Now that I've been convinced by the OP and art barr, I do wonder what if tho. What if hbk wouldn't have missed that time due to injury? That was around the time rock and Austin were the top stars correct? Would it be different then? Also think what if Daniel Bryan stayed with wwe the whole time and didn't get fired with the Justin Roberts incident? That probably would've convinced more posters. I never saw his indy work and had took a break from wrestling from after the brand split until raw after summerslam 2011, when Nash attacked punk. So I missed his beginnings at wwe which is why I was more biased to Shawn at first. And many others here disagree with you and I can see where there coming from. It's a tough comparison since Shawn was more of a showman and headlined all those wrestlemanias. I think if Daniel Bryan would've been in wwe the whole time, more posters would see where you're coming from. Hopefully he gets the opportunity to main event or be in the top matches for a few years.[DOUBLEPOST=1397402858][/DOUBLEPOST]I'm not sure if I agree about the bret part tho. It's debatable.
db is much better than Bret was a long time ago as well.
only people who don't undestand that.
use wwe bias as false claim to legitimize their false stance via arguement.
so, just appease those aficionados, for the sake of their one sided arguement.
I am glad this thread was made, after db's triumph.
yet, this comparison and their stance was debunked by me in this community close to five years ago.
then again, when Bryan first entered the wwe via the neutered Daniel Bryan character.
where the arguement was given the let him succeed in the wwe variable by naysayers.
now, that Bryan has surpassed both Bret and hbk in shorter order.
with an even more robust glass ceiling.
my stance on the facts about Bryan being superior to hbk and Bret is completely actualized on all parameters.
Art Barr
hbk, even in what if fashion.
does not have the long term timeline of quality or success in tags or in singles action.
to match, d.bry's success in either capacity as a performer.
plus, hbk's model as a performer is based on west Texas redneck drawing principles.
where psychology is wholely limited from the style and most importantly the finish.
so, hbk even injured would never had the actual psychology via style to mach bryan's match workrate and quality.
on top of the fact Bryan sells better than hbk as well.
plus, can also do the west Texas match and finish better than hbk and the clique member's as well.
as illustrate in his wwe tenure.
where the clique smashmouth me style is solely based on the west Texas style.
this forum's adulation of hbk is more boyhood fandom and infatuations. Than actual factual knowledge as a smart.
it would be like me trying to authenicate hogun.
wholey as a entertainer and his workrate, erroneously.
over flair all because I grew up watching hogun first and if I never switched the channel.
Art Barr