My point is what it always has been: She's a proven unfit mother and he is justifiably the better equipped parent to raise the child, as the courts found. Who cares how the child came to be, she is here and he can provide an upbringing for her better than she can. He didntyes and hr sleohe slept with this woman and had a kid with her. So your point is?
At no Point did I insinuate she is a suitable mother...but I believe the blame in this outcome lies largely on his shoulders. Had he not had sex with her...all of this would not have happened. He can take the girl and 'raise her' doesn't change who the child's mother is.
have sex" with her, they had sex TOGETHER. He did have more to lose, you are right but he also could afford to lose more than she did. The two are not mutually exclusive. We don't know the intricacies of his relationship with his fiance at the time they hooked up. We can assume he cheated and we might be right. But we don't know that to be the case and thats what you have so much vitriol towards this over. I can just as easily say its her fault that all this happened since he didn't rape the bytch and she isn't having sex with him unless she explicitly chose to do so which is why we're here.