Should America intervene in Syria?

[Mowgli]

If by intervene you mean destroy them so we can have better access to them hoes, yes.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

We're damned if we do, damned if we don't. I see no good way this ends for us besides maybe stopping a Russian ally, which isn't worth it.

Assad used chemical weapons on his own people and he destroyed his country keeping control of it. Everyone else is too p*ssy to do anything and the American public wont have another war in the ME. Let Russia keep selling them weapons. Who cares.

 

[CHL]

where's the outcry for the darfur genocide.....

Not just Darfur but Sudan and South Sudan in general.

 

[CHL]

That was the liberal outrage of the month like 5 years ago. They've cycled through like 50 fashionable outrages since then. It's tough to keep up, but I would bet that consulting Matt Damon's twitter feed will keep you updated.

Yup, all those liberal NGO's and UN organisations on the ground in Sudan sure are doing nothing.

 

[Shogun]

Yup, all those liberal NGO's and UN organisations on the ground in Sudan sure are doing nothing.

And I'm sure those that get their political agenda from George Clooney's twitter feed are still dedicated to the cause.

Plus, I wasn't aware that all was well in the Sudan. Thank you based Matt Damon

 

[Gains]

operation syrian freedom

 

[hashmander]

We're damned if we do, damned if we don't. I see no good way this ends for us besides maybe stopping a Russian ally, which isn't worth it.

Assad used chemical weapons on his own people and he destroyed his country keeping control of it. Everyone else is too p*ssy to do anything and the American public wont have another war in the ME. Let Russia keep selling them weapons. Who cares.

yup and when you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, you pick the cheaper (in blood and treasure) option every time and that's DOING NOTHING. but when you spend so much on military spending the pressure to just act like you're doing something is so fukking great. and americans are largely idiots. they don't want obama sending troops (the only way to do this shyt right: 300k of them running roughshod through that country), but they also want him to do something. what is that something? i dunno, but just do something.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

First deployment in decades:



These boys are happy

 

[hashmander]

that first pic the plane looks like a beater that's been patched up many times. WTF is that shyt? poots shoulda stayed out of that. russia's military tech is looking funny in the light. speak loudly and carry a little stick.

 

[rapbeats]

Civil War sponsored by the US. Look man, some countries need dictators, their's no other way when you got Islam involved, if you ain't choppin heads and gassin' nikkaz, terrorists don't fear you. You need to leave sh*t alone. Is Libya better now? Iraq? Egypt? I don't see who Arab Spring benefited. Let Assad stay and let Syria go back to being the peaceful country it was before this mess. Not every country is ready for democracy

hey, if you ask me i said drop a bomb on everything. including us. lol. and start from scratch. we can blow up all the racist here in the US and abroad, blow up all the terrorists, blow up all the western leadership that setup these middle eastern countries with some of these dictators to begin with. just blow it all up an start from scratch. lol. truth is , there is not PROPER way to do this. its all bad no matter how you look at it. because we've had our hand in putting some of these leaders into power decades ago, we've had are hand in creating some of these so called terrorist groups that have now gone rogue. but after all thats said you still got innocent people that dont have anything to do with either side dying everyday. so what do you do?

 

[rapbeats]

Salafis need dictators, brutal ones. America needs to let Russia do its thing and not lift a finger to help these Al Qaeda minded c*nts. Even the so called moderates are nothing more than AQ proxies.

If the US does anything it should be to ignore Russian and Syrian brutality and let them finish this off. Arming the terror groups as it has been wherever directly or not will only prolong this mess and destabilize Europe further more.

Helping the jihadists will be yet another Afghanistan, we're creating a new generation of bin ladens and we pretend like we dunno anything about it.

It's like we want the jihadists to prevail in order to invade in 5 years and control the gas pipelines while having israels back.

no, the hope is. we get rid of the current leadership that is anti american and anti israel. (or so we say ..lol) then put in new leadership thats pro israel and pro Us. thats what the US wants to happen.

 

[rapbeats]

FRANKLY... I'm tired of the US getting dragged into war or being in places where they dont belong. Let china and russia deal with the middle east, let them deal with ISIS, BOKO haram and the terrorist attacks and death to america chants let them be the world's policemen...

Frankly its tiring its the same shyt different day... it never changes...

we're in the middle east because we get oil from them as well as israel being dead in the middle of all that nonsense. so the US cant allow for any of those countries to get to powerful unless they have US/Western puppets as leadership.

 

[Max B]

no, the hope is. we get rid of the current leadership that is anti american and anti israel. (or so we say ..lol) then put in new leadership thats pro israel and pro Us. thats what the US wants to happen.

Sisi from egypt is perfect example

 

[ill]

Sisi from egypt is perfect example

Lets not act like Sisi is the first Egyptian leader thats warm to Israel.

 

[88m3]

Does bombing still count as intervention?