would it not be fair to assume that the most important aspect of the abrahamic faiths is an unnatural fear of not being a christian jew or muslim? thats so ridiculous.. Jesus was a man.. by the sound of it a good man.. but 2000 years later people are clinging to stories written over 1500 years which have little or no validity and wave them about out of an unhealthy fear of christian or whichever god..
your description of allah and god being different is laughable tbh.. the only differences are language and the fact that people who worship god have steadily shat on those who worship allah since the crusades.. so i guess jesus was a fan of crusades and the slave trade? since it brought him to so many new people? do you see how your commitment to everything christian seems ridiculous to people with a soul that dont worship white men?
Actually the biggest fear would have been finding yourself out of favor with God. In the O.T. There were the Jews (no christians yet) who left God, became enslaved and found God again. I think it's recorded as happening over 50 times. The accuracy is not in doubt of the NT.
The Verdict
What can we conclude from this evidence? New Testament specialist Daniel Wallace notes that although there are about 300,000 individual variations of the text of the New Testament, this number is very misleading. Most of the differences are completely inconsequential--spelling errors, inverted phrases and the like. A side by side comparison between the two main text families (the Majority Text and the modern critical text) shows agreement a full 98% of the time.[18]
Of the remaining differences, virtually all yield to vigorous textual criticism. This means that our New Testament is 99.5% textually pure. In the entire text of 20,000 lines, only 40 lines are in doubt (about 400 words), and none affects any significant doctrine.[19]
Greek scholar D.A. Carson sums up this way: "The purity of text is of such a substantial nature that nothing we believe to be true, and nothing we are commanded to do, is in any way jeopardized by the variants."[20]
This issue is no longer contested by non-Christian scholars, and for good reason. Simply put, if we reject the authenticity of the New Testament on textual grounds we'd have to reject every ancient work of antiquity and declare null and void every piece of historical information from written sources prior to the beginning of the second millennium A.D.
Has the New Testament been altered? Critical, academic analysis says it has not.
http://www.str.org/articles/is-the-new-testament-text-reliable#.U7K9WThMXZs
The crusades were between the Catholic Church and Muslims. Not Christians. The big difference between God and allah is God had a son allah didn't. The differences only grow from there. People have over the years used the Bible to advance their own personal agenda. Joseph Smith? David koresh? Jim Jones? Even if people choose not to believe at least know the difference as too not fall for false teaching.