Should Ludacris get full custody of the child he tried to have aborted?

Should he?

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 52.7%
  • No

    Votes: 26 47.3%

  • Total voters
    55

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
What in the hell makes y'all think this going to be such a stable home.

Luda wife was in a relationship with Luda when he had the baby on her.

How the hell is she suppose to faithfully and fully raise that child?

This shyt is fukked up

Exactly my point. Is ludacris going to be staying up all night to feed and take care of a 1 yr old? Cause throwing money at a child isn't raising her.

He'll probably expect his current wife Eudoxie to become the surrogate mother...and watch this fall steadily apart.

Anyway, you look at it...it is a messed up situation....it just looks better on ludacris considering the mothers history but he made his bed...
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
Child support is the devil and it's basically legalized extortion. Only in America where this happens.

We need to adopt new laws. I'm voting for @Slaimon to be head consultant.
Chid support like welfare isn't the problem..
the way it is used is the issue. Modt women aren't thousands of dollars monthly for their child to ger outta here.

Luda put his damn self in this predicament. The icing on the cake would have been cEudoxie divorcing him...
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
Had I been the judge. This is what I would have decreed:

A conditional full custody for ludacris until the mother can straighten her life out to properly raise the child by giving her two years where she must get a respectable employment.

She comes back and has 'changed her life'...then depending on the cirmcumstances either full or joint custody in which luda would have to pay capped child support.

Due to the mother's past...montly statements would have to be provided on how the funds are being used.

If the woman did nit hold her part...then Id give luda full custody with the mother having visitation rights.
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
he wanted the kid aborted to save money. he wants custody to save money.
if the mom is a good mom, then i don't understand why he should get full custody.
don't think the mom deserves the child either but I think she may be able to contest the decision if she can prove that she has become more stable and can fix her life up.

Child support is supposed to be just that...support not to finance a lifestyle.
 

Opus

Pro
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
924
Reputation
250
Daps
1,822
Reppin
NULL
It's irrelavent. How many times does a woman go back in forth in her head about a abortion? End up on the clinic table and decide no? Only difference is Luda's thoughts at that moment in time was memorialized and set in stone so to speak. The bottomline is it didn't happen. So the only question is what's best for child. The fact that at some point a parent contemplated abortion and seemed willing to go through with it has nothing to do with what's best for a child? What's next?

We gonna be like oh hey dad was much more enthusiastic about keeping the baby versus the mom who visited the abortion clinic three times but couldn't quite pull the trigger so obviously dad wants the baby more. . .gtfo. it's here, now deal with it. Isn't that the same logic women use on men to discourage deadbeat dads? Now they want to use opposite logic to deprive a father who wants custody? Typical feminist two faced trash :camby:
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
It's irrelavent. How many times does woman go back in forth in her head about a abortion? End up on the clinic table and decide no? Only difference is Luda's thoughts at that moment in time was memorialized and set in stone so to speak. The bottomline is it didn't happen. So the only question is what's best for child. The fact that at some point a parent contemplated abortion and seemed willing to go through with it has nothing to do with what's best for a child? What's next?

We gonna be like oh hey dad was much more enthusiastic about keeping the baby versus the mom who visited the abortion clinic three times but couldn't quite pull the trigger so obviously dad wants the baby more. . .gtfo. it's here, now deal with it. Isn't that the same logic women use on men to discourage deadbeat dads? Now they want to use that opposite logic to deprive a father who wants custody? Typical feminist two faced trash :camby:

Keep blaming feminism for all your problems.

The child here there is nothing he can do...he.can't abort it now but he could go back and ensure the child was never born he certainly would.
 

Opus

Pro
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
924
Reputation
250
Daps
1,822
Reppin
NULL
Keep blaming feminism for all your problems.

The child here there is nothing he can do...he.can't abort it now but he could go back and ensure the child was never born he certainly would.

Keep arguing in hyperbole and in make believe scenarios where we have time machines
 

Opus

Pro
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
924
Reputation
250
Daps
1,822
Reppin
NULL
My point still stands...don't blame him either...but he did that to himself.

You didn't make a point. You accused me of doing something you couldn't possibly know I do. And you pondered the implications of a world with time machines. All of that stands? Awesome.
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
You didn't make a point. You accused me of doing something you couldn't possibly know I do. And you pondered the implications of a world with time machines. All of that stands? Awesome.

Only point that matters is what's best for a child. Are you saying parents that at some point wanted an abortion can't love their children? What if a chick took the morning after pill a day too late then decides to keep the baby does that mean she shouldn't have custody because she once tried to kill the baby?

This line of reasoning is ridiculous
I said he made his bed now he must lie It. Never claimed he cannot loVe his child. But the chuld is not a product of an ideal situation.
 

wunder

Pro
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
251
Reputation
10
Daps
605
Chid support like welfare isn't the problem..
the way it is used is the issue. Modt women aren't thousands of dollars monthly for their child to ger outta here.

Luda put his damn self in this predicament. The icing on the cake would have been cEudoxie divorcing him...
You say Luda trying to get out of paying his BM, but, why do you forget about Luda's BM? If she wasn't so greedy by asking for more money she would still be receiving $7k in child support. Let's say there was no such thing as child support, would Luda's BM still have his baby or would she get an abortion? She would most likely have an abortion, still be with Luda and everyone would be happy. At the end of it all, its as you said no one took responsibility and theres an innocent child in the mix.

What's best for the child?I believe its best for the kid to live with her father. At the end of the day Luda has the best resources to take better care of the child. I have seen with my own eyes that single mothers aren't responsible enough to take proper care of their children.
 

Opus

Pro
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
924
Reputation
250
Daps
1,822
Reppin
NULL
I said he made his bed now he must lie It. Never claimed he cannot loVe his child. But the chuld is not a product of an ideal situation.

When women have the choice to unilaterally terminate or continue a pregnancy that happens a lot. At the same time, men are always told to accept whatever decision a woman makes. That should apply when a man is deadbeat as well as when men want custody. I get the control over your body, but then they want control over a man's involvement with the child too? Can't have it like that. Courts will decide now, lucky for her, abortion contract or not women end up with custody 9 times out of 10 anyway. Kind of a moot point being duscussed
 

King Poetic

God’s Favorite Sagittarius
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
107,526
Reputation
23,090
Daps
522,370
Reppin
Southern California
Damn chick only get 800 dollars a month..

And her expenses are 3 times her income..

But she walking around acting like she's top shyt at 45... fukking ghetto hoes
 

Yup

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
11,512
Reputation
-3,630
Daps
10,111
Reppin
Life
When women have the choice to unilaterally terminate or continue a pregnancy that happens a lot. At the same time, men are always told to accept whatever decision a woman makes. That should apply when a man is deadbeat as well as when men want custody. I get the control over your body, but then they want control over a man's involvement with the child too? Can't have it like that. Courts will decide now, lucky for her, abortion contract or not women end up with custody 9 times out of 10 anyway. Kind of a moot point being duscussed
What the hell are you talking about?
 
Top