Should Ludacris get full custody of the child he tried to have aborted?

Should he?

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 52.7%
  • No

    Votes: 26 47.3%

  • Total voters
    55

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
36,174
Reputation
11,342
Daps
176,610
Reppin
Chicago
yes and hr sleohe slept with this woman and had a kid with her. So your point is?
At no Point did I insinuate she is a suitable mother...but I believe the blame in this outcome lies largely on his shoulders. Had he not had sex with her...all of this would not have happened. He can take the girl and 'raise her' doesn't change who the child's mother is.
My point is what it always has been: She's a proven unfit mother and he is justifiably the better equipped parent to raise the child, as the courts found. Who cares how the child came to be, she is here and he can provide an upbringing for her better than she can. He didnt
have sex" with her, they had sex TOGETHER. He did have more to lose, you are right but he also could afford to lose more than she did. The two are not mutually exclusive. We don't know the intricacies of his relationship with his fiance at the time they hooked up. We can assume he cheated and we might be right. But we don't know that to be the case and thats what you have so much vitriol towards this over. I can just as easily say its her fault that all this happened since he didn't rape the bytch and she isn't having sex with him unless she explicitly chose to do so which is why we're here.
 

Taadow

The StarchBishop™️
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
41,326
Reputation
10,179
Daps
103,073
Reppin
Crispness
yes and hr sleohe slept with this woman and had a kid with her. So your point is?
At no Point did I insinuate she is a suitable mother...but I believe the blame in this outcome lies largely on his shoulders. Had he not had sex with her...all of this would not have happened. He can take the girl and 'raise her' doesn't change who the child's mother is.

So now, "he" had sex with her...not "they had sex together"...and so because of him, this "outcome lies largely on his shoulders"
...not both of them equally.
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
My point is what it always has been: She's a proven unfit mother and he is justifiably the better equipped parent to raise the child, as the courts found. Who cares how the child came to be, she is here and he can provide an upbringing for her better than she can. He didnt
have sex" with her, they had sex TOGETHER. He did have more to lose, you are right but he also could afford to lose more than she did. The two are not mutually exclusive. We don't know the intricacies of his relationship with his fiance at the time they hooked up. We can assume he cheated and we might be right. But we don't know that to be the case and thats what you have so much vitriol towards this over.
The circumstance of a child being important...doesn't mean she can't be loved but it is a bad precedence.

men lile ludacris don't learn...they just thow money at a situation and call the woman they had mo problem sleeping with...a whore and think they are justified.

Personally, both parents are unfit...but a court's job is to work with the facts presented not to deeply analyze a situation.

Again, he slept with her...he has to live with the fact. As for the mother...she is works at a strip club...didn't he know this before getting involver with her?
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
So now, "he" had sex with her...not "they had sex together"...and so because of him, this "outcome lies largely on his shoulders"
...not both of them equally.
I emphasized him...because he is the one with a fiancee and the possibility of being chained to child support for al18 years.

The woman in this case is just a recipient. Had it been the other way around I would have said the same of the woman.

The question who has more to lose? Him not her.
 

Giselle

**********
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
11,296
Reputation
2,097
Daps
20,426
The point of all this is...he is engaged and now sleeping with other women? What willl he do when he is married.

He is being in that industry how long not to know this? It is clear...this woman is after a paycheck...but he has more to lose him or her?

I don't really understand what you're trying to say and he is already married.
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
So now, "he" had sex with her...not "they had sex together"...and so because of him, this "outcome lies largely on his shoulders"
...not both of them equally.
He is the one with a fiancé and millions...she has nothing...
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
@Yup making no sense again as usual
If dude cared to live as an upstanding men he wouldnt be getting strippers pregnant in the first place.

Eudoxie is an idiot

The stripper lady is an idiot

But ludacros ia the bigger idiot...what's so hard to understand?
 

Kobes Two Jerseys

8 or 24 best player of the era
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
9,462
Reputation
1,350
Daps
23,924
Reppin
Fistful of jewels
dumb nikka logic :snoop: now take it multiply it times millionz of nikkaIt'nd where da fukk would we be at now :stopitslime:? NONEXISTENT dumbass :pacspit: thank gawd most of us got some gaddamn sense
You have no sense at all. Many of us, are born to young parents. How many dudes at 17,18,19,20,21 really want a baby? Its Ok to say the truth.
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
You have no sense at all. Many of us, are born to young parents. How many dudes at 17,18,19,20,21 really want a baby? Its Ok to say the truth.
Wrong thread....and not all people are born to irresponsible parents. it's probably your area and the type of people youryou frequent don't pass that ish on others.
 
Top