murksiderock
Superstar
Five years ago if yall remember in real time, LaMarcus Aldridge was going into Year 10, fresh off his 3rd All-NBA nod and was considered one of the ten best players in The League, certainly considered an elite big. And you gotta remember the moment, that turned out to be Duncan's final season but remember how amped basketball media was that a fresh in-his-prime Aldridge would get to learn from The Big System (oops I mean Fundamental)?
The thought was that if LMA was that good dragging bums in Portland, he and Kawhi would be the new 1-2 in SA like Duncan/Parker and we were getting ready to see a new level of Aldridge for being directly under Timmy...
5 years later, the nikka yall should be comparing Webber to is Aldridge, not Duncan. Tons of talent but ultimately unrealized potential...
I was a huge Webber fan as a kid. He had a good career, but the idea he better than Timmy is bullshyt. Webber was on the decline from Year 11 on, so he couldn't sustain greatness for longer than a decade, loses to Timmy there. Also, Webber was not as reliable or nasty as Timmy in the playoffs, everybody knew this in real time...
C-Webb was only an elite player in Sacramento. Before Sac he was really good and exciting to watch but mostly a Top 15-20 type, and after Sac he was pretty much bum status. This is another cat Coli Basketball overrated here, based on a brilliant 5-year stretch in Sac...
Its insulting to compare Timmy to him. But you can compare Webb and Aldridge...
Shaq is wrong on this, once again becoming the 564337th wrong player opinion---->these guys played but they don't have infallible or unquestionable basketball minds...
And while I don't think anyone would argue that Peak Shaq wasn't better than Peak Timmy, you can make a serious argument that Tim overall was the better player, particularly given the fact Tim is an All-Time defender and had a more diverse offensive bag than Shaq...
The Big System truly benefited from the system but there's more than enough reason to believe he was the system...
The thought was that if LMA was that good dragging bums in Portland, he and Kawhi would be the new 1-2 in SA like Duncan/Parker and we were getting ready to see a new level of Aldridge for being directly under Timmy...
5 years later, the nikka yall should be comparing Webber to is Aldridge, not Duncan. Tons of talent but ultimately unrealized potential...
I was a huge Webber fan as a kid. He had a good career, but the idea he better than Timmy is bullshyt. Webber was on the decline from Year 11 on, so he couldn't sustain greatness for longer than a decade, loses to Timmy there. Also, Webber was not as reliable or nasty as Timmy in the playoffs, everybody knew this in real time...
C-Webb was only an elite player in Sacramento. Before Sac he was really good and exciting to watch but mostly a Top 15-20 type, and after Sac he was pretty much bum status. This is another cat Coli Basketball overrated here, based on a brilliant 5-year stretch in Sac...
Its insulting to compare Timmy to him. But you can compare Webb and Aldridge...
Shaq is wrong on this, once again becoming the 564337th wrong player opinion---->these guys played but they don't have infallible or unquestionable basketball minds...
And while I don't think anyone would argue that Peak Shaq wasn't better than Peak Timmy, you can make a serious argument that Tim overall was the better player, particularly given the fact Tim is an All-Time defender and had a more diverse offensive bag than Shaq...
The Big System truly benefited from the system but there's more than enough reason to believe he was the system...
, Shaq really doesn't know shyt. Even the biggest Dwight haters don't think Yao is better 

