So We (Blacks) Started The Human Race!

[GetInTheTruck]

So the Aztecs and the USA are "contemporaneous"


And we are not talking about did " things completely on their own with little to no outside influence." We are discussing who did what first.

And this is what separates honest examinations of history from those that are fueled by agendas. In this regard we can say that most Africans are inferior to others since for the most part they produced no written language. You find that kind of analysis acceptable? Innovations arise out of necessity, not necessarily the superiority of one group over the other.

 

[Poitier]

most

don't add qualifiers

 

[Brown_Pride]

This post makes no sense.

If your ancestors left Africa 50,000 years ago then everything that happened in Africa after is not of your heritage.

oh ok so 50k is the arbitrary number you've selected. That's a pretty long time ago.

How does this work for the rather large portion of the population with a fraction of their heritage belonging to what people consider "african americans". Do they fall under the 50k umbrella? I've seen my family tree and I have some black it in about 4-5 generations ago.

Do i count? Can I NOW feel a sense of pride for something one of my ancestors did?

 

[Poitier]

I have some black it in about 4-5 generations ago.

how convenient

 

[Fillerguy]

Wait this shyt isn't common knowledge to the non bible thumpers?

 

[010101]

mass distraction*

 

[Blackking]

the theory however is based on the appearance of apes and lice. we are able to get a rough idea when we lost our hair and got sweat glands because the lice on humans are different than the lice on apes. theres a split in their evolution at about the same time lucy was found....

seems like I'm always having to explain against some ol group think 9th grade science drone shyt up in here.







This stuff you all are saying about some loose assumptions about the Original Man being Pink; can't be tested or proven , etc.... is a wild guess At Best.

Especially if humans started off on the continent of Africa -- Why would we even develop light skin when that is harmful in Every Way to our survival? That wouldn't make evolutionary sense.. to go through ALL these millions of years of development stages and come out as a pink homo sapiens that are susceptible to the harmful UV rays with skin that is the least likely the protect our DNA?!?


Modern humans popped up like 200K ago.. This supposed 'change' from light to dark so called because of hair loss happened over 1 million years ago - AND in any regard ------- The skin color on Humans ( dark) is considered a positive selection... not neutral or anything... 100% positive.


We assume why we lose hair-- we say its because of the hot weather when we moved from tree living...... Well then what about the animals that kept their hair and still manage to keep cool??

We say we had light skin before we lost the hair ------- but we do not know that to be true. All humans have the same number of melanin cells.... it's just that some humans have cells that produce more amounts of it.

We base all this on the fact that Modern Chimps have light skin with hair. But this is still assumption about humans.... all we know of is dark skinned humans... we don't' know of any light skin humans until only a few thousand years ago when the genetic mistakes popped off.

Think about how tough it is for humans to produce in large numbers.. especially the harsh environments we had back then when we didn't know shyt about shyt.... Basic science claims that for all animals the goal is to not waste energy and food and to reproduce.. everything about Melanin helps with that. The development of lighter skinned humans seems counterproductive by definition. lacking in folic acid causes fertility problems in men, problems during pregnancy , prone to cancers, and less energy for survival.

Why humans became naked apes is still a mystery. (according to BBC) Period. All we know is there are forced theories about hair lose relating to skin color. But we don't know it was because we were too hot to have hair.... That's not always the reason...
Whales lost their hair so they could move faster, some land animals lost their hair because of what they ate provided so much fat they didn't need it to keep warm......... etc.

Dr. Mark Pagel of the University of Reading in England and Dr. Walter Bodmer of the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford have proposed a different solution to the mystery and their idea, if true, goes far toward explaining contemporary attitudes about hirsuteness. Humans lost their body hair, they say, to free themselves of external parasites that infest fur -- blood-sucking lice, fleas and ticks and the diseases they spread.

We are an advanced species...... so why only believe in the loose theories that don't make sense - but not mention the ones that do make sense?

