Serious questions about Christianity.

[AyahuascaSippin]

Was his name jesus, yeshua or emanuel?

why do his current holidays have more to do with horus and the soltices?

if he spent his life teaching not to judge, how can christians judge other religions?

do you honestly believe that he would have looked at a church with his corpse nailed to a cross like "seems legit"

do you honestly believe that if he was alive, he would condone taxes, resource wars, and banking cartels?

do you honestly believe that if he was alive, he would condone drone strikes?


if he was killed by the jews, why do they run shyt? was judas the real success story here?

was he really that white?

if he spent his life helping the forgotten members of society.. why do christian countries contain so many cracks for people to fall through and rot?

 

[Thsnnor]

Was his name jesus, yeshua or emanuel?

why do his current holidays have more to do with horus and the soltices?

if he spent his life teaching not to judge, how can christians judge other religions?

do you honestly believe that he would have looked at a church with his corpse nailed to a cross like "seems legit"

do you honestly believe that if he was alive, he would condone taxes, resource wars, and banking cartels?

do you honestly believe that if he was alive, he would condone drone strikes?


if he was killed by the jews, why do they run shyt? was judas the real success story here?

was he really that white?

if he spent his life helping the forgotten members of society.. why do christian countries contain so many cracks for people to fall through and rot?

Translated from the Greek we get Jesus. In Hebrew Yeshua.

Jesus was born in the spring. The holiday of Christmas is a pagan holiday with no basis in christianity. Didn't you see how fast they got rid of the manger tho.

Jesus actually said judge not lest ye be judged by the same measure in which ye judge ye shall also be judged. Basically making sure you aren't doing wrong trying to tell someone else about the same wrong and when you judge make sure they are true.

Each religion makes exclusive claims that if you are a member and follow it you have to discount them as your religion says so. Christianity is the belief in Jesus and with God and the 10 commandments which one states Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

If Jesus were alive and here again he would say the same as before. Render to the government which is the government and give unto God which is God's.

Jesus was born a Jew and by being rejected the Gospel could be given unto the Gentiles. Jesus told Pilate He that delivered me to you has the greater sin. Judas did not win.

The Bible says Jesus physical description was nothing special and he was ordinary. In Judea people looked Mediterranean. Curly hair, tanned skin, beards, dark colored eyes. Blond hair and blue eyes would have stuck out back then.

Some are Christian in name only and others are Sunday attendees. They are there but don't accept Jesus personally. People who are christians will fall vs the pretenders. Those who fall should repent and ask forgiveness. People think once they accept Jesus that is it but it is not. Can't continue to do what it do and expect people to take you seriously.

 

[acri1]

Take a look at what that person stands for. If he makes a false claim then we will call him out on it. Btw if you are referring to global warming its been proven wrong. Less than 8% of scientists are claiming that and the evidence has been proven doctored.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ERL.....8b4024C

We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991-2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors’ self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.

 

[Thsnnor]

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ERL.....8b4024C

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/en...s/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

 

[acri1]

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/en...s/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence

While polls of scientists actively working in the filed of climate science indicate strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor, 31,000 scientists say there is "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause "catastrophic" heating of the atmosphere.

So "strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor" = "Global warming has been proven wrong"?




Also, the very same link you posted points out that this was just an online survey that somebody put on a website and was completely unreliable since there was no verification that the participants were or are actually scientists. Any actual legit studies show a huge consensus on this issue. So basically..

 

[Thsnnor]

So "strong general agreement that Earth is warming and human activity is a significant factor" = "Global warming has been proven wrong"?




Also, the very same link you posted points out that this was just an online survey that somebody put on a website and was completely unreliable since there was no verification that the participants were or are actually scientists. Any actual legit studies show a huge consensus on this issue. So basically..

That is my point. Your study was funded by the people who wanted to press global warming and mine is a survey.

Always follow the money. In business, personal and even religion... always follow the money.

 

[acri1]

That is my point. Your study was funded by the people who wanted to press global warming and mine is a survey.

Always follow the money. In business, personal and even religion... always follow the money.

So it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, what matters is who's funding the study?

And we're ignoring that the supposedly unbiased "survey" you're talking about was on a website that has a petition against the Kyoto Protocol?

And we're ignoring that the poll you posted was completely unscientific and anybody could've voted on it?

And we're ignoring that even the link you posted references the fact that 97% of Climate Scientists agree that global warming is real and human caused?



I'm depressed that I live on the same planet as somebody this dense and caught up in their own bias.

I'd rather you just keep it 100 and say "I don't believe in Global Warming because of Jesus" than sit around pretending it's a rational position.

 

[Thsnnor]

So it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, what matters is who's funding the study?

And we're ignoring that the supposedly unbiased "survey" you're talking about was on a website that has a petition against the Kyoto Protocol?

And we're ignoring that the poll you posted was completely unscientific and anybody could've voted on it?

