you everything, I wanted to see if you would actually watch the video or just disagree to do it.

For the record, I never said I agree or disagree, just what was your opinion. I wanted to learn more about you but, I think you're not who you say you are. You're playing Mr. Big because you have an issue with black people whether you admit it or not. I told you in the other thread about Jay-z, this is a big boy game, and you fell into my trap again. Once you learn the sciences in all ways not just what you read, then we can have a good discussion but, right now you are just learning things so you will not understand most of what I say if it goes against what you were taught.

BTW, don't try to be slick, and mention siv, so you can put that into the equation of how hiv spread to man. I SEE YOUUUU!

I'm black dumbass. LOL

Oh...and viruses jump all the time. Thats why HIV bears so much in common with SIV.

You'd just LOVE to escape having to deal with the fact that eating bush meat isn't always a good idea.

 

[bouncy]

I'm black dumbass. LOL

Oh...and viruses jump all the time. Thats why HIV bears so much in common with SIV.

You'd just LOVE to escape having to deal with the fact that eating bush meat isn't always a good idea.

I know you're black, that means nothing. Black people hate each other more then their enemy a lot of times.

I see you just had to let me know how siv effects animals, and humans, to show others how "smart" you are. You must have very low self esteem. I also see you had to throw a low key dis towards blacks in there as well. You need to grow up my man. Humble yourself, and you will be shocked how much real knowledge will come your way. Watch you shyt on that statement as well.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I know you're black, that means nothing. Black people hate each other more then their enemy a lot of times.

I see you just had to let me know how siv effects animals, and humans, to show others how "smart" you are. You must have very low self esteem. I also see you had to throw a low key dis towards blacks in there as well. You need to grow up my man. Humble yourself, and you will be shocked how much real knowledge will come your way. Watch you shyt on that statement as well.

nikka. fukk outta my face with all this shyt.

You stay trying to discount evidence based on flaws on central founding papers from 20 years ago.

How come NONE of your criticism deals with the work done since then, the drug targets developed since then, or any of the greater genetic mapping or alleles of the virus now understood?

The best you can do is this amateur ass video about flaws in the founding papers of HIV from a woman with an axe to grind? Really now?

 

[bouncy]

nikka. fukk outta my face with all this shyt.

You stay trying to discount evidence based on flaws on central founding papers from 20 years ago.

How come NONE of your criticism deals with the work done since then, the drug targets developed since then, or any of the greater genetic mapping or alleles of the virus now understood?

The best you can do is this amateur ass video about flaws in the founding papers of HIV from a woman with an axe to grind? Really now?

I SEE YOUUUUU!

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I SEE YOUUUUU!

You...don't see much.

Thats kinda the problem.

The best you can do is to TRY and point out flaws (of which there aren't many if any at all) and to try and catch the researchers making contradictory themselves (who discovered HIV each independently within 1.5 years of each other) by splicing audio and comments to suit whatever aim you're trying to reach.

I'd love to see you approach Polio with the same skepticism.

Or Herpes. There really can't be all those simplexes...can there?