 

[Brown_Pride]

how convenient

well per the argument you've provided EVERYONE has some black in their past. Please provide me the thresh hold for when one can in fact claim their heritage and thus the pride so many derive from that heritage.

Your shyt don't make sense B.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

how convenient

how you so sure you come from the nile? we could easily say thats

 

[Tommy Knocks]

seems like I'm always having to explain against some ol group think 9th grade science drone shyt up in here.







This stuff you all are saying about some loose assumptions about the Original Man being Pink; can't be tested or proven , etc.... is a wild guess At Best.

Especially if humans started off on the continent of Africa -- Why would we even develop light skin when that is harmful in Every Way to our survival? That wouldn't make evolutionary sense.. to go through ALL these millions of years of development stages and come out as a pink homo sapiens that are susceptible to the harmful UV rays with skin that is the least likely the protect our DNA?!?


Modern humans popped up like 200K ago.. This supposed 'change' from light to dark so called because of hair loss happened over 1 million years ago - AND in any regard ------- The skin color on Humans ( dark) is considered a positive selection... not neutral or anything... 100% positive.


We assume why we lose hair-- we say its because of the hot weather when we moved from tree living...... Well then what about the animals that kept their hair and still manage to keep cool??

We say we had light skin before we lost the hair ------- but we do not know that to be true. All humans have the same number of melanin cells.... it's just that some humans have cells that produce more amounts of it.

We base all this on the fact that Modern Chimps have light skin with hair. But this is still assumption about humans.... all we know of is dark skinned humans... we don't' know of any light skin humans until only a few thousand years ago when the genetic mistakes popped off.

Think about how tough it is for humans to produce in large numbers.. especially the harsh environments we had back then when we didn't know shyt about shyt.... Basic science claims that for all animals the goal is to not waste energy and food and to reproduce.. everything about Melanin helps with that. The development of lighter skinned humans seems counterproductive by definition. lacking in folic acid causes fertility problems in men, problems during pregnancy , prone to cancers, and less energy for survival.

Why humans became naked apes is still a mystery. (according to BBC) Period. All we know is there are forced theories about hair lose relating to skin color. But we don't know it was because we were too hot to have hair.... That's not always the reason...
Whales lost their hair so they could move faster, some land animals lost their hair because of what they ate provided so much fat they didn't need it to keep warm......... etc.



We are an advanced species...... so why only believe in the loose theories that don't make sense - but not mention the ones that do make sense?

you realize apes in africa have pink skin right? at one point we split from said apes, which means we did in fact have pink skin.

and no its not a mystery on how we lost our hair, the theory is that once upright we became long distance runners, this created the sweat gland, fur dropped off shortly after.

 

[Poitier]

well per the argument you've provided EVERYONE has some black in their past. Please provide me the thresh hold for when one can in fact claim their heritage and thus the pride so many derive from that heritage.

Your shyt don't make sense B.

30 % indigenous African ancestry

 

[Blackking]

oh ok so 50k is the arbitrary number you've selected. That's a pretty long time ago.

How does this work for the rather large portion of the population with a fraction of their heritage belonging to what people consider "african americans". Do they fall under the 50k umbrella? I've seen my family tree and I have some black it in about 4-5 generations ago.

Do i count? Can I NOW feel a sense of pride for something one of my ancestors did?

Aren't you Mexican?

Can't you just feel proud about Mexico shyt... there is much history there.

We don't have to feel pride about everything that has ever happened in history , because the entire earth was black until a few thousand years ago.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Aren't you Mexican?

Can't you just feel proud about Mexico shyt... there is much history there.

We don't have to feel pride about everything that has ever happened in history , because the entire earth was black until a few thousand years ago.

@ the irony of this post

 

[GetInTheTruck]

don't add qualifiers

How would you word that differently?

 

[BDsavage92]

In this regard we can say that most Africans are inferior to others since for the most part they produced no written language

?