And we're ignoring that even the link you posted references the fact that 97% of Climate Scientists agree that global warming is real and human caused?



I'm depressed that I live on the same planet as somebody this dense and caught up in their own bias.

I'd rather you just keep it 100 and say "I don't believe in Global Warming because of Jesus" than sit around pretending it's a rational position.

My belief in Jesus has nothing to do with global warming. We could post articles back and forth but what is the point. I put follow the money in since it will lead to the truth. If your study was funded by AL Gore what would you think? For decades smoking studies were funded by Philip Morris and the industry. They said it was safe. We now know better but we were lied to by people with no remorse.

Always follow the money. Find out who is paying for what? Can't stress it enough.

 

[acri1]

My belief in Jesus has nothing to do with global warming. We could post articles back and forth but what is the point. I put follow the money in since it will lead to the truth. If your study was funded by AL Gore what would you think? For decades smoking studies were funded by Philip Morris and the industry. They said it was safe. We now know better but we were lied to by people with no remorse.

Always follow the money. Find out who is paying for what? Can't stress it enough.

Money has nothing to do with whether or not the atmosphere is warming up due to human activities. It's either happening or it isn't.

 

[Thsnnor]

Money has nothing to do with whether or not the atmosphere is warming up due to human activities. It's either happening or it isn't.

*sigh* Overall the earth is cooler now than during the great depression by around 3 degrees. However the government is saying global warming and so is the U.K.

If the global warming theory is going to be accepted then farmers and other groups are going to be taxed. If you want to look up taxing cow flatulence.

 

[AyahuascaSippin]

If Jesus were alive and here again he would say the same as before. Render to the government which is the government and give unto God which is Gods

Respect for the level headed response.. as for the judgement part, I cant see how a person who travelled with the poor, disabled and downtrodden (prostitutes etc) would accept the 'modern day christian' especially when most modern christians reside in almost satanic countries where there seems to be more impotus on status, deceit and gaining an advantage then actually being a community for the people.. all the while deeming countries that actually dont consume everything in site and pray for more money as 'undeveloped'

if jesus actually said that god and government quote, then he would have been talking about a government which didnt rely so heavily on public tribute.. modern jesus would probably slap a bytch after the 50th time of being called crazy

 

[Thsnnor]

Respect for the level headed response.. as for the judgement part, I cant see how a person who travelled with the poor, disabled and downtrodden (prostitutes etc) would accept the 'modern day christian' especially when most modern christians reside in almost satanic countries where there seems to be more impotus on status, deceit and gaining an advantage then actually being a community for the people.. all the while deeming countries that actually dont consume everything in site and pray for more money as 'undeveloped'

if jesus actually said that god and government quote, then he would have been talking about a government which didnt rely so heavily on public tribute.. modern jesus would probably slap a bytch after the 50th time of being called crazy

The current modern day christian actually removes Jesus from the picture. Check out the Jesus Seminar if you want to. It's scary stuff. It's important to make the distinction since people do many different things in different names. Like the founder of the TBN which shows all religious programming was an atheist. Cannot look at the surface to get a good look at a person.

Many of these charities have 90% + administrative costs it isn't right.

Modern Jesus would do very little as they have kicked Him out and talk more about happiness and the golden rule kinda thing. Ever seen a Joel Osteen sermon? It's like 2% Bible and 98% feel good? That isn't right.

Check out reformed christian and it will give you a wake up call.

 

[Everythingg]

What do we make of the (alleged) false prophecies Jesus made in Matthew 16:27 regards to Deut 18:22?

Do you believe in Paul? Or do you consider him a false apostle according to Revelation 2:2?

Do you believe that Jesus is God Almighty?

 

[Won Won]

*sigh* Overall the earth is cooler now than during the great depression by around 3 degrees.

Link?


Global Mean Annual Temperature
Average per Decade
Decade °C °F
1880s 13.73 56.71
1890s 13.75 56.74
1900s 13.74 56.73
1910s 13.72 56.70
1920s 13.83 56.89
1930s 13.96 57.12
1940s 14.04 57.26
1950s 13.98 57.16
1960s 13.99 57.18
1970s 14.00 57.20
1980s 14.18 57.52
1990s 14.31 57.76
2000s 14.51 58.12

 

[Thsnnor]

What do we make of the (alleged) false prophecies Jesus made in Matthew 16:27 regards to Deut 18:22?

Do you believe in Paul? Or do you consider him a false apostle according to Revelation 2:2?

Do you believe that Jesus is God Almighty?

Deut 18:22 is referring to false prophets. We know certain events such as the temple being rebuilt has to occur. This month a pure red heifer was found and should be in Israel now. YouTube red heifer found as they have it on video. This will be only the 10th one since.

As I said Jesus will return but certain events need to happen first. My question is will people believe when Israel announces the building of the Temple since it was foretold in the Bible.

Jesus is one part of the Trinity. I think the Trinity could be explained like a triangle. 3 angles but 1 shape.