Slaves were NOT taken from Africa!!!

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,802
Reputation
3,176
Daps
35,483
Reppin
NULL
Africans were taken from Africa... not slaves. Normal productive productive people of skilled work from an advanced civilization

18th century newspaper article advertising Africans who had JUST arrived on American shores. We came from fully functioning societies

1zb84z4.jpg


Carpenters, black smiths, bricklayers, bakers, hairdressers, dressmakers, printers, surveyors, copper plate printers, perukemakers (those head pieces judges wear) tailors, shoemakers. Not noted here but there were even architects.

It's funny how they use of language is a weapon used against black people

yes, I'm referring to the use of the nword


wake up brothers.

Black Pride :blessed:
 
Last edited:

kp404

Live Or Let Die
Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
19,086
Reputation
7,496
Daps
46,078
Reppin
The Black Community
The best book on this that uses all the primary documents to prove Africans were taken from the continent based on their region's economic specialized skill is Michael Gomez's "Exchanging Our Country Marks: The Transformation of African identities in the Colonial and Antebellum South." Rich history of the African regions and how they were taken by whites based on their labor skill
 

Uptown WaYo87

HARLEM/BX
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,826
Reputation
861
Daps
15,879
so the general consensus before was that the black people taken from africa were already slaves in africa?

i thought it was common knowledge that the africans taken as slaves were already in established civilizations...so it was bound to have people with skills...which made slavery even worse because you were taking people from their homes
 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,802
Reputation
3,176
Daps
35,483
Reppin
NULL
The best book on this that uses all the primary documents to prove Africans were taken from the continent based on their region's economic specialized skill is Michael Gomez's "Exchanging Our Country Marks: The Transformation of African identities in the Colonial and Antebellum South." Rich history of the African regions and how they were taken by whites based on their labor skill
any link to a pdf?
 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,802
Reputation
3,176
Daps
35,483
Reppin
NULL
so the general consensus before was that the black people taken from africa were already slaves in africa?

i thought it was common knowledge that the africans taken as slaves were already in established civilizations...so it was bound to have people with skills...which made slavery even worse because you were taking people from their homes
you commonly hear people say "the slaves were taken from africa" this is what im gettin at
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,499
Reputation
1,529
Daps
25,709
Reppin
L.A
Doesnt matter, whites bought black people, treated them like dirt, with centuries of horrendous abuse, dumped 10s of millions on the ocean and continue treating black people like shyt in 2014.

O wait, and the same people they bought black people from they beat the shyt out of them and treated them like shyt.

So really, tallying up how many black people were sold or taken really makes no difference when whites made the choice to enslave a race and after doing so, treat their lives as worthless.

Just white supremacists, trying to find ways of alleviating themselves of guilt.

Thats like me going to South America to buy a maid, and then bringing her to America to make her a sex slave, then tell her family, well, yall wanted her to get her green card........ :troll:
 

LionofJudah

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
6,372
Reputation
835
Daps
11,605
Reppin
NULL
Well, let me ask y'all this. Whoever wants to answer is fine. How do you suppose MILLIONS of people were taken from a single continent with the main concentration coming from a specific place which is Western Africa? Why not Eastern, Southern, Northern, Central Africa? Yes, I know some slaves were taken from there, but not many. Furthermore, the Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted hundreds of years. Why do you think Africans didn't band together doing that time to defend against the invading enemy?
 

Dada

Face===>Heel
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
3,753
Reputation
215
Daps
2,839
I thought this thread was going in another direction from the title, like not this again. :upsetfavre:...then :ohhh:..:leon:


^Actually 36-40% were taken from Central Africa (Gabon to ,Angola). I think the misconception is that there has been a tendency to call everything not extreme North (Libya), South (South Africa), and East (Somalia, Ethiopia),....West Africa.
 

QuintessentialBM

GoldenAgeGamer82 - PSN ID
Joined
Dec 24, 2012
Messages
9,514
Reputation
1,542
Daps
14,435
Reppin
Gamers Paradise
Well, let me ask y'all this. Whoever wants to answer is fine. How do you suppose MILLIONS of people were taken from a single continent with the main concentration coming from a specific place which is Western Africa? Why not Eastern, Southern, Northern, Central Africa? Yes, I know some slaves were taken from there, but not many. Furthermore, the Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted hundreds of years. Why do you think Africans didn't band together doing that time to defend against the invading enemy?


I'll answer this..... 3 things......

Access & proximity... Should be self-explanatory.

Money & goods.... Slaves were traded for mostly money and guns. You think that the tribes that were trading would give that up?

Fear of subjugation and/or annihilation.... Some tribes had a change of heart after the fact but the damage was done. After the lies wouldn't work anymore and Africans figured out what was going on, those tribes were threaten with the same weapons they were trading to obtain. I would surmise to say that the Europeans and slave trading tribes started kidnapping people from other tribes.
 

kp404

Live Or Let Die
Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
19,086
Reputation
7,496
Daps
46,078
Reppin
The Black Community
I thought this thread was going in another direction from the title, like not this again. :upsetfavre:...then :ohhh:..:leon:


^Actually 36-40% were taken from Central Africa (Gabon to ,Angola). I think the misconception is that there has been a tendency to call everything not extreme North (Libya), South (South Africa), and East (Somalia, Ethiopia),....West Africa.

Exactly..Gomez proves in the book I mentioned everything you posted. Central Africa and South Africa contributed heavily to the African slave population on the transatlantic slave trade, not just the West African dominant theory...whites took specific Africans that specialized in particular economic processes;
 
Top