smoking man
still breathin
At what Point?
"scientists claim we came from apes but they lies though"
- Thread starter smoking man
- Start date
It's a THEORY.. and just like anyone who believes in what they believe they pass it along and teach it as fact.
Furthermore, the "commom" ancestor they speak of in that theory is indeed more ape than anything we know as human. More like the Mother Ape of humans and apes. SMH... So what the "Mother Ape" evolved from becomes the same investigative theory all over again.
Furthermore, the "commom" ancestor they speak of in that theory is indeed more ape than anything we know as human. More like the Mother Ape of humans and apes. SMH... So what the "Mother Ape" evolved from becomes the same investigative theory all over again.
Goatpoacher
Superstar
You dont respect your life and hate yourself obviously. It seems turning from God and thinking you know what you do not has only made you into a demonic beast, instead of an intelligent and open minded man of science.
Its so demonic, friend.
Any "open minded man of science" would not buy a series of conclusions packaged as hypotheses. That's as demonic as your hairline my friend.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
I mean atheists believe that humans branched off from Lucy correct who was a form of a chimpanzee?
Goatpoacher
Superstar
It's a THEORY.. and just like anyone who believes in what they believe they pass it along and teach it as fact.
Furthermore, the "commom" ancestor they speak of in that theory is indeed more ape than anything we know as human. More like the the Mother Ape of humans and apes. SMH... So what the "Mother Ape" evolved from becomes the same investigative theory all over again.
A theory in this sense is different from common usage. "Relativity" is only a theory, but one that is very strongly established and supported by tests. Take blue and red shift, and the measurement of gravity altering light that was conducted decades ago.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Isnt that what evolution is. A series of packaged hypotheses since theres really no proof and nothing that can be duplicated that says, yes, this is how man first came to be.
Evolution is not a theory you can prove. Period.
Goatpoacher
Superstar
No. First, a theory sets forth predictions, and tests validate or invalidate the predictions. Evolution is actually demonstrably true, as we see with bacteria and other short lived organisms. Take the example of the moths in England that turned grey to blend in better with pollution.
Second, creationism is based on the conclusions, i.e., there is a God or a Creator, and then they selectively choose "evidence" in support of this conclusion.
We know that evolution occurs. It's a very simple, elegant concept. I don't think your kind really understands.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
I believe thats why its called the theory of evolution. Friends often forget these important facts.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Turning grey to blend in and turning into a different species with a completely different internal system are 2 different things, friend. So far all we've seen are the small things. Where are all the transitional forms right now friend? Why arent scientists able to see some animal getting ready to turn into a completely different species and able to predict what it will become. The theory is flawed and sadly, you're going along for the ride. They throw out stuff you believe in right now for new theories and you just go with the flow with no apologies for sounding like a no it all who was in the wrong.
Its so demonic, friend.
Goatpoacher
Superstar
Evolution is sort of two things. One is a series of demonstrable events that humans have observed. The other is a larger explanation of the diversity of life. If I recall correctly, Darwin (PBUH) never really used Evolution to explain the creation of life and its diversity, he used to it to explain species divergence.
Most importantly, the fact that a theory has not been proven in the scientific world does not mean that said theory is not an established paradigm under which scientists conduct further work. You need to understand that in the science based world, something is only a LAW once it is mathematically proven.
It took centuries, plus some cheating, just to prove that 1+1 = 2. Despite the fact said thing is not proven, you can safely use basic math in every day life.
thekidfromqueens
the best borough
nas is the goat but he is on some other shyt sometimes. i might have stopped listening to that one song on distant relatives where he was like satellites are causing earthquakes.
smoking man
still breathin
Back when this was the evolutionary chart, friend. Or did you forget that this was actually taught in schools.
I mean atheists believe that humans branched off from Lucy correct who was a form of a chimpanzee?
so you think nas intention with this line was to challenge a pre-existing scientific notion that wasnt even actual at the time he said it?
it doesnt say "scientists claimed.."
nas is the goat but he is on some other shyt sometimes. i might have stopped listening to that one song on distant relatives where he was like satellites are causing earthquakes.
but lets be real they are not stopping them.
think about it.
